Round 4 trades

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Vlaustin to hutchins for gcs avg 82.50

Hutchins has only had 13 possessions in each of his 2 games, his tackle rate is up but as far as getting the ball goes he's pretty ordinary. Buyer Beware as i think there are better options available
 
If you were to drop a player to bring in Josh P Kennedy out of Steel Sidebottom and Patrick Dangerfield, which would it be?
Sidebottom. I have danger and think/hope he will turn it around shortly. Has come up against three good taggers in Hocking, Raines and Cornes(also spent a chunk of time on the pine after his injury yesterday, hurting his score). Will obviously continue to cop the tag but his first 3 weeks were pretty tough and i expect/ need him to respond
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Out: Chapman; Sidebottom

In: Monfries; Josh P Kennedy

Still worried about the Chapman/Monfries swap - Chappy is just as likely to come out and tear Sydney a new one this week.
 
After trading K.Mitchell to Crouch i now have $569,800 to spend on a FWD to replace Zorko, question is who to bring in????
1) Westhoff and pocket $69,600
2) Monfries and pocket $159,100
3) Bartel and pocket $25,300

Whhat option would you go and why?

Cheers everyone!
 
After trading K.Mitchell to Crouch i now have $569,800 to spend on a FWD to replace Zorko, question is who to bring in????
1) Westhoff and pocket $69,600
2) Monfries and pocket $159,100
3) Bartel and pocket $25,300
Don't know what you are looking at, but it will cost you money to swap Zorko for Westhoff or Bartel. I'd take Bartel. More consistent and a proven performer. I bought him in last week for Watts.
 
Bartel seems like the trusty option, but the two port players have good break evens and might earn you a bit of cash for a few weeks.

But they're more likely to score low than Bartel is.
 
Don't know what you are looking at, but it will cost you money to swap Zorko for Westhoff or Bartel. I'd take Bartel.

If he has 569.8k to spend and Westhoff is 500k... that's a 69k remainder.
 
Three trade options:
Blicvas -> Leuenberger to become R2 (think his trade is a lock)
Zorko -> Westhoff
Dangerfield -> Hodge

Leaning towards Westhoff, only because he'll go up another 60-70k next week whereas Hodge only 25-35k.
Which would you make? And why?
 
Traded H. Shaw out for Hanley, cheaper and will get more points; although I might get someone other than Hanley

I'm considering selling Dangerfield but if I do he will probably have a great game like Martin did when I traded him out.
 
Three trade options:
Blicvas -> Leuenberger to become R2 (think his trade is a lock)
Zorko -> Westhoff
Dangerfield -> Hodge

Leaning towards Westhoff, only because he'll go up another 60-70k next week whereas Hodge only 25-35k.
Which would you make? And why?
I'd go Westhoff. Keep Danger. Will turn it around, Hodge wont be top 8-10 mids end of season
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Traded H. Shaw out for Hanley, cheaper and will get more points; although I might get someone other than Hanley

I'm considering selling Dangerfield but if I do he will probably have a great game like Martin did when I traded him out.
Heath Shaw averages 100 every year, always struggles against the hawks but will come back out as usual and dominate. I think t is a waste of a trade.

Sidebottom. I have danger and think/hope he will turn it around shortly. Has come up against three good taggers in Hocking, Raines and Cornes(also spent a chunk of time on the pine after his injury yesterday, hurting his score). Will obviously continue to cop the tag but his first 3 weeks were pretty tough and i expect/ need him to respond

Pity he will come up against Lower/Picken this week who aint to shabby themselves
 
Traded H. Shaw out for Hanley, cheaper and will get more points; although I might get someone other than Hanley

I'm considering selling Dangerfield but if I do he will probably have a great game like Martin did when I traded him out.
i've got Shaw and Dangerfield and am holding onto both
 
Heath Shaw averages 100 every year, always struggles against the hawks but will come back out as usual and dominate. I think t is a waste of a trade.



Pity he will come up against Lower/Picken this week who aint to shabby themselves
Yes your exactly right, Picken and Lower are handy at there craft. Although Cotchin did run rings around Lower yesterday! He copped the tag at times last year and was able to still score well in those games, im just hoping he lifts from here on no matter who sits on him as i wont be sideways trading him to anyone.
 
Yes your exactly right, Picken and Lower are handy at there craft. Although Cotchin did run rings around Lower yesterday! He copped the tag at times last year and was able to still score well in those games, im just hoping he lifts from here on no matter who sits on him as i wont be sideways trading him to anyone.

Cotchin got alot of his possessions especially early running around the back of free kicks an marks Ablett stlye, it isn't Danerfields go. Cotchin had 16 possesions at halftime yesterday only four of them were contested.
 
Heath Shaw averages 100 every year, always struggles against the hawks but will come back out as usual and dominate. I think t is a waste of a trade.
You're probably right about it being a waste of a trade. IMO Shaw was a waste of a selection. He was never going to improve that average. Hanley, Heppell, Gibbs, Duffield, Hartlett were all backs on the improve. Each of those will average a score off 100+, or close to, for the year and make you some cash along the way as well. If you've got Shaw already, I'd stick with him, although if you've been saving trades and have a few up your sleeve, a sideways to Hanley a pretty good move.
 
How long do people think Callum Sinclair will stick around for? I assume he will stick around until Nic Nat is back which from the sounds of it won't be till atleast Round 10. Or should I be worried about Lycett pushing him out? Thinking of downgrading Varcoe to Sinclair then moving Rowe to the forward line.
 
How long do people think Callum Sinclair will stick around for? I assume he will stick around until Nic Nat is back which from the sounds of it won't be till atleast Round 10. Or should I be worried about Lycett pushing him out? Thinking of downgrading Varcoe to Sinclair then moving Rowe to the forward line.
I think Sinclair can hold his spot until NicNat returns. Its his spot to lose for mine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top