- Banned
- #5,226
Yeah that's just the depositand KPF have the Highest Price. So You think each of those one's outside of Stewart and Jaksch you get a Top 10-15 Pick for them
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Yeah that's just the depositand KPF have the Highest Price. So You think each of those one's outside of Stewart and Jaksch you get a Top 10-15 Pick for them
Was difficult landing Adams only Shaw got it over the line
This would be one of the biggest trades of the last decade almost impossible to pull off
GWS wwon't lay down and happen which they shouldn't and will demand massive compensation
We could not get near a GWS offer for Cameron. Minimum would be 5 years at $1.5m by then. And trade wise the Sidebottom deal suggested would have to be on top of pick 1.
Forget it! GWS have to much salary cap advantage and the AFL are too motivated for Cameron to stay there for on and off field reasons.
We could not get near a GWS offer for Cameron. Minimum would be 5 years at $1.5m by then. And trade wise the Sidebottom deal suggested would have to be on top of pick 1.
Forget it! GWS have to much salary cap advantage and the AFL are too motivated for Cameron to stay there for on and off field reasons.
Better of waiting for him to become a free agent
Though it is highly unlikely that we would be able to pick up Cameron, GWS certainly look like they are preparing to lose a key forward. Why else would they pick up Boyd and McCarthy in the same draft? Surely they can't have Cameron, Patton, Boyd and McCarthy all in the same side. The only reason I can see is that they are preparing for players leaving or trying to get currency for future trades.
We can ask about Cameron but there is no way we will land him. Better off going for one of the other 3 or 4 good key forwards they have because they wont all be able to get a game
Would have to be unrestricted because BWS will be able to match any offer by any club.Better of waiting for him to become a free agent
They have brilliant depth to cover Cameron already, ...
... however they would ask tonnes from us.
Would have to be unrestricted because BWS will be able to match any offer by any club.
Though it is highly unlikely that we would be able to pick up Cameron, GWS certainly look like they are preparing to lose a key forward. Why else would they pick up Boyd and McCarthy in the same draft? Surely they can't have Cameron, Patton, Boyd and McCarthy all in the same side. The only reason I can see is that they are preparing for players leaving or trying to get currency for future trades.
Ha very good , BWS , they nearly have the colours ! The AFL's two franchises , BWS and the McSuns!Would have to be unrestricted because BWS will be able to match any offer by any club.