You'd think he should get a week with the rule that states any high bumps that constitutes rough conduct with the potential to cause injury gets a minimum of medium impact, even if the contact is low.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This x100. How many times does this bloke get the opportunity to keep whacking people. It wasn't a massive impact but his history should be taken into account.Bloke is a dead set flog. Simply no explanation for hanging the arm out other than "I want to clip this bloke in the head"
Will only get a week but should be 4 as a repeat offender.
That is actually a great point. You can get a longer suspension if you accidently collide with someone and cause a concussion than if you snipe someone intentionally and don't cause one.Should be graded as intentional, high contact, low impact.
Can’t believe that intentional isn’t an automatic one week suspension. We need to stamp this dirty s**t out.
Yep, if an intentional grading becomes an automatic suspension watch this sort of stuff as well as the gut punches and jumper punches disappear overnightThat is actually a great point. You can get a longer suspension if you accidently collide with someone and cause a concussion than if you snipe someone intentionally and don't cause one.
I think you'll find the AFL hates people throwing late elbows to the head, actuallyShould be nothing but because the AFL hates Melbourne he'll get a week. Our players always seem to be the ones the tribunal loves to make an example of.
I would love for the club to appeal any suspension and use the human frisbee defense.
This wouldnt be an anti-Melbourne sentiment because of the precedent of King and Windhager. Pickett pulled the Elbow out and that is something that we should always look to punish. I am not too sure when it changed but I remember in juniors back in the 2000s I was told that if you raise an elbow you will be sent off and rubbed out.Should be nothing but because the AFL hates Melbourne he'll get a week. Our players always seem to be the ones the tribunal loves to make an example of.
I would love for the club to appeal any suspension and use the human frisbee defense.
"Elbows"I think you'll find the AFL hates people throwing late elbows to the head, actually
He didn't raise the elbow give me a spellThis wouldnt be an anti-Melbourne sentiment because of the precedent of King and Windhager. Pickett pulled the Elbow out and that is something that we should always look to punish. I am not too sure when it changed but I remember in juniors back in the 2000s I was told that if you raise an elbow you will be sent off and rubbed out.
He’ll somehow only get 1 week, not learn his lesson and then go jumping into someone else’s head again later this season. Very clear he wants to hurt players and doesn’t care about the rules. He will seriously hurt someone at some point in his career
1 week punishment as I believe he sent Soligo a bottle of wine and played golf with him before the game even finished!
I get supporting your club and its players but how on earth do you reasonably look at the Maynard one and go he needs a long ban, and Pickett you say "nothing to see here, move along".
Like we've gone from being a one-eyed supporter to being an actual blind one.