- Jun 21, 2009
- 26,776
- 33,452
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
As always. Rolls RoyceOnly 19 possies and 81 in DT
He go at 100%?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
As always. Rolls RoyceOnly 19 possies and 81 in DT
He go at 100%?
Week one sans Grawndy doesn't validate the decision, but it looks like it won't break my neck straight up.
Grundy owners: The score only stays in for one price change.
Jelwood- 98 (ill take it since he got there even with 52% DE, 6 clangers)
Danger - 94 (VC fail, but still could have been alot more he also had only 59% DE and 6 clangers)
Kelly- 106 , happy with that despite fact he basically did nothing in 2nd quarter, looks a top 6 forward easy, happy with wat im seeing
Constable- 85 ! Ill take that as M8 and happy with last min swap from Scott
Clark- 69, take that for a Def rookie
Crisps- 83, not that good for my D1, but again not bad, happy with the selection still
Grundy- 81, fail but it's first game, not panicing
Luke Dahlhaus interested me tonight. Looked like the Dahl of 2016 and prior who was a consistent lock for top 6 forward.
Was keen on Nankenstein till big Balta came on the scene, English is one of three possibles for me, too. Super-talented, great skills for a big bloke, has put on a bit of size.I'm backing in The English Patient.
Whats 5 frees against in SC?
SameConfident of being in the top ranked 190,000 after Rnd 1
Spot on, the early crow always ends in tears, humility the way to go, especially with 21.5 rds of Grawndy to play out.Yep. Was afraid the season would be over with a 160+ captain option that I didn't take.
The people going on about not taking him are making me rage - he's only going to curse us with 2x 140s from here to average 120 at the first price change if they keep it up!