Play Nice Random Chat Thread VII

[ferball]

Yes. The list of donors is public. You can check for yourself. I don't know why BBC phrased it like that, but Meta/Facebook/Zuckerberg did not donate to Biden's 2016 inauguration.

Of course not. No one did.

Well, other than the $750,000~ difference?

Yes - why is donating more money than most people make in a year okay for Biden and not for Trump?

Why not in terms of numbers? Because it derails your argument?

The size difference IS the issue for some of these lol.

Between Biden's inauguration and Trump's Amazon will have made more money than it did in its entire existence previously. Its a trivial amount of money for them.

What "stupid amounts" did Amazon or Bezos donate to Biden? You seem to think there's been some huge money from Bezos/Amazon to Biden but I can't find any from the list of donations...

Read the tweet you posted here you peanut.

 

[ferball]

So what?! It changes literally nothing about the topic of conversation.

It's being anal for absolute no gain other than an attempt to deflect.

For someone who claims they don't like Trump, my god you spend a lot of time defending him and attacking Democrats.

Quite the coincidence hmmmm.

How am I defending him? Neither of them should be defended.

You seem to claim that anyone who disagrees with you is defending your ideological enemies. If you had the power Stalin did you'd have a similar body count.

 

[Chadwiko]

Of course not. No one did.

No. This is quite simply not true. There were still massive amounts of donors. Just not the big tech companies who mostly didn't support Biden.

But plenty of other big corps did. Pfizer donated $1 mil by way of an example.

Yes - why is donating more money than most people make in a year okay for Biden and not for Trump?

I choose to believe this isn't a serious question. You're not actually dense enough to not believe there's a difference between a $250,000~ donation and a $1,000,000 donation.

Read the tweet you posted here you peanut.

Oh but you said it's misinformation. Now we're taking it as gospel?

You're bad at this, ferball. You're straight up bad at debating issues. You jump and change and twist and turn. And it's because it's clear you don't have a consistent position on any of the issues. You just want to argue to try and win. It's weird. Super weird.

 

[Chadwiko]

How am I defending him?

HOW ARE YOU NOT

Hahahahahahahahaha.

You are delusional.

If you had the power Stalin did you'd have a similar body count.

Is life in rural Tasmania really this boring? You enjoy coming into these threads to bully people, defend Trump, and play your little mental gymnastics games to try and impress your clique buddies?

Come back to reality, mate.

 

[ferball]

I said "we" shouldn't talk about him, and I meant all of us. Including me. Because I've been told that's what he wants. And since I have no reason to believe that is a lie, I'm trying to honour his wishes as they were explained to me by people I trust.

And if you weren't an authoritarian campaigner you would have said that at the start instead of trying to power trip people cos you don't like their opinions. So you talked about him and said other people shouldn't.

Not only are you an authoritarian campaigner, you're a hypocritical one as well.

Nah, you just don't like believing facts that challenge your narrow world view. It's something you clearly struggle deeply with.

You lie all the time. You call people anti semites, trump supporters, sovereign citizens (altho to be fair you may do that cos you you're not smart enough to follow what I'm actually saying,) anti vaxxers and any other stereotypical bullshit you can come up with to avoid engaging with them and those people aren't that.

You skitz out at facts you don;t agree with.

For example:

I'm gonna say that Pfizer donated 1 million bucks to Biden's inauguration then Bourla went to the white house and suddenly everyone needed a third dose of his vaccine. A month earlier his company had been adamant that only two doses were necessary. This eventually led to the resignation of the FDA Director (Dr M Gruber) and Deputy Director (Dr P Krause) of Vaccine Research and Review. According to Krause's testimony to congress in 2023 the White House was not in possession of any data that suggested a third dose of the Pfizer vaccine was necessary. (You'll note that this 2 dose maximum is officially the position of the Australian Gov right now as well.)

Now your response to this comment will be simply to laugh about cookers and anti vaxxers, then you'll call me one.

Despite the fact I got vaccinated for covid as soon as I could at my local GP and I'm basing this argument on the testimony of the Deputy Director of the FDA at the time.

