Player X or Player Y (part 2)

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Which two out of Hartlett, Wells, Masten and Cotchin?

not a great fan of any of these, Wells injury concerns although under priced, Masten should go up but I dont think enough to be a mid keeper, Hartlett looks a good prospect but hasnt played a pre seaon game, and Cothcin looks a great player but not sure if he is a good scorer; look elsewhere.

Please rate these keepers in order of value for money;

470 Gibbs
456 Boyd
454 Pendleberry
453 Selwood
449 Mitchell
411 Lewis

eg is Gibbs better value than Lewis at an extra 59K?
 

Log in to remove this ad.

453 Selwood
454 Pendleberry
456 Boyd
449 Mitchell
470 Gibbs
411 Lewis

That would be my order.

Kruezer + Tippett Vs Sandi + Nic Nat
 
This is doing my head in

Swift v Ball

Obviously Ball costs more, but more importantly who do you think will generate more points?
 
Tough one atm my rookies are rockliff and podsy, as i think they will play alot of games this season while I cant see either of these cementing spots in there sides. I think TDL has more upside and still has shown glimpses and could easily get games in a weak syd fwd line, while hitchcock also has shown potential but would want to step it up to be named rd 1

Bradshaw, White, Goodes- One of the most dangerous Key forward combos in the league
Jetta and Jack to possibly take the flanks- Speed and flashiness
Bevan- Provides grunt in the forward pocket with his tackling ability
Veszpremi and McGlynn to play in the forward line, tackling, kicking goals and Vespers deadly foot skill.

Weak forward line :rolleyes:
 
Bradshaw, White, Goodes- One of the most dangerous Key forward combos in the league
Jetta and Jack to possibly take the flanks- Speed and flashiness
Bevan- Provides grunt in the forward pocket with his tackling ability
Veszpremi and McGlynn to play in the forward line, tackling, kicking goals and Vespers deadly foot skill.

Weak forward line :rolleyes:

vs. Sydney having O'Loughlin, O'Keefe, Barry Hall, Amon Buchanon and Goodes?
 
vs. Sydney having O'Loughlin, O'Keefe, Barry Hall, Amon Buchanon and Goodes?
O'Keefe didn't play forward last year... common error from people who don't watch the swannies
Barry was great but his discipline etc.
Amon, O'Loughlin- Both over the hill, were great in their time
Goodes- Watch out 2010!

Back to Dt...
Kreuzer and Masten
Or
Mitchell/Boyd and McEvoy
(First ruck is Sandi)

I know I've already done it but my last response was pretty poor so I'd like someone else's thoughts :thumbsu:
 
O'Keefe didn't play forward last year... common error from people who don't watch the swannies
Barry was great but his discipline etc.
Amon, O'Loughlin- Both over the hill, were great in their time
Goodes- Watch out 2010!

Back to Dt...
Kreuzer and Masten
Or
Mitchell/Boyd and McEvoy
(First ruck is Sandi)

I know I've already done it but my last response was pretty poor so I'd like someone else's thoughts :thumbsu:

By a mile, you have to figure that Kruezer/Masten will both average at least 70 and hopefully 75/80. Whereas with Mitchell/Boyd you know you will get 95-105 from them but McEvoy is a total unknown and also unlikely to play 22 games which you will hopefully get from the Kruezer/Masten option.

Hille vs Ottens
 
I've asked Saints fans and they all think that Big Mac is in the best 22 this season and should play all games. I'm hoping that Warnock can rise in cash enough so I can downgrade him to a 77k rookie and upgrade Big Mac to a keeper ruckman but that is possibly wishful thinking. If Ben Mac averages 60 and Masten and Kreuzer average 80 each... Mitchell should average like you said 95-105... same total. Making me think whether it is worth the risk...
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Hall vs Ziebell

Seems Ziebell is a favourite among these forums however which do u think will be the better cash cow. Ziebell is younger and therefore has a better chance of not getting injured but if Hall pulls out some massive scores against bad teams then it would seem more logical to pick him as it could be a straight swap to a fallen premium.

I doubt Ziebell has the potential to score 100+, where his scores will hover around the 70-80 however Hall has the capacity to score 120 etc therefore increasing in price much faster than Ziebell.

Especially against teams such as Melb, WCE, Freo, i can see Hall kick 6-9 goals where he shuld easily reach 120.

I dont expect either to be a keeper, therefore not looking too heavily in their ability to play 22 games.

Thoughts???
 
Cant deicde!

Fisher and Harvey (roos) OR Goddard and Medhurst (or another under 310k forward)

thx hypes!

Go with the safe option. Fisher and Harvey that is. Both premiums that will score you well and both durable. Medhurst is still unproven.


Which three out of the following:

J.Hunt, Myers, Ladson, Kennelly, Malceski
 
Go with the safe option. Fisher and Harvey that is. Both premiums that will score you well and both durable. Medhurst is still unproven.


Which three out of the following:

J.Hunt, Myers, Ladson, Kennelly, Malceski

Thx for reply!

Id go (and am going) with hunt, ladson and kennelly

Also fisher has been crap all NAB cup and harvey is 32 i think - i was actually thinking of god/med, am i just being paranoid?

Thx H2G!
 
Not to do with pricing but moreso scoring and games.

Who would you go in preference order Banner, Bastinac, Lucas and Kyler-Thomson?

Next batch - Rohan, Moore and Barlow?

Final batch - Ballantye, Sam Wright & Sloane
 
Not to do with pricing but moreso scoring and number of games played.

Who would you go in preference order Banner, Bastinac, Lucas and Kyler-Thomson?

Next batch - Rohan, Moore and Barlow?

Final batch - Ballantye, Sam Wright & Sloane
 
Hall vs Ziebell

Seems Ziebell is a favourite among these forums however which do u think will be the better cash cow. Ziebell is younger and therefore has a better chance of not getting injured but if Hall pulls out some massive scores against bad teams then it would seem more logical to pick him as it could be a straight swap to a fallen premium.

I doubt Ziebell has the potential to score 100+, where his scores will hover around the 70-80 however Hall has the capacity to score 120 etc therefore increasing in price much faster than Ziebell.

Especially against teams such as Melb, WCE, Freo, i can see Hall kick 6-9 goals where he shuld easily reach 120.

I dont expect either to be a keeper, therefore not looking too heavily in their ability to play 22 games.

Thoughts???

You make excellent arguements for both. I agree that Barry will have more 90+ point games than Ziebell, but he is a riskier proposition cos of injuries and possible suspension (touch wood). However you state that you only want these guys until a point where u can swap them for a fallen prem so say mid-season..so i suggest you take a punt and choose Hall.
 
J selwood Vs Matthew Boyd

One selecton i cant seem to make my mind up on.. Both have simliar handball to kick ratios similar DT game.. similar upside.. simliar price

I do think Boyd could really up the ante this year and do a montagna/hayes where is i feel Selwood is a little to inside a midfielder compared to Boyd.. Needs to have a good day tackling to really hit the bigger scores..
 
really think selwood is gonna have a ripper of a year, gonna keep improving and still fly under the rader.
my question is

judd + goodes or pendles + cooney

not worried about judd not playing first 3 rounds as im not aiming to win the comp

or do u think there is a better player for goodes price
my midfield is goodes, judd, dal santo, selwoo, trengrove, martin
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top