Rules S33 Rules & Tribunal Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Now on to the BTGID charge against the Warriors for failing to vote
I firmly believe NaturalDisaster drummed up these bullshit charges against the bears and I to take attention off the Warriors failure

It’s a classic political hitjob
 
Update:

Bears have appealed and since its a bit late to do a captain vote and it was a harsh decision anyway, I have decided to not activate the suspended sentence.

Therefore Muddiemoose is free to play this week.

Suspended sentence still stands.
Why is it a bit late? Suspend him (or not) for next week's game after the process is carried out.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Since he was never given a suspended sentence in the first place its unfair to suspend him.
Typical jellyfish ND with no spine to follow up on his punishment
 
Since he was never given a suspended sentence in the first place its unfair to suspend him.

Coolio .. we can go back to heaping shit on the useless as **** Wazza's ..
 
Since he was never given a suspended sentence in the first place its unfair to suspend him.
See that's a better explanation than what you wrote previously.

That said if I were a nefarious captain-type, I'd be looking to see how many low level infractions I could carry out before someone cited me. The administration still owes me from when Ant Bear handed out a suspended sentence to me for not actually breaking any rule.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Update:

Bears have appealed and since its a bit late to do a captain vote and it was a harsh decision anyway, I have decided to not activate the suspended sentence.

Therefore Muddiemoose is free to play this week.

Suspended sentence still stands.
The people have spoken, you ****ed up, now you have fixed up.

Would save yourself time if you just got it right the first time.
 
Why is it a bit late? Suspend him (or not) for next week's game after the process is carried out.
Apparently your opinion is not worth listening to, because it might be right.

Couldn't be having that ...
 
Since he was never given a suspended sentence in the first place its unfair to suspend him.
He should have been given that sentence, except for your ineptness. He should have been suspended for a second offense, except for your ineptness. Once you missed both deadlines, the sentence should never have been imposed, except for your ineptness.

Sensing a theme here ...
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Rules S33 Rules & Tribunal Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top