Admin Notice S36 Rules and serial_thrilla Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

They didn't, they posted the next day. That's why we got a warning.....




But then when did you actually sign the player in question? My understanding is:

1. Initial squad submission was incorrect by virtue of listing a player incorrectly. You were warned accordingly.
2. That player wasn't officially signed subsequently via the appropriate channels, but was named to play in the team sheet regardless.

Those are different offences in my view, assuming the player hadn't actually been signed officially after the first warning.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Ah yes, the typical OOB approach to the rules: the "vibe".

Luckily for you the lettuce admin doesn't care for rules either! 🥬
Were we given an official warning for TJohn?

Yes, or No?

One word answer.
 
A little birdie told me that Kennedy Parker has appointed Phil Egan to undertake a formal investigation into the culture at the OOBs
under the tyrant couple Tigerturbulance and Mrs Turbo. Report to be handed down next week I understand. More to come .....

why-would-the-presidents-lawyers-hold-a-press-conference-at-a-landscaping-company-msnbc.gif

Gave me such a huge guffaw I woke someone from a coma.
 
Were we given an official warning for TJohn?

Yes, or No?

One word answer.
Don't try and oversimplify something to suit your incompetence.
You were given a warning for listing an ineligible player. That doesn't automatically then make them eligible.
 
Don't try and oversimplify something to suit your incompetence.
You were given a warning for listing an ineligible player. That doesn't automatically then make them eligible.
Yes it does.

No need to keep going at an innocent rookie.

Shame on you
 
Yes it does.

No need to keep going at an innocent rookie.

Shame on you
We all know this isn't the fault of the rookie (who looks like a great poster), U2.

Ophidians should have been charged thrice for the three separate infractions.

EDIT:

1. Incorrect squad submission - fumbler.
2. Incorrect squad submission - TJohn.
3. Naming an ineligible player in team submission - TJohn.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Yes it does.

No need to keep going at an innocent rookie.

Shame on you
No one is attacking the rookie mate. Just the OOBs complete disregard for the rules.
 
Hmmn. The Drags have an appalling LG and the poor Royals are now wearing hair shirts as their uniform , courtesy of the Cadsky error..

No accident these two Turkey Clubs are those seeking to hound the innocent OOBs and the Phoenicians.
 
No one is attacking the rookie mate. Just the OOBs complete disregard for the rules.
And our precious admins zero ****s to give policy. Which is listed right alongside the, I make the rules and choose when to apply them policy.
 
Hmmn. The Drags have an appalling LG and the poor Royals are now wearing hair shirts as their uniform , courtesy of the Cadsky error..

No accident these two Turkey Clubs are those seeking to hound the innocent OOBs and the Phoenicians.
You leave Brenton Davy out of this you scoundrel
 
Hmmn. The Drags have an appalling LG and the poor Royals are now wearing hair shirts as their uniform , courtesy of the Cadsky error..

No accident these two Turkey Clubs are those seeking to hound the innocent OOBs and the Phoenicians.
:$
 
We all know this isn't the fault of the rookie (who looks like a great poster), U2.

Ophidians should have been charged thrice for the three separate infractions.

EDIT:

1. Incorrect squad submission - fumbler.
2. Incorrect squad submission - TJohn.
3. Naming an ineligible player in team submission - TJohn.
Thrice!
 
And our precious admins zero *s to give policy. Which is listed right alongside the, I make the rules and choose when to apply them policy.

Hello Cadsky error,

The Quoted words can almost be understood. Congratulations.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Admin Notice S36 Rules and serial_thrilla Thread

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top