Rules S33 Rules & Tribunal Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Log in to remove this ad.

ClarkeM said:
Your first word is fair, the rest, well you know my stance already.

Just wondering where your posts have been about the many clubs that broke the rule and all got let off with no captains being suspended for failing to read the rules that have been there for many years. ;)
Click to expand...
I think there are two clear differences between the two breaches.

One - not listing the off-season retirements/delistings in the squad submission - is something that is analysed closely every season and has a clear inconvenience on keeping track of the history of the league. Every club captain has been meticulous with it for many seasons, and this particular case was out of apparent laziness. A well known rule that has a clear impact on the league.

The other has been forgotten over the passage of time to the point where many clubs have been unwittingly doing it for several seasons now unpunished. To suddenly ping every perpetrator this season out of the blue would be in my mind very impulsive. It would be the equivalent of if the WA police started fining every person to have more than 50 kg of potatoes in their possession (this is indeed a real law with a fine of $2000) without a notice to the public along the lines of "Police now targeting potato hoarders" before they started cracking down. An archaic/forgotten rule that needs to be highlighted prior to active enforcement.
 
NaturalDisaster said:
Verdict of RE-Vote

All committee members have voted to either dismiss or uphold the High Impact Charge on the Bombers. If upheld, the HI charge would remain, if dismissed, the charge would be downgraded to a Medium Impact.

The Bombers challenge has been successful with 6 committee members voting to dismiss the High Impact charge. Thus, their charge for incorrect Squad Submission will be downgraded to Medium Impact. Captains BLUEALLTHRU and Metalcrusher will still miss a week, but the Bombers will no longer receive a -2 point penalty.

gavel-case-dismissed.gif
Click to expand...
grow a spine you invertebrate
 
serial_thrilla said:
I think there are two clear differences between the two breaches.

One - not listing the off-season retirements/delistings in the squad submission - is something that is analysed closely every season and has a clear inconvenience on keeping track of the history of the league. Every club captain has been meticulous with it for many seasons, and this particular case was out of apparent laziness. A well known rule that has a clear impact on the league.

The other has been forgotten over the passage of time to the point where many clubs have been unwittingly doing it for several seasons now unpunished. To suddenly ping every perpetrator this season out of the blue would be in my mind very impulsive. It would be the equivalent of if the WA police started fining every person to have more than 50 kg of potatoes in their possession (this is indeed a real law with a fine of $2000) without a notice to the public along the lines of "Police now targeting potato hoarders" before they started cracking down. An archaic/forgotten rule that needs to be highlighted prior to active enforcement.
Click to expand...

So we can just forget about rules eh?? Seems legit ... you are a deadset rocket scientist aren't you ...
 
Metalcrusher said:
So we can just forget about rules eh?? Seems legit ... you are a deadset rocket scientist aren't you ...
Click to expand...
No - we should not forget about the rules. But we shouldn't start penalising people for breaching rules that have not been enforced for several seasons without a warning that they'll be enforced again.
 
serial_thrilla said:
No - we should not forget about the rules. But we shouldn't start penalising people for breaching rules that have not been enforced for several seasons without a warning that they'll be enforced again.
Click to expand...

Oh like the Bombers one ... righto .. gotcha.

Go on dig that one up where the rule used against was "last" used ;)
 
serial_thrilla said:
Find me an example of any other captain forgetting to list their squad OUTs in recent memory.
Click to expand...

That wasn't your initial point mate ... but sure deflect away ;)
 
The Ophidian Old Boys wish to advise that our legal counsel has a solution to this scenario.

All captains who have failed to comply with this requirement must spin the...


1643948244436.png
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

serial_thrilla said:
Can't find anyone who didn't list their OUTs, hey? Well that's why no-one has been pinged for it recently until your little forgetful moment.
Click to expand...

So your argument on one hand is saying that one rule is ..

"The other has been forgotten over the passage of time to the point where many clubs have been unwittingly doing it for several seasons now unpunished."

So thats ok ...

Then yet you voted to UPHOLD on another rule .. wait let be get what you said ...

"Can't find anyone who didn't list their OUTs, hey? Well that's why no-one has been pinged for it recently."


Hmmm ...
 
Metalcrusher said:
So your argument on one hand is saying that one rule is ..

"The other has been forgotten over the passage of time to the point where many clubs have been unwittingly doing it for several seasons now unpunished."

So thats ok ...

Then yet you voted to UPHOLD on another rule .. wait let be get what you said ...

"Can't find anyone who didn't list their OUTs, hey? Well that's why no-one has been pinged for it recently."


Hmmm ...
Click to expand...
Every other club captain is aware of the squad changes rule and has meticulously been doing it correctly for several seasons now. It is not an obscure or forgotten rule.
 
serial_thrilla said:
Every other club captain is aware of the squad changes rule and has meticulously been doing it correctly for several seasons now. It is not an obscure or forgotten rule.
Click to expand...

But not some rules even though they are posted on the same one page .. your argument holds weight ... lol

So meticulous on some rules .. but not others ... written on the same page ..

GOT IT!
 
Metalcrusher said:
You would endorse Russia invading Ukraine you ******* sell out ..
Click to expand...
Sell out? I've always supported more punishments and harsher punishments.

The randomisation of penalties in a league based on a random sim is genius.

(In before bombers victim complex melt about the Sim).
 
CrimsonViolet said:
Sell out? I've always supported more punishments and harsher punishments.

The randomisation of penalties in a league based on a random sim is genius.

(In before bombers victim complex melt about the Sim).
Click to expand...

Oh no you didn't!!! You mentioned it .....

Now you have dog gawn done scrood da pooch!
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Rules S33 Rules & Tribunal Thread

Similar threads

The Filth Wizard
  • Sticky
Resource Season 38 Rules and Tribunal Thread
13 14 15 16 17
Replies
422
Views
15K
Falconista
Falconista
Elton Johns Wig
Admin Notice S37 Rules & Tribunal Thread
25 26 27 28 29
Replies
705
Views
26K
Gralin
Gralin
Kennedy Parker
Admin Notice S35 Rules & Tribunal Thread
30 31 32 33 34
Replies
825
Views
21K
Callums_Guns
Callums_Guns
Jabba73
Discussion Rule breaches
10 11 12 13 14
Replies
337
Views
6K
DemurePrincess
DemurePrincess
Kennedy Parker
Admin Notice S36 Rules and serial_thrilla Thread
74 75 76 77 78
Replies
2K
Views
47K
Kilroy
Kilroy
cats2rise
  • Sticky
Rules The Sweet C.A - Rules
Replies
0
Views
158
cats2rise
cats2rise
damicky
Media My Cotchin Rules SELECTED for Round 1
2
Replies
26
Views
933
The Filth Wizard
The Filth Wizard

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top