You'll still do it in future as well, at every opportunity, cos that's the sort of disingenuous prick you are.

You'll completely ignore the fact that after his companies million dollar inauguration bribe Bourla went to the white house and conned Biden into giving his company a 50% increase in sales over what was necessary as well as the benefit of mandates for vaccination that followed and claim that its only Trump that people are bribing and only Trump is involved in this sort of corruption.

Because according to you only one side does this sort of shit not both sides.

 

[ferball]

No. This is quite simply not true. There were still massive amounts of donors. Just not the big tech companies who mostly didn't support Biden.

But plenty of other big corps did. Pfizer donated $1 mil by way of an example.

No, Biden wasn't inaugurated in 2016. i was just having a laugh at your typo.

But i already mentioned that Pfizer was one of those donors and you're about to read how it enabled them to corrupt the vaccination review process in the FDA, well, I bet you won't read that because its you can't handle the truth, not me.

I choose to believe this isn't a serious question. You're not actually dense enough to not believe there's a difference between a $250,000~ donation and a $1,000,000 donation.

They're both huge amounts of money, way beyond the scope of ordinary people.

Oh but you said it's misinformation. Now we're taking it as gospel?

You're bad at this, ferball. You're straight up bad at debating issues. You jump and change and twist and turn. And it's because it's clear you don't have a consistent position on any of the issues. You just want to argue to try and win. It's weird. Super weird.

I'm just working with the data you provided despite the lack of context you provided with it.

My point is there's no difference between trump getting these donations and Biden getting them. They both get them from powerful individuals and corporations who expect the donations will buy them influence.

Of course its disgusting that Trump gets them (twice) I don't understand why it isn't disgusting that Biden gets them as well.

 

[Chadwiko]

And if you weren't an authoritarian campaigner you would have said that at the start instead of trying to power trip people cos you don't like their opinions. So you talked about him and said other people shouldn't.

Not only are you an authoritarian campaigner, you're a hypocritical one as well.

The irony is that you're vastly more authoritarian than me.

You defend, justify, and borderline cheer for Russia's invasion in Ukraine.
You defend Trump constantly and deride the Democrats in the US.
You're so quick to abuse and insult anyone who dares to disagree with you, but then turn around and play the victim as soon as anything comes back your direction in response.
You judge me constantly for previous employment I did with VicPol, as if that employment tells you anything about my character. And this despite the fact that multiple times I've explained to you that my job was specifically designed to improve the very things you complain about when it comes to Policing.

Which one of us is the authoritarian?

You lie all the time. You call people anti semites, trump supporters, sovereign citizens (altho to be fair you may do that cos you you're not smart enough to follow what I'm actually saying,) anti vaxxers and any other stereotypical bullshit you can come up with to avoid engaging with them and those people aren't that.

This argument you're trying to make here would be a lot stronger if it didn't literally immediately follow you calling me an authoritarian, a dictator, someone who would have a Stalin-esque body count if I had power (???), on top of the other names like 'sociopath' or 'deranged' and all the other insults you've thrown at me.

I call out anti-semitism when I see anti-semitism. And really it's only one person and a pattern of posting over years. I don't think you're anti-semitic. I don't think DesertRoo is, or Dan, or Warlord, or any of the others who participate in this thread constantly. Just one person.

Now, as for the 'sovereign citizen' moniker? You yourself have said you have many sov-cit friends, you're sympathetic to their cause, and you share a lot of their beliefs. Am I "lying" about that?

You skitz out at facts you don;t agree with.

Ableist language. Nice.

For example:

I'm gonna say that Pfizer donated 1 million bucks to Biden's inauguration then Bourla went to the white house and suddenly everyone needed a third dose of his vaccine. A month earlier his company had been adamant that only two doses were necessary. This eventually led to the resignation of the FDA Director (Dr M Gruber) and Deputy Director (Dr P Krause) of Vaccine Research and Review. According to Krause's testimony to congress in 2023 the White House was not in possession of any data that suggested a third dose of the Pfizer vaccine was necessary. (You'll note that this 2 dose maximum is officially the position of the Australian Gov right now as well.)

