Play Nice Random Chat Thread VII

Remove this Banner Ad

Saving this screenshot forever because even I couldn't have demonstrated more perfectly the pervasive hostility that emanates from the clique;

1000014937.png
 
LOL no you haven't. You defended Elon multiple times against me and Warlord when we were (weirdly) united on the issue of how much he sucks.

From simping over his wealth;



To simping over the Twitter files and Elon standing up to social media companies "being in bed with the government" (which is curious because I haven't seen you say shit about Elon literally owning a social media company that he overtly used to campaign for Trump);



To regurgitating the nonsense about Elon "stopping mass censorship" ...



etc etc etc.

Then there's the posts of yours that suggesting people are wrong for disliking Musk, or whenever someone does criticise Musk, instead of agreeing with them, you always deflect and deny;

Example one:

View attachment 2189219

Example two:

View attachment 2189220



I can do this all day if you'd like. It's easy to find posts where you clearly defend and support Musk. It's genuinely difficult to find anything you've posted in the last 2~ years where you've criticised Musk.

None of that is me defending Elon. Simply stating the fact that he didn’t buy Twitter to make money, he bought it for influence.

And yes, Bezos is absolutely as bad as Elon, maybe worse considering what he put his workers through.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I just think of them as Rogan pilled. An irrational bag of misunderstandings, faux scepticism, edgelord nationalism but, above all, a sneering sense of satisfaction about the brainwashed while gulping down every bit of disinformation that is usually pumped up by Russian state cash.

Or, in picture form;

1000014939.jpg
 
None of that is me defending Elon. Simply stating the fact that he didn’t buy Twitter to make money, he bought it for influence.

And yes, Bezos is absolutely as bad as Elon, maybe worse considering what he put his workers through.

You seriously don’t see it? Twitter files had you posting 24/7. You showed examples of what you thought was bias within Twitter. Had some execs donated to dems.

Now that musk has literally bankrolled a Republican President? You’re literally quiet as a church mouse about it.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
[emoji[emoji6]][emoji6][emoji[emoji6][emoji6]][emoji6]" data-quote="Val Keating" data-source="post: 0" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch">
Absolutely.

I’m not being a dick, I’m really glad. We have some common ground.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
You seriously don’t see it? Twitter files had you posting 24/7. You showed examples of what you thought was bias within Twitter. Had some execs donated to dems.

Now that musk has literally bankrolled a Republican President? You’re literally quiet as a church mouse about it.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

No, my argument, and captain lockthread aka Chad, feel free to dig up the posts, but I bet you won’t because it doesn’t suit your agenda, was that type of bias and censorship is dangerous because the other side will inevitably gain control and use it in the exact same manner.
 
None of that is me defending Elon.

You have posted time and time and time again about how the big bad government conspired with big bad twitter to combat dangerous misinformation during a global pandemic, and foreign interference during a presidential election.

And yet, you posted precisely zero times about Elon and Twitter during this recent campaign.

1000014940.png
 
You have posted time and time and time again about how the big bad government conspired with big bad twitter to combat dangerous misinformation during a global pandemic, and foreign interference during a presidential election.

And yet, you posted precisely zero times about Elon and Twitter during this recent campaign.

View attachment 2189249

What’s there to say? He beat them at their own game, when morons were laughing at him for buying twitter at a loss, calling him an idiot, completely ignorant to the power it held.
 
What’s there to say? He beat them at their own game, when morons were laughing at him for buying twitter at a loss, calling him an idiot, completely ignorant to the power it held.

"wHy Do PeOpLe SaY i DeFeNd HiM?"
 
I’m not being a dick, I’m really glad. We have some common ground.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Everyone thinks Putin is a fascist.

Warlord repeatedly named the reporters he considered heros and role models who Putin had killed yet Captain Lockthread would respond to this by calling him a Putin lover.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Saving this screenshot forever because even I couldn't have demonstrated more perfectly the pervasive hostility that emanates from the clique;

View attachment 2189237
There's two people on this thread have generated this sort of hostility with me. The other one is tef.

You're in rare company.
 
Fox News is part of the biggest media corporation in the works and its ratings are up.

How do you explain this?


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
Why is TV called an idiot box?


