Ross Lyon- Hate Thread.

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
I still maintain, that signing up Lyon for the long haul would have been a very risky proposition and I think that Freo have a significant risk with what they've done.

Does anyone know what RL's "plan B" is?
How did the tweaks to the game plan go?

I wouldnt have said to sack him, but the long term contract should not have been on the table.
 
I still maintain, that signing up Lyon for the long haul would have been a very risky proposition and I think that Freo have a significant risk with what they've done.

Does anyone know what RL's "plan B" is?
How did the tweaks to the game plan go?

I wouldnt have said to sack him, but the long term contract should not have been on the table.

Agree completely, I would have been disappointed if he'd been given another 4 years. I wouldn't even want Malthouse signed for 4 years.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

I'm not closing the thread but isn't it time to move on?

He's not my favourite person in the world but given we've got a new coach and some new arrivals surely it's best to look ahead.
 
Surely its better that we have this **** you Ross thread.
Rather than going home and smacking round our wives and children.

You have anger issues brother.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

I know what SS means though (though I obviously deplore his example! tut, tut, SS!). Gee, the loss of Walsh really burns. All Lyon had to flipping do is flipping play Walsh when we were playing flipping teams like the flipping Suns or the flipping Kangas. We would have flipping won anyway. And he would have been happy enough from that to have signed a contract with us MONTHS ago! Instead, it even had to COME to this flipping debacle.

Oh well, thankfully he's gone, now, and we won't have him flipping stuffing everything up for us again.
 
anyone get the feeling Ross was positioning himself for a move early in the year, say after the Schoolgirl and NZ incidents.

We start poorly, tried a few young guys and with a poor win/loss situation he seemed to have gone back to the old brigade and stopped playing the young guy's. Could have and should have played Walsh, Stanley etc etc however seemed hell bent to use older players just get the wins up (which is fine) to give him a stronger bargaining position with Saints or any other clubs by year end.

In the meantime he didn't get Walsh or those guys a game and we have been burnt now.
 
anyone get the feeling Ross was positioning himself for a move early in the year, say after the Schoolgirl and NZ incidents.

We start poorly, tried a few young guys and with a poor win/loss situation he seemed to have gone back to the old brigade and stopped playing the young guy's. Could have and should have played Walsh, Stanley etc etc however seemed hell bent to use older players just get the wins up (which is fine) to give him a stronger bargaining position with Saints or any other clubs by year end.

In the meantime he didn't get Walsh or those guys a game and we have been burnt now.

Thats almost word-for-word exactly what Francis Leach said last night on SEN's Soapbox...

I tend to agree in part, but some of the kids did get injuries & the old briggade had to come back in in some instances
 
Thats almost word-for-word exactly what Francis Leach said last night on SEN's Soapbox...

I tend to agree in part, but some of the kids did get injuries & the old briggade had to come back in in some instances

heard the same thing.

he got Pelchin in after 6pm, and they discussed the kids, and pelchin, said that development would be much more robust, and an increas of over 300% for 1st year and 2nd year kids.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top