Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Draft pick #39 for #47 Epic win!
TRADE WEEK: First trade done for the morning and it's a big one. West Coast trades pick 55 to Sydney in exchange for pick 118. That's huge!
He will go off like a frog in a sock. He is hard at it and a real terrier. I was really surprised/happy you guys managed to pick him up. Hell be great.I think we did quite well, not sold on McGlynn but he only cost the price of a pack of Tic-Tac's so can't complain really.
But the way the club went about it's business was great, some of the other mobs were pathetic, 3 in particular.
SYDNEY
GAIN: Mark Seaby (right), Shane Mumford,
Josh Kennedy, Ben McGlynn.
Picks 14, 55
LOSE: Amon Buchanan, Barry Hall,Darren Jolly.
Picks 22, 70, 118
GRADE: C+
Jolly is a massive loss and the fact the Swans were beaten to Fev by Brisbane wasn't the best result, despite Roosy claiming no interest. Paid overs for Mumford but he has promise, while Kennedy will be suited by Sydney's game style.
DRAFT ORDER: 6, 14, 38, 54, 55, 86
The Herald Sun trade week report card.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/trade-week-report-card/story-e6frf9jf-1225785213602
I really Dont agree!
The Herald Sun trade week report card.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/trade-week-report-card/story-e6frf9jf-1225785213602
I really Dont agree!
I'm sorry, a C+ for not chasing a liability of a player and for being very cooperative and welcoming with a players desire for a better work/life balance?
Prob more than the Daily Terror reported on the Swans trade week performance though...
EDIT: They gave Adelaide an F for not taking part. It's not compulsory, plus if you're happy with your list and picks, why bother trading?
They also gave Hawthorn an A and frankly I think they got completely done over in the Trade period, which can be backed up by the general negative feedback from Hawks supporters.
I second The Paranormal's last sentence. :thumsbsd:
C+ was very generous with or without Fev, we should have been ready for the trade at the very least and we werent Roos admitted that himself and gotta admire the Saints for not bending over for collingwood, and I think when dealing with the dogs we should have thrown money at Lake(how good would he be down back) who was struggling to fit in their cap, ok Im happy with Mumford but we paid way too much, Seaby we would have got in the PSD, bahh I could go on and on but you guys know better than me, dont get me wrong Im behind our new players 100% but to say our 'trading' was above average is a very blinkered view imo..
(this is rate the 'trading' thread)
C+ was very generous with or without Fev, we should have been ready for the trade at the very least and we werent Roos admitted that himself and gotta admire the Saints for not bending over for collingwood, and I think when dealing with the dogs we should have thrown money at Lake(how good would he be down back) who was struggling to fit in their cap, ok Im happy with Mumford but we paid way too much, Seaby we would have got in the PSD, bahh I could go on and on but you guys know better than me, dont get me wrong Im behind our new players 100% but to say our 'trading' was above average is a very blinkered view imo..
(this is rate the 'trading' thread)