Autopsy Post Mortem vs Norf (Pies 84 def by Norf 124)

Remove this Banner Ad

Have to agree with TG on this one. Peddles' softly softly approach needs to change. Sometimes players need a rocket.

Personally l would like to see Adams handed the captaincy next year. Pendles is a champ of the game, but with age l would now like to see him focus on his game and remaining injury free.
 
The tripe he served up at the press conference was equally putrid. Saying that had we beaten North it would have been our best win is hog shit. Also blaming the forwards is rubbish. In the first quarter it was our backline that lost us the game.

Buckley said the forwards are on notice....well l think he and his coaching staff are in the same boat. He will coach next year, but if we have the disappointing season we have had for the last 3 years now, then he will not be coaching this club in 2018.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

The tripe he served up at the press conference was equally putrid. Saying that had we beaten North it would have been our best win is hog shit. Also blaming the forwards is rubbish. In the first quarter it was our backline that lost us the game.
NO mate. think you've read that wrong. It was exactly the same as last week against Adelaide. We lost every center clearance and despite this none of the forwards came down to half back at the center bounces. It is unfair to blame the backline when your midfield is getting smashed and neither the coaching staff or senior players on the field bother to try to do anything about it.
 
NO mate. think you've read that wrong. It was exactly the same as last week against Adelaide. We lost every center clearance and despite this none of the forwards came down to half back at the center bounces. It is unfair to blame the backline when your midfield is getting smashed and neither the coaching staff or senior players on the field bother to try to do anything about it.
Our midfield looked terrible at the clearances, particular in the center
 
My favourite part of our centre clearance work was how our forwards let Lindsay Thomas run unopposed from the forward line straight through the middle and get the clearance.

It happen so often, it must of been a joy for both coaching staff's to see a plan success. Our coaching staff got us to free up our forward line and create space, norf, well they just wanted the clearance.
 
Aish 1st 3 qtrs where very exciting but sadly went missing in last sadly. Though very Promising

Does not panic and hit targets
His kick into a target was from memory the only one that was on target.
The rest need to lower the eyes or at least kick to a contest, how many times did we kick straight to a Norf defender all alone.

Aisho looking goodo
 
I have sat quietly watching the footy for another season hoping all the issues from last year would be resolved and all the future success the club has hyped up come to fruition. And yet another season is over weeks out from the finals and this was one of the most disappointing games I have seen in a long time by the CFC.

Seriously I am not sure why the club can not see these issues, issues starting with the head coach.

First off, our assistant coaches are a real concern. Yes I loved Anthony Rocca, Tarkyn Locker and Scott Burns as players and Robert Harvey was a great player as was Ben Hart. But Rocca, Lockyer and Rivers have not coached elsewhere and Harvey couldn't even get the saints coaching role after being interim coach. Scott Waters was selected over him. Steve Grace has no afl experience and was only a junior development coach at freo and is now our forward line coach??????. Only Burns and Hart have experience at other clubs.
Yet the likes of hawthorn, Sydney and Geelong have experienced assistant coaches from outside the club bringing ideas and knowledge. Seems to me Buckley has a lot of YES men.

Second, the set up structures are woeful. Tonight I looked at norths forward line throughout the game and they were spread out, a tall isolated in the goal square and forwards standing at CHF to run in at the centre bounce with Lots of room to lead into.
Then I looked at ours after each goal and it looked congested and disorganised. Cloke and Moore almost stood together about 40m out from goal, we had no forward in the goal square and the rest of the forward line was standing with in 10m of Cloke and Moore. So any quick movement forward didn't have a long option, our flankers didn't get into the centre to help like norths did and any kick to Cloke or Moore meant they competed with each other with both of their defenders in tow. Good luck taking a mark.
I don't think I really seen a forward lead straight at the kicker and take a mark on the lead. It's like Buckley wants the players to Kick it over the forwards heads so they can run into goal????? Hmm that's so much easier than hitting up a leading target.

