There's the rub - is he with us? Has the trade been done? I haven't seen any formal announcement of the deal.
Trade deals to date don't even mention it: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-trade-week-done-deals/story-e6frf9jf-1225783041967
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Schulz off to Port for Mitch Farmer?
- Thread starter Madtiger2006
- Start date
- Tagged users None
There's the rub - is he with us? Has the trade been done? I haven't seen any formal announcement of the deal.
Trade deals to date don't even mention it: http://www.heraldsun.com.au/sport/afl/afl-trade-week-done-deals/story-e6frf9jf-1225783041967
AFL Draft Camp 2007
Vertical Jump
1. David Gourdis 81cm
2. Lachlan Hill 74cm
3. Patrick Dangerfield 73cm
4. James Mulligan 72cm
5. Levi Greenwood 71cm
6. Matthew Lobbe 70cm
Steven Gaertner 70cm
Simon Starling 70cm
9. Robbie Tarrant 68cm
James Polkinghorne 68cm
Mitchell Farmer 68cm
Nice leap on the young fella
Vertical Jump
1. David Gourdis 81cm
2. Lachlan Hill 74cm
3. Patrick Dangerfield 73cm
4. James Mulligan 72cm
5. Levi Greenwood 71cm
6. Matthew Lobbe 70cm
Steven Gaertner 70cm
Simon Starling 70cm
9. Robbie Tarrant 68cm
James Polkinghorne 68cm
Mitchell Farmer 68cm
Nice leap on the young fella
PHX
Quarterback Style
It'll get done. I know people are keen to get get Schulz out but Port have the Burgoyne thing to focus on. So all we can do is have patience for when they fill in the papers. WE have a good relationship with Port, so I can't see anything stopping the informal agreement that has been established.
- Banned
- #179
Talk to me The Cotch......
- Banned
- #182
Maybe the second round pick they get from Hawks via dons is involved?
Schulz and pick 35 for Farmer and pick 26 (sourced from trade of Williams to Dons and then sent on for Burgoyne)?
Just a thought. I know - Calm down, Tiger...
Any pick upgrades we can get are most welcome. That one sounds fair.
- Banned
- #185
more likely schulz and 51 for farmer and 40.
JohnHowat31
Rookie
- Jul 16, 2006
- 22
- 0
- AFL Club
- Richmond
Just wondering if anyone could shed some light on why the Tigers would sign Jay Schulz to a two year contract at the end of the 2008 season?? I believe they did everything they could to try and trade him last year, and obviously Port seemed very very keen and it didn't quite get done. Why then, for a player they clearly didn't want to keep, would they possibly sign him on for another two years?? One maybe, for back up purposes....beyond me!!
I hope it is picks being the hold up whilst I know no one else will probably want Schulz but we could be looking elsewhere for something for him rather than waiting.
My guess is we signed him in the hope that we could finally get a deal for him done with Port.
- Banned
- #190
Because in a team that has mid field talent with footy smarts, a player like the Sarge can compliment it. One thing the Sarge has that alot at tigerland didnt is footy smarts and for a big man his closing speed is real good and when he was lurking as a loose man in our defence, his vision when he had the ball was good. Thats what Port sees, we also see it doesnt happen consistently...and they think they can solve that problem...the end.
guys please dont devalue our players by posting crap about them !!
think of other teams & what they are going through .
if richmond offered carlton shulz & tuck plus pick 69 or what ever
carlton today would take that up in a minute. & probably pay half his wage aswell.
think of other teams & what they are going through .
if richmond offered carlton shulz & tuck plus pick 69 or what ever
carlton today would take that up in a minute. & probably pay half his wage aswell.
Whenever you are... I've got plenty of time on my hands.
courtjester
Cancelled
Watch Shultz hold down CHB or FF successfully for the Power next year.
Barnzy
Premium Platinum
My eyes are glued in anticipation....
That's the truth. If we manage to get rid of Shulz in this trade period, then it has been a massive success for the RFC.
Similar threads