Now your response to this comment will be simply to laugh about cookers and anti vaxxers, then you'll call me one.

No. I agree. Corporations donate to inaugurations because they want to curry favour with administrations. Which is exactly the point i've been making this whole time, but you were too focused on attacking me that you couldn't see that. Because that's what you do. You don't come here to debate issues. You come here solely to attack me.

 

[Val Keating]

Wasn’t SBF one of the biggest donors to the DNC ?

 

[ferball]

The irony is that you're vastly more authoritarian than me.

You defend, justify, and borderline cheer for Russia's invasion in Ukraine.

I've bagged Putin and listed his crimes here and on other sites for years. But that doesn't mean I am unable to recognise that this war would never have happened without US interference. In fact without that interference Ukraine and Russia would both have much closer ties to Europe and a stronger trading relationship. Putin would still be in power and all the things he is, in fact he and Russia would be in a stronger position, but that war would never have happened and those people who died because of it wouldn't have died because of it.

This doesn't make me authoritarian either. I don't power trip over people and when I have had authority (as an officer in the RFS i had extensive powers especially in emergencies,) I rarely used it and never abused it. Unlike other people I saw.

I've studied semantics and semiotics. The way you use language is an attempt to project power over other people. That's an authoritarian tendency.

You defend Trump constantly and deride the Democrats in the US.

I'm the one who had a thread dedicated to trump's incompetence during covid started because no one wanted my constant criticism of him clogging up the other covid thread. This is what i mean when I say that you think anyone who disgrees with you is defending someone you consider an ideological enemy. You see the world in complete binary terms and if we're not with you we're against you and all exactly the same. BTW That attitude is the basis of nearly every form of bigotry known to humanity.

I don't defend either of them cos they're both war mongers owned by corporate interests.

i did make a post on an SRP thread about the US election saying I was surprised how many of Harris' policies were actually reasonable and fair to working people tho. I doubt you've read but honestly my opinion of you is so low that it wouldn't surprise if you had read it and posted that comment anyway.

You're so quick to abuse and insult anyone who dares to disagree with you, but then turn around and play the victim as soon as anything comes back your direction in response.

You're the only person i do this to. It may be unfair of me but afaic you bring it on yourself by behaving like a campaigner. And how am I a victim?

You judge me constantly for previous employment I did with VicPol, as if that employment tells you anything about my character.

yes because working for the police does tell me something about your character, especially when I consider the way you use language at other people. If you were just abusive like me I'd have more trust for you.

And this despite the fact that multiple times I've explained to you that my job was specifically designed to improve the very things you complain about when it comes to Policing.

You're either ignorant enough to think you would have made a difference or you failed at your job. Vicpol are still racist, homophobic, transphobic and corrupt.

Which one of us is the authoritarian?




This argument you're trying to make here would be a lot stronger if it didn't literally immediately follow you calling me an authoritarian, a dictator, someone who would have a Stalin-esque body count if I had power (???), on top of the other names like 'sociopath' or 'deranged' and all the other insults you've thrown at me.

They all apply to you dickhead.

I call out anti-semitism when I see anti-semitism. And really it's only one person and a pattern of posting over years. I don't think you're anti-semitic. I don't think DesertRoo is, or Dan, or Warlord, or any of the others who participate in this thread constantly. Just one person.

You said DR and I were antisemitic because we wanted everyone from Australia who sevred with the IDF in Gaza to be investigated for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Val doesn't say anything that anyone else doesn't say and Funky scallop guy said he wanted to see Israel dissolved and replaced with a state managed and run by the UN. Which you have repeatedly said is an anti semitic position. Crickets from you about that.

Now, as for the 'sovereign citizen' moniker? You yourself have said you have many sov-cit friends, you're sympathetic to their cause, and you share a lot of their beliefs. Am I "lying" about that?