Third, just to increase the difficulty for the forward line, our game plan is to handball the ball backwards at every chance to a man standing 2m way dead still and put us under more pressure. Then if we don't turn it over we slam a kick forward as high as we can after giving the opposition time to get back in numbers.
No wonder Cloke is struggling to find touch FFS
Seriously, I was going insane the amount of times we picked up the ball and our first instinct was to look backwards.... Even our captain was doing it.

Fourth, when the ball is in defence all our team is in their half of the field. So we get a free or mark or turnover and look up to the wing only to see a crowded field and North defenders everywhere. Our players have no room to lead into so we either bomb it to a pack or we switch it and give time for North to get back into defence. This slows down and often stops any ball movement which makes it impossible for us to generate forward 50 entries.

Fifth, our midfield needs to learn to move during the centre square ball ups. God this is where we miss swanny as he was the master of that. We are all standing there watching the ruckman compete while the North mids were on the move anticipating the ball movement and then spreading when they got it while we chased them. It's not rocket science, Goldstein won most of the hit outs, he uses his right hand so run to where he is facing rather than standing there waiting for North to get the ball.

And finally, our starts are awful. 4 goals down vs GWS, 5 goals down vs Adelaide and North three weeks in a row. Um that is what I classify as an ongoing problem so why hasn't it been addressed FFS.

Ironically, we got to with in 15 points by moving the ball quickly, running past for the handball rather than standing behind waiting for it. We were on the move at the clearances and our forward line spread out generating room to run into.

But seriously, our lack of lead up marks and goals was still concerning. Most of our goals came from General play or at least 8 did.

We have the cattle, we have proved this periodically throughout the year particularly in the cats win, dogs loss and GWS win but I am sorry to say it's time to part ways with Bucks and clean out our footy department. A fresh preseason for 2017, new game plan, experienced head and assistant coaches is exactly what we need.

Taylor Adam and Ben Reid were the standouts for me tonight and Nathan brown never gave up. Moore was good in periods as was Sidey and the skipper. Grundy battled away and Maynard was good in parts but made some nervous inexperienced errors.

My rant over!




Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Nailed it!
 
No credit at all to north, they deserve absolutely none and Thomas is the biggest disgrace in the game. It's the worst I've seen us use the footy all year and a large chunk of north's goals came from bad turnovers, especially in the first quarter. I don't think it's a coincidence it happened at our first game at etihad for the year. Why we continue to gift home games to etihad tenants is beyond me.

Despite that I thought we showed great spirit in the second half and on another day or ground would have came away with the points.

Sinclair was badly missed and it wasn't until Varcoe went back that we played our best footy.


North absolutely smashed us out the center for the 1st half especially so in the 1st.

Wells didnt have an opponent half the time and just waited out the back for the recieve or waltzed straight through to recieve the tap. Then they used Swallow in this way in the 2nd half.

Their defenders held the structures well and smashed our fwd line bar a lone hand in Darcy Moore and at times Blair but he did as much good things as he did poor.

Our players are very poorly skilled, appear to lack a yard across the board like we have a team full of medium pacers.
We really struggle to make and create space and our spread is often matched by opposing teams as if we don't have the pace to break away clean. Something nth was able to do with alarming regularity.
Most of our clearences are scrub kicks fwd and very rarely is it a clean efficient break.
 
Last edited:
NO mate. think you've read that wrong. It was exactly the same as last week against Adelaide. We lost every center clearance and despite this none of the forwards came down to half back at the center bounces. It is unfair to blame the backline when your midfield is getting smashed and neither the coaching staff or senior players on the field bother to try to do anything about it.
The midfield was badly beaten in the first quarter, but that has nothing to do with the backline turning the ball over from kick-ins etc. Marsh and Howe were putrid early and cost goals, none of which can be attributed to the midfield.

This from the AFL site match feed - "Collingwood has conceded seven points per game from defensive 50 turnovers this season. It has already conceded 24 points tonight." That was at the 16 minute mark of the first quarter. 4 goals from defensive turnovers. They were equally as terrible as the midfield.
 
