If you were to drop a player to bring in Josh P Kennedy out of Steel Sidebottom and Patrick Dangerfield, which would it be?
IMO ill drop ss
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
If you were to drop a player to bring in Josh P Kennedy out of Steel Sidebottom and Patrick Dangerfield, which would it be?
Vlaustin to hutchins for gcs avg 82.50
Sidebottom. I have danger and think/hope he will turn it around shortly. Has come up against three good taggers in Hocking, Raines and Cornes(also spent a chunk of time on the pine after his injury yesterday, hurting his score). Will obviously continue to cop the tag but his first 3 weeks were pretty tough and i expect/ need him to respondIf you were to drop a player to bring in Josh P Kennedy out of Steel Sidebottom and Patrick Dangerfield, which would it be?
Don't know what you are looking at, but it will cost you money to swap Zorko for Westhoff or Bartel. I'd take Bartel. More consistent and a proven performer. I bought him in last week for Watts.After trading K.Mitchell to Crouch i now have $569,800 to spend on a FWD to replace Zorko, question is who to bring in????
1) Westhoff and pocket $69,600
2) Monfries and pocket $159,100
3) Bartel and pocket $25,300
Don't know what you are looking at, but it will cost you money to swap Zorko for Westhoff or Bartel. I'd take Bartel.
I'd go Westhoff. Keep Danger. Will turn it around, Hodge wont be top 8-10 mids end of seasonThree trade options:
Blicvas -> Leuenberger to become R2 (think his trade is a lock)
Zorko -> Westhoff
Dangerfield -> Hodge
Leaning towards Westhoff, only because he'll go up another 60-70k next week whereas Hodge only 25-35k.
Which would you make? And why?
Dal Spudo for FyfeSpud Porko for Buddy
Dal Spudo for Fyfe
Heath Shaw averages 100 every year, always struggles against the hawks but will come back out as usual and dominate. I think t is a waste of a trade.Traded H. Shaw out for Hanley, cheaper and will get more points; although I might get someone other than Hanley
I'm considering selling Dangerfield but if I do he will probably have a great game like Martin did when I traded him out.
Sidebottom. I have danger and think/hope he will turn it around shortly. Has come up against three good taggers in Hocking, Raines and Cornes(also spent a chunk of time on the pine after his injury yesterday, hurting his score). Will obviously continue to cop the tag but his first 3 weeks were pretty tough and i expect/ need him to respond
i've got Shaw and Dangerfield and am holding onto bothTraded H. Shaw out for Hanley, cheaper and will get more points; although I might get someone other than Hanley
I'm considering selling Dangerfield but if I do he will probably have a great game like Martin did when I traded him out.
Yes your exactly right, Picken and Lower are handy at there craft. Although Cotchin did run rings around Lower yesterday! He copped the tag at times last year and was able to still score well in those games, im just hoping he lifts from here on no matter who sits on him as i wont be sideways trading him to anyone.Heath Shaw averages 100 every year, always struggles against the hawks but will come back out as usual and dominate. I think t is a waste of a trade.
Pity he will come up against Lower/Picken this week who aint to shabby themselves
Yes your exactly right, Picken and Lower are handy at there craft. Although Cotchin did run rings around Lower yesterday! He copped the tag at times last year and was able to still score well in those games, im just hoping he lifts from here on no matter who sits on him as i wont be sideways trading him to anyone.
You're probably right about it being a waste of a trade. IMO Shaw was a waste of a selection. He was never going to improve that average. Hanley, Heppell, Gibbs, Duffield, Hartlett were all backs on the improve. Each of those will average a score off 100+, or close to, for the year and make you some cash along the way as well. If you've got Shaw already, I'd stick with him, although if you've been saving trades and have a few up your sleeve, a sideways to Hanley a pretty good move.Heath Shaw averages 100 every year, always struggles against the hawks but will come back out as usual and dominate. I think t is a waste of a trade.
I think Sinclair can hold his spot until NicNat returns. Its his spot to lose for mine.How long do people think Callum Sinclair will stick around for? I assume he will stick around until Nic Nat is back which from the sounds of it won't be till atleast Round 10. Or should I be worried about Lycett pushing him out? Thinking of downgrading Varcoe to Sinclair then moving Rowe to the forward line.