The name has stuck for two reasons: a) TV has been a non interactive device that dulls the minds of those who watch it. b) It promotes a sedentary lifestyle and diminishes the imaginative power of the minds of those who watch it continuously. In depth research has been conducted in this regard.
 
Everyone thinks Putin is a fascist.

Is Trudeau a fascist?
Is Dan Andrews?
Is Joe Biden?

It sorta loses some believability and perspective when the word "fascist" gets used too loosely...

Warlord repeatedly named the reporters he considered heros and role models who Putin had killed yet Captain Lockthread would respond to this by calling him a Putin lover.

LOL not once did this ever happen.

Nice try though. Boy you guys love to lie.
 
There's two people on this thread have generated this sort of hostility with me. The other one is tef.

You're in rare company.

Cool.

Can you point to a single example of me ever outright abusing you? Calling you a dickhead or similar personal insults?

Because I can point to plenty of you doing that in reverse to me. Scroll up on this page for Example 1A.

It's funny how you clearly see yourself as some noble and reasonable person, when the reality is you are quick to anger whenever your worldview is challenged.
 
Which you obviously think is another example of fascist over reach ?


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
depends on motivation now doesn’t it, if he is about to sack a bunch of people because their jobs will become defunct because of technology, I’d call him a ruthless capitalist.
If they worked out that majority of those who worked from home are democrat voters and he was targeting them because political leanings, then sure he showing a all of his fasc.

But I think it’s the former rather then the latter, I think they’re cost cutting with no regard for the human capital in the middle.
 
You like your oligarchy and don't like another.

Elon Musk reportedly spent more money in this recent Presidential campaign than George Soros has ever spent in all his political donations ever.

Tell me again how they're both the same and Soros is evil or whatever.
 
What’s there to say? He beat them at their own game, when morons were laughing at him for buying twitter at a loss, calling him an idiot, completely ignorant to the power it held.

Hang on….what?

What’s the liberal (I won’t even mention left) equivalent of musk buying a social media company and literally bankrolling a campaign at the same time? What’s the ‘game’?

And if true, why weren’t you criticising right wing critics of ‘liberal’ Twitter for just being beat at the game?

Because it’s all equivalent yeah?


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
"wHy Do PeOpLe SaY i DeFeNd HiM?"
I've posted that article three times and asked you to respond to it. It balanced, reasoned and written by someone in Samoa at the time. A pro vaccination advocate who went there to report on the outbreak. He even gives RFK Jr a minor amount of criticism, something reasonable considering his actual role in the situation.

You haven't responded once.

Instead you do this shit.

Zero good faith from you.

LOL not once did this ever happen.

Nice try though. Boy you guys love to lie.

You repeatedly said he was simping for Putin after the first time he mentioned it.
 
Why is TV called an idiot box?


The name has stuck for two reasons: a) TV has been a non interactive device that dulls the minds of those who watch it. b) It promotes a sedentary lifestyle and diminishes the imaginative power of the minds of those who watch it continuously. In depth research has been conducted in this regard.

How is listening to Joe Rogan fumble his way into the dumbest shit for 3 hours a day any different?


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com
 
Cool.

Can you point to a single example of me ever outright abusing you? Calling you a dickhead or similar personal insults?

Because I can point to plenty of you doing that in reverse to me. Scroll up on this page for Example 1A.

It's funny how you clearly see yourself as some noble and reasonable person, when the reality is you are quick to anger whenever your worldview is challenged.
No, I'm quick to anger when people bully other people.
 
I've posted that article three times and asked you to respond to it. It balanced, reasoned and written by someone in Samoa at the time. A pro vaccination advocate who went there to report on the outbreak. He even gives RFK Jr a minor amount of criticism, something reasonable considering his actual role in the situation.

You haven't responded once.

Instead you do this shit.

Zero good faith from you.

I posted a video for you to watch and you haven't commented on it.

Ive read your article. I'll comment on it once you comment on the video. It's not a one way street.

You repeatedly said he was simping for Putin after the first time he mentioned it.

He constantly simped for Putin. But I reject the premise of your statement that I ever accused him of that in connection to murdered Russian journalists. That's you twisting the narrative maliciously because you can't win an argument on facts alone.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Play Nice Random Chat Thread VII

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top