The midfield was badly beaten in the first quarter, but that has nothing to do with the backline turning the ball over from kick-ins etc. Marsh and Howe were putrid early and cost goals, none of which can be attributed to the midfield.

This from the AFL site match feed - "Collingwood has conceded seven points per game from defensive 50 turnovers this season. It has already conceded 24 points tonight." That was at the 16 minute mark of the first quarter. 4 goals from defensive turnovers. They were equally as terrible as the midfield.

Howe scrubbed one kick from a kick out.

The rest he hit targets the next kick was often the one that went awry.
 
Not many either.
Goldstein yes, Harvey yes.
So no North are medium.
That's why they win then lose and mix their form.

Wells is also an elite talent when in full flight.

As much as everyone hates Thomas for playing for frees he's also a very capable small fwd and has moments that create momentum swings. Something we lack.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

A lot of guys bad bad basic errors last night. More then in previous games. We can't seem to be crisp with our disposal all game. When we are we play like the GWS/Cats games.

One of our biggest problems is we don't do the basic things good enough. Like hitting the right target kicking to the right side is a team mate. Handballing in front of a team mate as he runs past not behind him. We fix those little things we will be better.

People must have bad memory's because those basic errors have been a common feature of this team for 3 years.
 
We have a long way to go unless we can clean up some of the undisciplined acts from this team of players. So disappointed today...

3 Players gave away 11 free kicks out of the 22 - Grundy (4), Williams (4), Greenwood (3)

Not sure how many 50 metre penalties or free kicks that resulted in goals.

Stupid skill errors and brain fades, not sure it is speed, they don't work hard enough for each other.

Why can't our forwards keep their structure? Total of 27 possessions from our 4 forwards, not good enough.

Then back to good old selection:
Was Fasolo fit?
Why Williams?
Not just rib problems with Pendlebury (If by some miracle we had gotten into the finals, you need a squad of at least 27, a fit captain and a player of his calibre is paramount).

Too much left to too few again, minus in almost every key stat except cont. poss and tackles (59 Marks to 88).
Crisp and Blair - 9 tackles each. :thumbsu:

Rant over/
 
We have a long way to go unless we can clean up some of the undisciplined acts from this team of players. So disappointed today...

3 Players gave away 11 free kicks out of the 22 - Grundy (4), Williams (4), Greenwood (3)

Not sure how many 50 metre penalties or free kicks that resulted in goals.

Stupid skill errors and brain fades, not sure it is speed, they don't work hard enough for each other.

Why can't our forwards keep their structure? Total of 27 possessions from our 4 forwards, not good enough.

Then back to good old selection:
Was Fasolo fit?
Why Williams?
Not just rib problems with Pendlebury (If by some miracle we had gotten into the finals, you need a squad of at least 27, a fit captain and a player of his calibre is paramount).

Too much left to too few again, minus in almost every key stat except cont. poss and tackles (59 Marks to 88).
Crisp and Blair - 9 tackles each. :thumbsu:

Rant over/
But it was a reasonably accurate rant :thumbsu:
 
We have a long way to go unless we can clean up some of the undisciplined acts from this team of players. So disappointed today...

3 Players gave away 11 free kicks out of the 22 - Grundy (4), Williams (4), Greenwood (3)

Not sure how many 50 metre penalties or free kicks that resulted in goals.

Stupid skill errors and brain fades, not sure it is speed, they don't work hard enough for each other.

Why can't our forwards keep their structure? Total of 27 possessions from our 4 forwards, not good enough.

Then back to good old selection:
Was Fasolo fit?
Why Williams?
Not just rib problems with Pendlebury (If by some miracle we had gotten into the finals, you need a squad of at least 27, a fit captain and a player of his calibre is paramount).

Too much left to too few again, minus in almost every key stat except cont. poss and tackles (59 Marks to 88).
Crisp and Blair - 9 tackles each. :thumbsu:

Rant over/

Its not just speed but our side across the board appears to lack a yard.

