Zacs_Magic_Tooth
Team Captain
- Apr 1, 2021
- 395
- 969
- AFL Club
- Brisbane Lions
I don't really get why most Crows supporters are so against it. Makes the game look like a real South Australian event.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Anyway, a way to solve the problem has been found
Port should wear it and be happy to walk away with no points. Everyone will know the real state of the ladder.
Outside the 10 years between 1995-2004 the design of the Richmond jumper has been largely the same over the last 100 years.Every club guernsey has gone through minor changes over the years including Richmond’s. When I was growing up in the 90’s only the front had the sash and there were gold numbers on a fully black back. Is that a different guernsey to what you’re wearing now? Technically yes, but fundamentally no. The essence of the design is the same and is recognised as such by any reasonable person.
And I think we can make allowances for world wars sheesh.
Outside the 10 years between 1995-2004 the design of the Richmond jumper has been largely the same over the last 100 years.
How do these versions of Ports 'iconic' jumper keep the essence of the design the same?
View attachment 1114376
View attachment 1114377
View attachment 1114378
View attachment 1114379
View attachment 1114381
View attachment 1114382
View attachment 1114383
How do these versions of Ports 'iconic' jumper keep the essence of the design the same?
You left out the blue, magenta and pink jumpers.They all have black and white stripes as the primary feature - how is that not keeping the essence of the design??
You left out the blue, magenta and pink jumpers.
Outside the 10 years between 1995-2004 the design of the Richmond jumper has been largely the same over the last 100 years.
How do these versions of Ports 'iconic' jumper keep the essence of the design the same?
View attachment 1114376
View attachment 1114377
View attachment 1114378
View attachment 1114379
View attachment 1114381
View attachment 1114382
View attachment 1114383
The good news though is that nobody gives a toss about your opinion or mine.
What matters is that Gil and co. - while not always paragons of wisdom - aren't complete halfwits like some of you, so they recognise that allowing Port to do this would be idiotic. So the non-issue is being settled the correct way
Does any other sporting league in the world does with Collingwood and Port?
As in:
a) “No Port Adelaide. Only Collingwood can wear black and white. Only them.”
b) “No Port Adelaide. You cannot wear black and white. We don’t care that Collingwood are not your opponents.”
Every single league I can think of in the world - EPL, Serie A, La Liga, the NBA etc, has teams that have the same or similar colors.
How do they deal with it?
a) Having clash guernseys and getting on with life
b) Literally no other team I can think of doing what Collingwood does i.e having a massive cry, jumping up and down and carrying on like pork chops and insisting that their colours are theirs and theirs exclusively. And if they did, they’d be told to grow up and STFU.
Yet year after year the league has to kowtow to Collingwood (and Eddie’s) ridiculous song and dance that black and white are exclusively theirs.
It’s not just the Port Adelaide issue. North Melbourne (and other teams Collingwood clash with) had to wear their away guernsey when playing a home game against Collingwood for years because Collingwood stamped their feet really hard and refused to wear a clash jumper.
Then there’s Eddie and Collingwood’s nauseating “But black and white is our heritage!!!” line used to justify their carry on with these issues.
Im pretty every other club in the league also has the same heritage and pride with their colours and jumpers as Collingwood, but every club adopted a clash strip and got on with life when they were asked to do so. But apparently Collingwood think they’re too good for this.
And apparently black and white cannot be Port Adelaide’s heritage either. No, it’s solely Collingwood’s, theirs only, theirs alone.
Yet the AFL constantly jump at shadows and bend over to Collingwood’s whim over all of these issues when they should have been told to grow up and get in line years ago. Nauseating.
TLDR - Collingwood. STFU, stop making a big song and dance and huffing and puffing over trivial issues and get on life. You sh*t everyone to tears over this.
You're taking the piss if you don't see why Collingwood wouldn't want a huge part of their brand, black and white stripes, to be adopted by another club because they want to relive past glory. If a club wanted to wear a black guernsey with a yellow sash going the opposite way of Richmond's, I'd be very surprised if the Tigers didn't kick up a stink.
First in, best dressed. Collingwood has been the team of black and white stripes on the VFL/AFL, and Port should embrace their Port Power identity with the teal and such, or find a way to integrate the "prison bars" without enroaching on another club's identity.
Another year, another stint of Port Adelaide arguing about clothes.
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Because they came into the comp as the port Adelaide power? Teal? Thunder bolts? Not prison bars/black and white stripes.Why did we accept Port Adelaide if we didn't want to encroach on someone's identity? It goes both ways.
Anyway Brisbane regularly wear the Fitzroy Lions jumper
On occasions the Lions have worn a Fitzroy jumper.
despite roylion campaigning on this site for years that Fitzroy still exists and there was no merger.
Don't get personal, it undermines your position. I'm not being obtuse at all. I don't 'know' that at all, lol and I've stated via IP and branding discussions, how I don't believe that to be the case unless new legal docs are drafted/something is changed on the jumper itself.
Might want to try being like your fellow supporter base poster above, who actually contributed something, without getting personal, and without acting tribalistic.