Replay Richmond vs Adelaide

[lunacy]

Hey guys, I'm just wondering whether you think the full replay of last weeks trial will be up on richmondfc website? I know the quality wasn't great when streaming it live, but the vision of the richmond/hawks replay looked pretty good quality.

If so when do you think it would likely be up? Thanks

 

[lunacy]

Cheers

 

[PHX]

Havent heard anything at all.

Given our display maybe the file was "accidently deleted" or "corrupted".

 

[Jisha]

The last couple have been put on the website the within a week of the game, being a public holiday maybe give it an extra day or two

 

[Richo URA Star]

They should discreetly bin the footage. It was that bad.

 

[Rustof]

We didn't play last week... Must've been a dream... Or a nightmare...

 

[Danog]

Bin the 1st and 4th quarter footage.

 

[SleepingGiant]

I went to the game. Adelaide put the burners on and off when necessary.

 

[Danog]

We also changed from playing zone to playing man on man. We played better man on man.

 

[RFC_Official]

Up now

 

[W. Smithers]

Might watch it tonight as part of my horror movie triple play. The Exorcist, The Shining and leaving the scariest till last, Adelaide v. Richmond.

Apparently they didn't use special effects to make Daniel Jackson's disposal look that bad!!!

 

[smasha]

We also changed from playing zone to playing man on man. We played better man on man.

We always do man on man.

Footballers play football not chess.

Man on man is a Richmond trademark.

AS soon as we do the ****y zone FECKINg GAY shit,we fall apart.

I will never get zoning i.e. leaving an opponent on his own unaccounted.

THAT JUST DOES MY BLOODY HEAD IN.

Sorry but it's a soft way to play football.

In fact it goes against everything Australian Rules stands for.

If each player stuck to their opponent it defeats the zone.

SOMEONE TELL ME WHY THE ZONE IS BETTER THAN MAN ON MAN?

How can an opposing team win zoning,if we play man on man?


Still shake my head at the shitty modern way of doing things.

BRING REAL FOOTY BACK!

By the time we perfect our system of zoning,there will be a new system.

I can't for the grace of God ,know why Zoning is better than man on man.

Sorry.

It's a cheating system.

If players played man on man and got beat,it would still fast track thier development than running around on thir own not minding an opposition player.

Sorry.

ZONING SUCKS THE BIG POOHOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Football is a game of instinct not ****ing chess.

"If opposition player moves to so and so,I will move to my designated spot."

LMAOOOOOOOOOO.

I want our players to grow some ****ing balls and stick to their opponents FFS.

 

[delediofan3]

We always do man on man.

Footballers play football not chess.

Man on man is a Richmond trademark.

AS soon as we do the ****y zone FECKINg GAY shit,we fall apart.

I will never get zoning i.e. leaving an opponent on his own unaccounted.

THAT JUST DOES MY BLOODY HEAD IN.

Sorry but it's a soft way to play football.

In fact it goes against everything Australian Rules stands for.

If each player stuck to their opponent it defeats the zone.

SOMEONE TELL ME WHY THE ZONE IS BETTER THAN MAN ON MAN?

How can an opposing team win zoning,if we play man on man?


Still shake my head at the shitty modern way of doing things.

BRING REAL FOOTY BACK!

By the time we perfect our system of zoning,there will be a new system.

I can't for the grace of God ,know why Zoning is better than man on man.

Sorry.

It's a cheating system.

If players played man on man and got beat,it would still fast track thier development than running around on thir own not minding an opposition player.

Sorry.

ZONING SUCKS THE BIG POOHOLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Football is a game of instinct not ****ing chess.

"If opposition player moves to so and so,I will move to my designated spot."

LMAOOOOOOOOOO.

I want our players to grow some ****ing balls and stick to their opponents FFS.

LOL a bit angry there. there are only two systems... man on man and a zone.