Other factors like positioning and also being often stagnant leaves them reactive rather than proactive.
So while its likey it is a combination of factors making them appear slower I still think we have 1 too many medium pacers and need to add a line breaker or 3.

Many times throughout the year i have watched a lot of our players start on an even keel with opponents and get burnt for pace.
Last night when north got the ball in congestion and then spread they gained distance on our mids without fail.
On the other hand when we spread they were able to keep up and close off any options.
 
We have a long way to go unless we can clean up some of the undisciplined acts from this team of players. So disappointed today...

3 Players gave away 11 free kicks out of the 22 - Grundy (4), Williams (4), Greenwood (3)

Not sure how many 50 metre penalties or free kicks that resulted in goals.

Stupid skill errors and brain fades, not sure it is speed, they don't work hard enough for each other.

Why can't our forwards keep their structure? Total of 27 possessions from our 4 forwards, not good enough.

Then back to good old selection:
Was Fasolo fit?
Why Williams?
Not just rib problems with Pendlebury (If by some miracle we had gotten into the finals, you need a squad of at least 27, a fit captain and a player of his calibre is paramount).

Too much left to too few again, minus in almost every key stat except cont. poss and tackles (59 Marks to 88).
Crisp and Blair - 9 tackles each. :thumbsu:

Rant over/
It's amazing that when sides hit running handball targets one after the other, they look fast. When the opposition is doing it well, teams look slow. When teams don't hit those running targets, fumble, chase arse, they look slow.
 
It's amazing that when sides hit running handball targets one after the other, they look fast. When the opposition is doing it well, teams look slow. When teams don't hit those running targets, fumble, chase arse, they look slow.

So when the ball is bounced in the center with all players standing side by side and their team consistantly is able to get yardage on ours but when we win possesion and spread are unable to break free what does that say?

Partly structure, partly stagnation but also lacking speed to break away.
 
We really need to overhaul the whole coaching department. Each line coach needs to fight for their job as we seem to be either inconsistent or non-existent.

It's difficult to work out how bad the forward coaching has been without understanding how the midfield is being asked to play.

Very rarely are our midfielders streaming through in space. They seem to follow eachother only a metre away rather than away from the congestion with space in front of them. Is that how they are being coached to play?

The nucleus is there for a very good team. Unfortunately, they don't play in a fluid motion.

I'd like to see a fresh new approach with new ideas from outside the club. Too many old pie players hold positions which they shouldn't. Rocca, Lockyer, Burns......are they the best in their roles? Brent Harvey has been hopeless.

How can we go from getting demolished in centre clearances to then getting on top? Coaches take too long to react. It was obvious in the first qtr what the Roos were doing with Wells yet we didn't attempt to combat that in the qtr at all? Does Bucks have too much confidence in the players?

Whether we like it or not, Bucks and his team have had time. Sure injuries haven't helped, however, that should stop the guys who are on the park from playing with some sort of system. It just hasn't happened.

There has been a real failure to recruit leaders.
The most basic skills have been embarrassing. Maynard can't be gifting goals like that. Who is in charge of development?

Team selection has also been ordinary.

Cloke needs to go end of the year. He will pop up with a game here or there, but we need to develop the forward line without him.

Can't help but think the club has been far too patient now. I thought Bucks would have the boys at least firing in the second half of the season. We need a fresh, exciting coaching team for 2017, rather than the stale, uninspiring group we have at present. It's not going to happen by recruiting a player or two. We have seen that. We need to get that spring back into the club. We need the kids to play for the coach.
 
It's amazing that when sides hit running handball targets one after the other, they look fast. When the opposition is doing it well, teams look slow. When teams don't hit those running targets, fumble, chase arse, they look slow.
Yep, last week Port did it to North, 2 weeks ago we did it GWS.
So the obvious question is why can a team do it one week and not the next, clearly it is not their ability because they have proved they can do it, so the only remaining explanation is IMV 'mental toughness'
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Autopsy Post Mortem vs Norf (Pies 84 def by Norf 124)

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top