- Aug 30, 2017
- 16,322
- 67,560
- AFL Club
- St Kilda
I agree - but they have as much, if not more cred, than people stating the "eye test" or "potential" as a differential between players.
The stats bear out the obvious - the Long to HBF experiment is worth persevering with but ATM Long is not a significant upgrade on DMac.
You are correct, there is not a lot of difference between DMac & Long statistically speaking. Arguably there isn’t a lot of difference on their performances to date either. But Ratts plays blokes that he believes will be part of his gameplan going forward. He sees potential & backs in the players instead of playing tried & tested old Richo boots that been part of a consistent failure of a club for the past half a dozen years. Mckenzie, Savage, etc are the past & only backup, Long, Coffield & Paton have been part of a winning formula are the new black. No idea why you want to change that. Richo days were not the glory days with DMac sending worm burners onto Paddy’s tit. They are gone. Onwards & upwards.
Last edited: