KermitJagger
Professional Thread Derailer
- May 17, 2017
- 16,364
- 53,580
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
All I was eluding to was Hartigan is a gap in our line-up. Either that is agreed or disagreed upon.
Some people think Hartigan is adequate taking us forward it seems. I hope Sam sees that differently.
We had those numbers partly due to personnel, and partly due to our defensive minded gameplan. AC protected the back 6 as much as he could. The by product of that was us being very poor defensively.
Again, Hartigan is a budget option, who needs replacing if we want to be successful.
Sent from my SM-G960F using Tapatalk
I'm not even sure what you're arguing - you're talking about the Clarkson game plan protecting our back 6, despite the fact we conceded the most inside 50s and therefore potential looks at goal in the AFL for most of the year. I'm sure Hartigan felt incredibly protected as the ball streamed in time after time.
As Bris said, your original post was that Hartigan conceded too many goals, when provided proof that he didn't actually concede that many goals you shifted to talking about Hartigan being a budget option with limited shelf life. No one was saying that he wasn't those things, and any argument against him being a poor defender is not also an argument that he's a long term solution for the club in that position.
He's the best we've got in the position now and it doesn't make us a better team to not play him for the sake of it.
Last edited: