Round 3 Trades

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
You are getting Ryan but cutting JOM to get him who is on the park and still has a decent upside to his scoring and cash making potential as he builds fitness.
He is playing Holman on the bench.
Jom on the field averaging less.
I'd totally trade jom for a forward and push a spud forward off the field.
Jom on the bench is to much cash IMO.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

You are getting Ryan but cutting JOM to get him who is on the park and still has a decent upside to his scoring and cash making potential as he builds fitness.
I politely disagree.
Eddy last year I would point at for reference.
Peeps that held failed.....
Its a guess either way tbh but I say keep as many of your 30 playing as you can.
will you bring him back if he gets named in a month?
It is a guess really, just think GWS have a spot for a small fwd. he has played okay and value is there...but not if he is traded out.
 
will you bring him back if he gets named in a month?
It is a guess really, just think GWS have a spot for a small fwd. he has played okay and value is there...but not if he is traded out.
Trade him out for an earner now.
Then wait and see.
You may never go there again.
But if you select the correct rooky to go to now.
You could be 200k ahead by the time he comes back in.
Yes zgl will go up eventually on his return.
But you lose the earlier cash bonus completely.
 
You are getting Ryan but cutting JOM to get him who is on the park and still has a decent upside to his scoring and cash making potential as he builds fitness.
He is playing Holman on the bench.
Jom on the field averaging less.
I'd totally trade jom for a forward and push a spud forward off the field.
Jom on the bench is to much cash IMO.
there is more to the JOM trade down.
With no bank and Danger looking good now(had my doubts he was injury free) I'm also looking to build some bank.
I can get from a rookie what JOM has been giving me and have some coin in the bank too.
 
Do people really expect second year players like Fisher and Taranto to keep on scoring so highly? I'd like to trade them in but i can see them tapering off...
 
there is more to the JOM trade down.
With no bank and Danger looking good now(had my doubts he was injury free) I'm also looking to build some bank.
I can get from a rookie what JOM has been giving me and have some coin in the bank too.
I can't use this tactic personally.
To much of a temptation to trade twice each week if I carry cash.
Not much self control.....
 
Do people really expect second year players like Fisher and Taranto to keep on scoring so highly? I'd like to trade them in but i can see them tapering off...
I don't see them scoring at the same rate no.
But in fishers case he is almost rooky priced.
I'd much prefer him on the field over fritzl gartlett and co.
That's his temptation for me.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Do people really expect second year players like Fisher and Taranto to keep on scoring so highly? I'd like to trade them in but i can see them tapering off...

Taranto averaging 90 seems plausible. Was getting lots of midfield time with Whitfield going down back. Can't see that getting taken away with Scully going down and no one to come back and push him out of his spot. Talented player, question was always on fitness and opportunity and he seems to have both this year. Funnily enough it looks like himself + cogs may take away from Kelly's potential this year
 
Taranto averaging 90 seems plausible. Funnily enough it looks like himself + cogs may take away from Kelly's potential this year
Agree. thought kelly would go up a notch this year but is looking like an expensive premo. Not bad enough to trade but not great value.
 
Taranto averaging 90 seems plausible. Was getting lots of midfield time with Whitfield going down back. Can't see that getting taken away with Scully going down and no one to come back and push him out of his spot. Talented player, question was always on fitness and opportunity and he seems to have both this year. Funnily enough it looks like himself + cogs may take away from Kelly's potential this year

No, it wasn't.

He ran a 15.9 in the beep at the draft camp. He finished 5th in his first ever 3km time trial at the Giants.
 
Being in NSW we get GWS and Sydney's games on free to air regardless of whether they are FTA games or not.
I've watched both GWS games with keen interest and Taranto has looked the real deal. Sadly at the cost of Kelly going forward a lot which has hurt him thus far. This round gone could've been a shocker if he didn't lay 14 or so tackles. I'd love to sideways Kelly to Dusty but going to trust my gut that his class will shine through still. However I am concerned with Hibberd and plan on trading him to Taranto, with Sicily going to defence. Similar scoring outputs, just different end of the ground and saves me $200k for the Danger/Dusty fund.

Sicily annoyed me no end on Monday and originally was going to just trade him to Taranto, but I looked at his games post-bye last year when he had the role change.
He scored 93, 87, 109, 46, 104, 97, 130, 107, 25, 116 in the final 10 rounds.
The 25 was a shocker against Carlton with 10 clangers and 7 frees against while the 46 was against Geelong who quite obviously target him as shown on Monday. The consistency otherwise is good and for 400k holds good value so those looking at trading him, I recommend a hold.
 
Last edited:
I have the same decision to make. Tempted to hold hibberd and back him in but I'm not happy with him at all at the moment and i don't want to fall too far off the pace.

Still 50/50 on what to do with him
I'm holding.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top