I know some sovereign citizens, not that many, some are friends, I've threatened to shoot one and I agree with the indigenous ones because they haven't ever ceded their sovereignty to the commonwealth. Frankly the others are a bit mental imo. I have said the Mabo decision makes the commonwealth an illegitimate entity because the transmission of law from the British parliament that enabled the formation of the Australian parliament is based on a legal falsehood. But that's a fact, not some sov-cit bullshit.

Ableist language. Nice.

I thought it was nice.

No. I agree. Corporations donate to inaugurations because they want to curry favour with administrations. Which is exactly the point i've been making this whole time, but you were too focused on attacking me that you couldn't see that. Because that's what you do. You don't come here to debate issues. You come here solely to attack me.

So wait a minute... you agree that Pfizer scammed the US, Australia, a bunch of other countries and that a third dose of the covid vaccination was unnecessary?

Cos every other time I or someone else has said that you carried on with that other shit - calling people cookers and whatnot.

 

[Val Keating]

I've bagged Putin and listed his crimes here and on other sites for years. But that doesn't mean I am unable to recognise that this war would never have happened without US interference. In fact without that interference Ukraine and Russia would both have much closer ties to Europe and a stronger trading relationship. Putin would still be in power and all the things he is, in fact he and Russia would be in a stronger position, but that war would never have happened and those people who died because of it wouldn't have died because of it.

This doesn't make me authoritarian either. I don't power trip over people and when I have had authority (as an officer in the RFS i had extensive powers especially in emergencies,) I rarely used it and never abused it. Unlike other people I saw.

I've studied semantics and semiotics. The way you use language is an attempt to project power over other people. That's an authoritarian tendency.



I'm the one who had a thread dedicated to trump's incompetence during covid started because no one wanted my constant criticism of him clogging up the other covid thread. This is what i mean when I say that you think anyone who disgrees with you is defending someone you consider an ideological enemy. You see the world in complete binary terms and if we're not with you we're against you and all exactly the same. BTW That attitude is the basis of nearly every form of bigotry known to humanity.

I don't defend either of them cos they're both war mongers owned by corporate interests.

i did make a post on an SRP thread about the US election saying I was surprised how many of Harris' policies were actually reasonable and fair to working people tho. I doubt you've read but honestly my opinion of you is so low that it wouldn't surprise if you had read it and posted that comment anyway.



You're the only person i do this to. It may be unfair of me but afaic you bring it on yourself by behaving like a campaigner. And how am I a victim?



yes because working for the police does tell me something about your character, especially when I consider the way you use language at other people. If you were just abusive like me I'd have more trust for you.



You're either ignorant enough to think you would have made a difference or you failed at your job. Vicpol are still racist, homophobic, transphobic and corrupt.



They all apply to you dickhead.



You said DR and I were antisemitic because we wanted everyone from Australia who sevred with the IDF in Gaza to be investigated for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Val doesn't say anything that anyone else doesn't say and Funky scallop guy said he wanted to see Israel dissolved and replaced with a state managed and run by the UN. Which you have repeatedly said is an anti semitic position. Crickets from you about that.



I know some sovereign citizens, not that many, some are friends, I've threatened to shoot one and I agree with the indigenous ones because they haven't ever ceded their sovereignty to the commonwealth. Frankly the others are a bit mental imo. I have said the Mabo decision makes the commonwealth an illegitimate entity because the transmission of law from the British parliament that enabled the formation of the Australian parliament is based on a legal falsehood. But that's a fact, not some sov-cit bullshit.



I thought it was nice.



So wait a minute... you agree that Pfizer scammed the US, Australia, a bunch of other countries and that a third dose of the covid vaccination was unnecessary?

Cos every other time I or someone else has said that you carried on with that other shit - calling people cookers and whatnot.

That’s a paddling.

 

[DesertRoo]

Trudeau is gone, another one who will never be able to walk the streets alone again….

 

[Scallop Industry Thug]

Trudeau is gone, another one who will never be able to walk the streets alone again….

‘It’s stupid mentioning individuals because both sides are the same’ guy is at it again lol.

