- Feb 12, 2017
- 18,390
- 48,629
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Tuohy sub would be my guess.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
LIVE: Sydney v Port Adelaide - 7:40 / 7:10 Fri
Squiggle tips Swans at 57% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
LIVE: Geelong v Brisbane Lions - 7:30PM Sat
Squiggle tips Cats at 54% chance -- What's your tip? -- Teams on Thurs »
Weekly Prize - Join Any Time - Tip Prelim Finals
The Golden Ticket - MCG and Marvel Medallion Club tickets and Corporate Box tickets at the Gabba, MCG and Marvel.
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Bews retains his spot. That's very strange.
Still though, it's weird to have him travel to Adelaide post injury unnecessarily if he's not going to play.Possibily... but SDK playing a full game on Saturday was a bit of a sign to me that we were happy with what we had and wanted to get more game time into him as we have the double chance.
Yeah because Bews is just too good to have as sub and is not an impact player suited to the sub role.Tuohy sub would be my guess.
Then why not put a decent player on Rioli.Is it? Rioli was the best forward on the ground last time we played them.
with you on this... if he wasn't fit, he wouldn't have travelled
Can’t really see a spot for DK this week and I don’t like him as the sub. Note that Blicays is on Sav and I like this as he will run him into the ground.About as melty as I can get is no DK and Bews in is perplexing. I understand the apparent positional imperative but just on “who would you rather” I’ve got to say DK.
Still though, it's weird to have him travel to Adelaide post injury unnecessarily if he's not going to play.
Would've thought him resting up at home for a semi/prelim final return, or even playing a half in the VFL would've been better for him in that case.
About as melty as I can get is no DK and Bews in is perplexing. I understand the apparent positional imperative but just on “who would you rather” I’ve got to say DK.
I'm just assuming they've got a lockdown role in mind for Bews so will want him on the entire game, otherwise why pick him? But he was the sub last match so maybe they've got other ideas.Yeah because Bews is just too good to have as sub and is not an impact player suited to the sub role.
It's a final, it's a flight to Adelaide, they'll be back in time for the VFL match on Saturday. Good to have the full compliment of traveling emergencies, just in case
Who do you have on Dixon? I’d have Blicavs on him.Can’t really see a spot for DK this week and I don’t like him as the sub. Note that Blicays is on Sav and I like this as he will run him into the ground.
But Bews is not small, he is an overly bulked up medium sized player at 286cm and at least 90kg and is no longer quick off the mark. Maybe they think his size is needed for Rioli. And not picking SDK means Kolo and JHenry need to play on talls. Hang on, Rioli is only 175cm.If Bews is the best small available to be the sub then so be it.
If he is tagged as aggressively at the centre bounce as he was in that other game he will get plenty of free kicks. Ball up checking seems to be more aggressively policed.
But Bews is not small, he is an overly bulked up medium sized player at 286cm and at least 90kg and is no longer quick off the mark. Maybe they think his size is needed for Rioli. And not picking SDK means Kolo and JHenry need to play on talls. Hang on, Rioli is only 175cm.