Re: The Footy Show
1) the senior players haven't underperformed for years. Some have underperformed others have played well. There's been patches of all alike
2) if you believe the senior players have underperformed then that means you acknowledge the senior players are not crap and it's a combination of form or coaching that is the problem.
3) if it's a list management problem then the senior players haven't underperformed they're just not very good in he AFL. which is it?
4) kids does not = wins. Effective systems, good coaching, cutting edge processes with talent = wins. Primus is on record as saying the current state of the Port Adelaide list is similar to 1999 when Choco took over. In 1999 Port Adelaide went 12-10 and finished 7th after round 22.
5) There's a whole host of the non negotiables Primus reportedly presented in this thread here if you feel like contradicting yourself and the head coach
Enviable Tradition the sole goal of 2011 is to play the juniors and that's been put on record. It doesn't matter what happens to the rest of the club or the player list. It doesn't matter that a career spud like Leigh Brown can go on to establish a very good career at Collingwood because of good coaching and excellent systems/process
Yeah, it's just the senior's fault. everything since 2004 is all the senior's fault. Honestly
I'm thankful that we have supporters who pay no attention to the words of the head coach then invent their own agenda and pretend it's the one that Primus said he would use.BS. The senior players who have performed like Brogan, Dom and Shulz have remained in the team (when fit) Those that haven't have been sent back to the SANFL.
Primus has made it clear that we cant afford to keep having the same senior players underperforming year after year.
The younger players have been given more leeway and rightly so. They arent the ones who have been underperforming for years. We need to find out if they are going to develop into consistent AFL players if given the opportunity and at the same time we need to find out if the senior players are willing to put in the hard yards to work their way back into the tea. They have all been given opportunities it is up to them to take them.
1) the senior players haven't underperformed for years. Some have underperformed others have played well. There's been patches of all alike
2) if you believe the senior players have underperformed then that means you acknowledge the senior players are not crap and it's a combination of form or coaching that is the problem.
3) if it's a list management problem then the senior players haven't underperformed they're just not very good in he AFL. which is it?
4) kids does not = wins. Effective systems, good coaching, cutting edge processes with talent = wins. Primus is on record as saying the current state of the Port Adelaide list is similar to 1999 when Choco took over. In 1999 Port Adelaide went 12-10 and finished 7th after round 22.
5) There's a whole host of the non negotiables Primus reportedly presented in this thread here if you feel like contradicting yourself and the head coach
Enviable Tradition the sole goal of 2011 is to play the juniors and that's been put on record. It doesn't matter what happens to the rest of the club or the player list. It doesn't matter that a career spud like Leigh Brown can go on to establish a very good career at Collingwood because of good coaching and excellent systems/process
Yeah, it's just the senior's fault. everything since 2004 is all the senior's fault. Honestly