Cmon man. Need a biolabs update. Pizzagate. Anything. Give me a link.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

 

[Chadwiko]

I've bagged Putin and listed his crimes here and on other sites for years. But that doesn't mean I am unable to recognise that this war would never have happened without US interference. In fact without that interference Ukraine and Russia would both have much closer ties to Europe and a stronger trading relationship. Putin would still be in power and all the things he is, in fact he and Russia would be in a stronger position, but that war would never have happened and those people who died because of it wouldn't have died because of it.

Blah blah blah blah... you're wrong. You're just straight up wrong. Blaming other nations for Russia's invasion provides Russia and Putin with justification and a blanket of cover and there's just no other way to describe it.

You think Russia was provoked and this justifies their invasion because you have authoritarian tendencies. It's really just that simple.

You see the world in complete binary terms and if we're not with you we're against you and all exactly the same.

This is hilarious hypocrisy from someone who thinks anyone who associates with Police should be written off as a good person forever.

Get some self-awareness, campaigner.

You're the only person i do this to. It may be unfair of me but afaic you bring it on yourself by behaving like a campaigner.

Yes, because it is the hallmark of authoritarianism. 'The rules and norms don't apply to me when I personally choose, and my individual perspective is the only one that matters and therefore I'm right'

Again. Thank you for making my case for me.

And how am I a victim?

You lack the self-awareness to recognise the contradiction I'm sure, but you straight up admit to derailing threads with insults and abuse... and then you have a giant sook and accuse other people of getting the threads locked. That's just one of the many ways you try and play the victim.

You're either ignorant enough to think you would have made a difference or you failed at your job. Vicpol are still racist, homophobic, transphobic and corrupt.

How would you know?

Seriously. How would you know? You haven't lived in Victoria for, what... 15-20 years? Something in that vicinity?

You have absolutely no idea when it comes to this shit. I'm 100% positive you'll pull the "oh yeah I know people in the community who tell me things!" card but that proves absolutely nothing.

You don't know anything about the enormously positive strides that VicPol made that I was directly responsible for, and how it's had genuine benefits in the community.

As one example, I personally and individually was responsible for Victoria Police's Chief Commissioner delivering the formal apology to the LGBTIQ+ community for past harm and discriminatory policing. I wrote his speech. I wrote his apology. I coordinated the events that surrounded it. I worked directly with community to ensure that what they needed to hear in the apology was in the apology. It was a massive success and hearing directly from previous LGBTIQ+ victims of harmful policing practices about how thankful they were and how much it meant to them is a highlight of my career. Hell, it won the ****ing annual Pride Community Initiative of the Year, which is voted on exclusively by people from that community.

You don't get to sit there and act like you know shit about this stuff when you don't. THAT'S authoritarian and bigoted shit. Look in the mirror.

You said DR and I were antisemitic because we wanted everyone from Australia who sevred with the IDF in Gaza to be investigated for war crimes and crimes against humanity.

No. I said that it was anti-semitic. I didn't say you were anti-semitic. I also said that it's a form of collective punishment which is... illegal. So I stand by that.
For someone who said they studied semantics, you're quite bad at them.

Val doesn't say anything that anyone else doesn't say

Yes, he does. And it's part of an established pattern.
And quite frankly, you don't get to sit there and tell me what is or isn't anti-semitism. What kind of arrogance is that? For someone who likes to position themselves as a righteous authority on this stuff, you should know better.
Through a lifetime of lived experience I've developed a strong radar for anti-semitism, and I am telling you that Val is pinging that radar like a god-damn slow moving giant blimp.

Funky scallop guy said he wanted to see Israel dissolved and replaced with a state managed and run by the UN.

Eh, I didn't take his statement to mean he wanted to see "Israel" totally gone. More that he wanted regime change.

Either way, it's ironic that you're calling me out for not challenging someone about these things. I've literally not seen you ONCE disagree with anyone from your clique, whereas I've respectfully disagreed with Scallop several times in this very thread. Go back and check if you'd like.

