Scott & Michael to be charged.

Remove this Banner Ad

tapestry said:
So are ch9 going to be charged for bringing the game into disrepute by continually showing the incident, talking it up and continually showing NR crying on the boundary line??? That was a freaking joke. The guy is injured, he's upset, he shed a few tears. So what? He's a kid, I can't make the call on whether or not he should be captain, but to continually focus on his misery was uncalled for, along with the jibes about the hospital. Ch9 and Ed are just as much to blame for this furore as anyone else.

Exactly.

If the AFL has already decided to charge Scott and Michael it jus tproves that the whole AFL review committee process is flawed, as they have already decided to charge prior to the review process starting. How does that work.


Good to see the AFL remaining unbiased.

If indeed they do get charged, it won't be pretty for the AFL here in QLD.
 
toasty said:
What they did was outside the simple rules of human decency......


Like you can talk. Some of us did see that thread you started about Millane before it disappeared. Take your holier than thou crap and sprout it to yourself in the mirror, it's got no value to anyone else. Maybe the mods should have left it up and no one would be listening to your double standard tripe now.
 
toasty said:
it is an unwriiten rule to leave an injured player alone
.


Right......... :confused:

Lloyd having his broken hand hit all during a game by a Bulldogs player

Nigel Lappin having his broken ribs hit and bumped all through 2003 Grand Final

Jonathan Brown having his broken knee hit all through Grand Final 2004 by Cornes.

You know why nothing came of the above incidents, because the above players chose to come on the ground and play with those injuries, and the same goes for Reiwoldt, he chose to waive off the trainer and go back to his position.

They are footballers, and footballers bump their opposition.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

coasting said:
If he was injured then WHAT WAS HE STILL DOING ON THE FIELD? Pathetic.
So if your injured theres like a sixty second grace to get off then whack your anyones meat??

I remember your mob bleating a few years back when Libba scragged Cousins out of the game, thats not against any rules either was it, just a simple tag.

Also a lot of bleating re Baker holding Judd, no supporting your team is one thing good on ya, but justifying the actions of these cowards is reprehensible even the stupidest red head in the world Karl Langdon thinks it was wrong. This isn't an issue of team vs team it is two thugs crossing the line of decent, sportsmanship and endeavour
 
BrisGirl said:
Right......... :confused:

Lloyd having his broken hand hit all during a game by a Bulldogs player

Nigel Lappin having his broken ribs hit and bumped all through 2003 Grand Final

Jonathan Brown having his broken knee hit all through Grand Final 2004 by Cornes.

You know why nothing came of the above incidents, because the above players chose to come on the ground and play with those injuries, and the same goes for Reiwoldt, he chose to waive off the trainer and go back to his position.

They are footballers, and footballers bump their opposition.
They are completely different circumstances. Those players made the decisiont to play and should expect that. Nick was seriously injured minutes before and was bumped before he even had time to collect himself and get off the ground. He was in obvious trouble and he was targeted while he was down. Really courageous and manly from Scott and Michael.
 
tapestry said:
Like you can talk. Some of us did see that thread you started about Millane before it disappeared. Take your holier than thou crap and sprout it to yourself in the mirror, it's got no value to anyone else. Maybe the mods should have left it up and no one would be listening to your double standard tripe now.

Mate simply stating a fact a stupid collingwood fan, likes to have a dig at someone elses misery. Its easy to do
 
toasty said:
So if your injured theres like a sixty second grace to get off then whack your anyones meat??

I remember your mob bleating a few years back when Libba scragged Cousins out of the game, thats not against any rules either was it, just a simple tag.

Also a lot of bleating re Baker holding Judd, no supporting your team is one thing good on ya, but justifying the actions of these cowards is reprehensible even the stupidest red head in the world Karl Langdon thinks it was wrong. This isn't an issue of team vs team it is two thugs crossing the line of decent, sportsmanship and endeavour
100% correct.
 
magpies_1990 said:
They are completely different circumstances. Those players made the decisiont to play and should expect that. Nick was seriously injured minutes before and was bumped before he even had time to collect himself and get off the ground. He was in obvious trouble and he was targeted while he was down. Really courageous and manly from Scott and Michael.
So you're saying Nick walking back into a position wasn't an indication he had made the decision to rejoin play?
 
flamethrower said:
The first bump by Mal Michael occurred exactly 8 seconds after Riewoldt broke his clavicle.


Incorrect he was down on the ground near the boundary line for longer than thatm he then ran to the top of the circle and the trainer came out to him, moved his rm around, waved the trainer away, walked back towards the top of the square, then the bump.

