Rules S33 Rules & Tribunal Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

The admin just waived a rule for a rule breach and used it as a reminder given it's Round 1, no reason he can't do the same for the Bombers.

Not that, "it's Round 1" should come into it, the rule can only be breached by Rd 1.

I'm with you Clarkey. We can't pick and choose when we remind captains of sub-rules. They're written there. Naming players that have signalled no intent to join the league publicly (whether by sign up or by posting in a team/match thread) is a medium breach just like forgetting to put player outs is a high breach. Everybody has put out a team list, not everybody has done it to the full legality.
 
VERDICT IS IN

6 committee members voted to uphold the charge,5 supported a penalty downgrade.

It has also been recommended the rule be relaxed in future seasons.

The Bombers high impact charge will remain and they will start the season on -2 points.

parks-and-rec-jay-jackson.gif
 

Log in to remove this ad.

VERDICT IS IN

6 committee members voted to uphold the charge,5 supported a penalty downgrade.

It has also been recommended the rule be relaxed in future seasons.

The Bombers high impact charge will remain and they will start the season on -2 points.

parks-and-rec-jay-jackson.gif
Ridiculous.
 
… or reduce it to a penalty that fits the crime

This could be a legacy moment for ND

Crime?

This is SFA rules mate, let's no over react here.

No one is calling Brenton Davy out of retirement to arrest anyone for stuffing up a team submission.
 
VERDICT IS IN

6 committee members voted to uphold the charge,5 supported a penalty downgrade.

It has also been recommended the rule be relaxed in future seasons.

The Bombers high impact charge will remain and they will start the season on -2 points.

parks-and-rec-jay-jackson.gif
Idiots. Completely corrupt wankfest like usual.
 
What an absolutely ripper start to the season.

Committee doing a bloody great job imo.
There should be more ridiculously specific and seemingly arbitrary rules.

It's honestly the core of this league.
 
VERDICT IS IN

6 committee members voted to uphold the charge,5 supported a penalty downgrade.

It has also been recommended the rule be relaxed in future seasons.

The Bombers high impact charge will remain and they will start the season on -2 points.

parks-and-rec-jay-jackson.gif

**** you are a limp dick ADMIN, the sooner you are gone the better for all concerned you ****ing peanut.

Have a backbone you utter squib, you make AceAndy look like a knight of the round table.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

VERDICT IS IN

6 committee members voted to uphold the charge,5 supported a penalty downgrade.

It has also been recommended the rule be relaxed in future seasons.

The Bombers high impact charge will remain and they will start the season on -2 points.

parks-and-rec-jay-jackson.gif
****ing disgrace but thanks to 5 clubs for not being sheep.
 
You are getting very upset for someone who doesn't take this league very seriously :whistle:

I am not upset. You think when someone states an opnion, that automatically means they are upset??

**** you ARE a dumb campaigner.
 
There should be more ridiculously specific and seemingly arbitrary rules.
And don’t forget the penalties! Plenty of penalties, notices, infractions and punishments, the more unnecessary the better! Whooo!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Rules S33 Rules & Tribunal Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top