I have said the Mabo decision makes the commonwealth an illegitimate entity because the transmission of law from the British parliament that enabled the formation of the Australian parliament is based on a legal falsehood. But that's a fact, not some sov-cit bullshit.

Yeah, nah. That is precisely sov-cit bullshit.

"The formation of Australian parliament is based on a legal falsehood". Hahaha. Okay.

So wait a minute... you agree that Pfizer scammed the US, Australia, a bunch of other countries and that a third dose of the covid vaccination was unnecessary?

No I was agreeing that Pfizer was specifically donating to the inauguration to curry favour as a form of legal political bribes. Which they, and all companies who do similar, do.

I disagree that the third dose was unnecessary, but also I don't really care... Vaccinations are good. Vaccinations are safe. I have no interest entering into a discussion with you on that topic.

 

[DesertRoo]

‘It’s stupid mentioning individuals because both sides are the same’ guy is at it again lol.

Cmon man. Need a biolabs update. Pizzagate. Anything. Give me a link.


Sent from my iPhone using BigFooty.com

What are you trying to say here? is Trudeau is your man in Montreal and you are upset at him going?

 

[Val Keating]

Blah blah blah blah... you're wrong. You're just straight up wrong. Blaming other nations for Russia's invasion provides Russia and Putin with justification and a blanket of cover and there's just no other way to describe it.

You think Russia was provoked and this justifies their invasion because you have authoritarian tendencies. It's really just that simple.




This is hilarious hypocrisy from someone who thinks anyone who associates with Police should be written off as a good person forever.

Get some self-awareness, campaigner.



Yes, because it is the hallmark of authoritarianism. 'The rules and norms don't apply to me when I personally choose, and my individual perspective is the only one that matters and therefore I'm right'

Again. Thank you for making my case for me.



You lack the self-awareness to recognise the contradiction I'm sure, but you straight up admit to derailing threads with insults and abuse... and then you have a giant sook and accuse other people of getting the threads locked. That's just one of the many ways you try and play the victim.



How would you know?

Seriously. How would you know? You haven't lived in Victoria for, what... 15-20 years? Something in that vicinity?

You have absolutely no idea when it comes to this shit. I'm 100% positive you'll pull the "oh yeah I know people in the community who tell me things!" card but that proves absolutely nothing.

You don't know anything about the enormously positive strides that VicPol made that I was directly responsible for, and how it's had genuine benefits in the community.

As one example, I personally and individually was responsible for Victoria Police's Chief Commissioner delivering the formal apology to the LGBTIQ+ community for past harm and discriminatory policing. I wrote his speech. I wrote his apology. I coordinated the events that surrounded it. I worked directly with community to ensure that what they needed to hear in the apology was in the apology. It was a massive success and hearing directly from previous LGBTIQ+ victims of harmful policing practices about how thankful they were and how much it meant to them is a highlight of my career. Hell, it won the ****ing annual Pride Community Initiative of the Year, which is voted on exclusively by people from that community.

You don't get to sit there and act like you know shit about this stuff when you don't. THAT'S authoritarian and bigoted shit. Look in the mirror.



No. I said that it was anti-semitic. I didn't say you were anti-semitic. I also said that it's a form of collective punishment which is... illegal. So I stand by that.
For someone who said they studied semantics, you're quite bad at them.



Yes, he does. And it's part of an established pattern.
And quite frankly, you don't get to sit there and tell me what is or isn't anti-semitism. What kind of arrogance is that? For someone who likes to position themselves as a righteous authority on this stuff, you should know better.
Through a lifetime of lived experience I've developed a strong radar for anti-semitism, and I am telling you that Val is pinging that radar like a god-damn slow moving giant blimp.



Eh, I didn't take his statement to mean he wanted to see "Israel" totally gone. More that he wanted regime change.

Either way, it's ironic that you're calling me out for not challenging someone about these things. I've literally not seen you ONCE disagree with anyone from your clique, whereas I've respectfully disagreed with Scallop several times in this very thread. Go back and check if you'd like.