8 seconds my eye.
 
flamethrower said:
The first bump by Mal Michael occurred exactly 8 seconds after Riewoldt broke his clavicle.
And in that 8 seconds he....

* held his shoulder on the ground
* stood up
* had a trainer come over and talk to him
* indicate to the trainer he wanted to play on
* walk back into position

....I think you need a new watch
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

toasty said:
Mate simply stating a fact a stupid collingwood fan, likes to have a dig at someone elses misery. Its easy to do

So making fun in poor taste of the death of someone to purposely aggrevate others is within the bounds of human deceny to you? You can bleat all you like but you've got no credibility after your comment yesterday.
 
campbell said:
Incorrect he was down on the ground near the boundary line for longer than thatm he then ran to the top of the circle and the trainer came out to him, moved his rm around, waved the trainer away, walked back towards the top of the square, then the bump.

8 seconds my eye.
Rubbish ne never crossed back into the fifty, he turned from the trainer buckled over holding his arm and bang first dog arrived
 
toasty said:
So if your injured theres like a sixty second grace to get off then whack your anyones meat??

It was clear to Joe Blow that he did his shoulder when he hit the ground. Reiwoldt was clearly trying to be a big man by trying to play on with a broken collar bone. Someone with some common sense should taken him off the ground but common sense seems to be lacking down at the Saints.

toasty said:
I remember your mob bleating a few years back when Libba scragged Cousins out of the game, thats not against any rules either was it, just a simple tag.

Also a lot of bleating re Baker holding Judd, no supporting your team is one thing good on ya, but justifying the actions of these cowards is reprehensible even the stupidest red head in the world Karl Langdon thinks it was wrong. This isn't an issue of team vs team it is two thugs crossing the line of decent, sportsmanship and endeavour

Congratulations, you just raised two very good precidents against your argument that were not cited by the AFL and were cleared as legal.
 
Tezmyster said:
They're going to announce it on a public holiday, yeah right :rolleyes:


FFS, I'm not going to justify myself any more. They have to wait until all the matches have been completed.

Here is another thread I started before all the so called journos got hold of it if you want to question my credentials.

http://www.bigfooty.com/forum/showthread.php?t=114960
 
tapestry said:
So making fun in poor taste of the death of someone to purposely aggrevate others is within the bounds of human deceny to you? You can bleat all you like but you've got no credibility after your comment yesterday.

Mate your here defending the point that there is no line of human decency then attacking me for breaking it??? whats the frequency kenneth???

I dont see any reason for a collingwood supporter to be throwing his funny little vid into the debate just wanted to remind him that theres raw nerves in every footy club and for the record millanes death is not a funny subject
 
Daytripper said:
FFS, I'm not going to justify myself any more. They have to wait until all the matches have been completed.

No they don't. The AFL make announcements week in and out saying "player x has been charged with yyyy, the review of the match is still continuing and further charges may arise later today" about a game that was on a Friday night, and has been reviewed before the game that was played on Sunday arvo.
 
toasty said:
Mate your here defending the point that there is no line of human decency then attacking me for breaking it??? whats the frequency kenneth???

I dont see any reason for a collingwood supporter to be throwing his funny little vid into the debate just wanted to remind him that theres raw nerves in every footy club and for the record millanes death is not a funny subject

I'm not saying is there no line, I'm saying you've got no right or credibility to go around attacking the actions of the Lions players when you made such an uncalled for and bad taste cheap shot yourself.
 
tapestry said:
I'm not saying is there no line, I'm saying you've got no right or credibility to go around attacking the actions of the Lions players when you made such an uncalled for and bad taste cheap shot yourself.

I'm saying theres no line of decency, so what I did was right, on your justification so is kiddy pr0n, so is bashing pensioners for money, so is racism,
so is Micheal Jackson sleeping with boys, so is murdering youe wife if you can't get a divorce, so is killing your dog if you can't afford to feed it. See basically what your saying is if the means justifies the end it's ok. Even though you know what your doing is wrong, as long as you can excuse it for some percieved higher good to yourself or someone close then its open slather. I actually was taught if you think its wrong, then it most probably is.

Both players have said if they had known it was broken then it would have been wrong to attack him, now they know its broken obviously there should be at the least an apology because they knew that would be wrong!!!! If they knew it was broken they wouldn't have touched him both said that but attacked anyway, I think that they should be delisted
 
tapestry said:
That's not what I'm saying. You're making assumptions and making an ass of yourself. Don't put words into my mouth.


the means fits the end buddy and you stuffed up your little sentence its making an ass out of you and me. But once again changed fact to suit yourself
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Scott & Michael to be charged.

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top