He’s definitely good value but you don’t really need value at this time of the year unless you won’t be able to afford anyone else, or are considering a M9, then it’s a great pick. Personally there is no way I would risk picking him thinking he would be a keeper if I could afford an extra 70k for Walsh.
Can you swing things around for Himmelberg? Dare I say Cripps is very cheap.
I assume people are hoping he’ll go back to playing his best role.
Sicily is the only must have player you don’t have, hold Weddle until he comes back and then downgrade weddle, upgrade sheezel
I’d trade Weddle before Seamus.
Depends on team structure. Walsh hasn't really hit his straps either. For me, the extra $$$ is the difference between saving a trade so I think I am going to punt on Mills getting rolling in the latter half of the season. So far this has not worked out for me with Steele, though Brayshaw has come good off a low price.
Plenty of $$ on the bench with Atkins, TT, and Johnson, and you already have Steele, why risk Mills. Better off downgrading Johnson and upgrading to an Uber premo who’s a sure thing
Don’t get me wrong I wouldn’t be too keen on bringing Walsh in either if price wasn’t a concern, but I think Walsh is a far better option than Mills. Tonned up 7 times vs 2, isn’t coming off an injury, and we know exactly what his role is. But if trades or $$ are a concern then there are far worse options than Mills. But with Steele it becomes even riskier because having 2 potentially underperforming premos in your team will be huge come seasons end. I’m more so talking about people bringing him in purely because he’s a ‘bargain’ even though they could afford to spend 600k, now isn’t the time to save money and trades that you might have to fix later unless you really have to.
I had same problem and dumped Humphrey - shocking today and has Pies and Power up nextNot sure who to trade out of Ashcroft and Humphrey?
And who to bring in out of Mills or Himmelberg or someone else around their price?
View attachment 1722001