Yeah, nah. That is precisely sov-cit bullshit.

"The formation of Australian parliament is based on a legal falsehood". Hahaha. Okay.



No I was agreeing that Pfizer was specifically donating to the inauguration to curry favour as a form of legal political bribes. Which they, and all companies who do similar, do.

I disagree that the third dose was unnecessary, but also I don't really care... Vaccinations are good. Vaccinations are safe. I have no interest entering into a discussion with you on that topic.

Get ****ed campaigner. I’m not anti Semitic. I have become anti Israeli because they’re committing genocide.

 

[Val Keating]

 

[Chadwiko]

Trudeau was an undeniably good leader who led Canada for over a decade.

Was he perfect? No. No politician is. But he was an honourable and well-intentioned leader and that's increasingly rare.

Ten plus years as leader of a country is rare these days, so it was always going to end sooner or later. And endings are rarely smooth.

But anyone acting like Trudeau was some tyrant or bad-leader is clueless, or a conservative hater. Because the facts are quite undeniable otherwise.

 

[Val Keating]

The dogs got him out

 

[Val Keating]

“Ms. Pinheiro has faced serious threats, including threats to her life, doxxing, sexist slurs, and even threats directed toward her daughter.”

Dead set scum.

 

[Chadwiko]

Get ****ed campaigner. I’m not anti Semitic. I have become anti Israeli because they’re committing genocide.

And if that was where your criticism of Jews started and ended, then I wouldn't be calling you anti-semitic.

But you believe and repost a myriad of other Jewish conspiracies.

Basically everyone in here is against the genocide being committed by Israel, other than that weird Chip Scab dude who I ignore. Do you see me accusing anyone else of being anti-semitic? No.

Only you. For a reason.

 

[Val Keating]

And if that was where your criticism of Jews started and ended, then I wouldn't be calling you anti-semitic.

But you believe and repost a myriad of other Jewish conspiracies.

Basically everyone in here is against the genocide being committed by Israel, other than that weird Chip Scab dude who I ignore. Do you see me accusing anyone else of being anti-semitic? No.

Only you. For a reason.

Because I think that Epstein and Maxwell were in with Mossad?

And that I know that Israel has worked with Jihadists? Which they themselves have admitted to?

Again, get ****ed.

 

[Chadwiko]

And that I know that Israel has worked with Jihadists? Which they themselves have admitted to?

NO. They haven't admitted to that. And this has been explained to you many, many, many times. And the fact you either cannot or choose not to understand the difference is part of why I think you're a racist.

Here's a perfect opportunity for ferball to come in and do what he accuses me of never doing, and challenge/correct someone on 'his side'.

I won't hold my breath though. In fact, I'd bet the opposite will happen and he'll come in and agree with/defend Val.

Thus proving my point.

 

[Val Keating]

NO. They haven't admitted to that. And this has been explained to you many, many, many times. And the fact you either cannot or choose not to understand the difference is part of why I think you're a racist.

Here's a perfect opportunity for ferball to come in and do what he accuses me of never doing, and challenge/correct someone on 'his side'.

I won't hold my breath though. In fact, I'd bet the opposite will happen and he'll come in and agree with/defend Val.

Thus proving my point.

I have posted multiple articles with proof the idf worked with jihadists.

 

[Chadwiko]

I have posted multiple articles with proof the idf worked with jihadists.

No, you haven't.

You've posted articles that you think say that. But they don't. And I have explained to you multiple times how they don't.

And you either choose to ignore it, or you lack the intelligence required to understand it. But the end result is the same.

 

[bengrina]

Because I think that Epstein and Maxwell were in with Mossad?

And that I know that Israel has worked with Jihadists? Which they themselves have admitted to?

Again, get ****ed.

Val I wouldn’t waste your time with the back and forth regarding anti semitism. No one believes this

From a personal perspective it means a lot to see how effected you have also felt at what Israel have been doing to the people of Palestine.

Use that energy and focus in positive ways by continuing to hold them accountable for their actions and hopefully contribute to a brighter future for those less fortunate.