Scott Morrison - How Long? Part 5 - The stroll out.

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
We're looking at this prick getting voted out, but this purchase will help his election chances.

Furthermore if that scrawny fu** from the chinese consulate in Canberra grandstands again! Which he better bloody not. Will play into slippery slimy slomo's hands for 2022. If that idiot does, I'll drive the campaigner to the airport myself I think.
Is it really gonna sway any votes he didn't already have ??
 
Well he could be genuinely ignorant - which means a failure of personal diligence or awareness
More likely he does know or suspects whom - so is now beholden to a secret donor
Or anyone can claim to be the donor and he is open to manipulation both direct and indirect.
Could've been the Taliban for all we or he knows.


BUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUT ok because conservative.


And if i've learnt ANYTHING this past 8 years it's that " IT'S OKAY WHEN A CONSERVATIVE DOES IT "
 
We're looking at this prick getting voted out, but this purchase will help his election chances.

Why will it make any difference? We were already getting fleeced on subs. Now we are getting them from somewhere else. There is no positive to this announcement - no one cares except military boffins.

Labor could run a scare campaign on nuclear but I doubt they'd bother given the myriad of other Morrison failures they can choose from.

This issues lasts about 2 days until it is completely forgotten and we back talking about covid and lockdowns.

And when the election comes around we will be talking about pedophiles, rape and grand theft.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

We're looking at this prick getting voted out, but this purchase will help his election chances.

I don't think anyone really cares other than military weebs who wank off on weapons and guns, or the yellow peril racist crowd
 
Wonder how many times sky news has mentioned the sub deal vs the lehrmann trial........


Remember lehrmann, Shirko pretended he had no knowledge.

Good thing the trial is going ahead though - he wont be able to announce a fleet of subs at every mention/directions hearing. Imagine if this actually goes to a hearing...
 
Because giving Albo and Labor the keys to the country is like letting a 5 year old steer a car!



Just because I love Kayleigh for standing up for what she believes in doesn't mean I agreed with Trump for his entire presidency.
Not sure how much time she spent standing mate ;)


Yeah i said it
 
sorry, I am meaning is it not fair game for those outside of the party to comment that this move looks like a vote loser?

That's what elections are for

It's like Weightman said during save our skins. If you're not a member who contributes financially to the club, you're just a barracker.

Want to know how to kill the 50% union vote? Join up and make branch numbers so dominant that the union 50% becomes unjustifiable, and their financial contributions not needed.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

how you speak and how you write can be very different…
Well, as it happens, we have a letter from Keating in today's SMH.


I know Chris Uhlmann has a sideline writing fiction, but he seems to be getting his two jobs confused (“Keating’s advice on China unsound”, September 15).
He accuses me of saying China bears no fault for the trouble in our relationship – this is not what I said at all, as Herald readers would find if they checked my article in the Australian Financial Review of September 3 for themselves. The main purpose of my article to which Uhlmann takes exception, was not to set out areas where I disagree with Beijing but to make clear the dangers to Australia in Australia’s current approach.
Uhlmann follows Peter Dutton and the Prime Minister in the growing chorus of Australian hawks who hear the drums of war beating and compare the current situation in East Asia to Europe in the 1930s, with China being portrayed as the equivalent of the rampaging Nazis (Uhlmann’s reference: “Anschluss” in the South China Sea).
This imagery and the overblown language that goes with it – “Almost all Beijing’s grievances with Australia are commands that it compromise its security and its democracy” – is intended to serve only one objective; to normalise in the minds of Australians the idea that China is an existential threat to our country and our way of life and that military responses will be necessary because, unless China dismantles its entire system, there is no other way to deal with it.

There is no room in Uhlmann’s simplistic analysis for shading, debate or discussion – Beijing is a one dimensional villain and that’s it. Australia is the blameless hero.
It could serve as a plot for one of Uhlmann’s thrillers (“Beijing has revealed ... its plans for the way the world should be run”) but it is a dangerous fantasy as a prescription for Australian national security policy.
As I said in the AFR article, Australia is being led by the government and likes of Uhlmann into a strategic dead-end. And all in the cause of not having a foreign policy which is capable of dealing with China and the US simultaneously.
Paul Keating, Potts Point
 
Well, as it happens, we have a letter from Keating in today's SMH.


I know Chris Uhlmann has a sideline writing fiction, but he seems to be getting his two jobs confused (“Keating’s advice on China unsound”, September 15).
He accuses me of saying China bears no fault for the trouble in our relationship – this is not what I said at all, as Herald readers would find if they checked my article in the Australian Financial Review of September 3 for themselves. The main purpose of my article to which Uhlmann takes exception, was not to set out areas where I disagree with Beijing but to make clear the dangers to Australia in Australia’s current approach.
Uhlmann follows Peter Dutton and the Prime Minister in the growing chorus of Australian hawks who hear the drums of war beating and compare the current situation in East Asia to Europe in the 1930s, with China being portrayed as the equivalent of the rampaging Nazis (Uhlmann’s reference: “Anschluss” in the South China Sea).
This imagery and the overblown language that goes with it – “Almost all Beijing’s grievances with Australia are commands that it compromise its security and its democracy” – is intended to serve only one objective; to normalise in the minds of Australians the idea that China is an existential threat to our country and our way of life and that military responses will be necessary because, unless China dismantles its entire system, there is no other way to deal with it.

There is no room in Uhlmann’s simplistic analysis for shading, debate or discussion – Beijing is a one dimensional villain and that’s it. Australia is the blameless hero.
It could serve as a plot for one of Uhlmann’s thrillers (“Beijing has revealed ... its plans for the way the world should be run”) but it is a dangerous fantasy as a prescription for Australian national security policy.
As I said in the AFR article, Australia is being led by the government and likes of Uhlmann into a strategic dead-end. And all in the cause of not having a foreign policy which is capable of dealing with China and the US simultaneously.
Paul Keating, Potts Point

THE CREDIBLE HULK
 
Aah yes the scrapping of the French subs will cost us billions even before we stump up for the nuclear subs. Yep Libs are the best economic managers.

Like I said in another thread - I look forward to the outrage over $2.4 billion for a road never built subs never built
 
Like I said in another thread - I look forward to the outrage over $2.4 billion for a road never built subs never built
Imagine what the froggies think

Zeze aussiz - zer tell us to modify our nuclear subs to be diesel, zen when we do zey tell us our diesel subs are merde and to piss off and buy nuclear subs from le americains

Sacre bleu
 
Imagine what the froggies think

Zeze aussiz - zer tell us to modify our nuclear subs to be diesel, zen when we do zey tell us our diesel subs are merde and to piss off and buy nuclear subs from le americains

Sacre bleu

I doubt Australia's incompetence is a great surprise to them.
 
Mate..at the rate it takes to make a nuclear submarine the Chinese will have waged the war and smashed us.

How much is it costing us to get out of the French deal?

Imagine a broken down nuclear powered sub parked out in the pacific and having to wait for the Americans to come fix it! Here is Australia trying to be some superpower when the only 2 countries that know us only know us for our strategic location.
 
Mate..at the rate it takes to make a nuclear submarine the Chinese will have waged the war and smashed us.

How much is it costing us to get out of the French deal?

Imagine a broken down nuclear powered sub parked out in the pacific and having to wait for the Americans to come fix it! Here is Australia trying to be some superpower when the only 2 countries that know us only know us for our strategic location.
And one of those doesn't know the name of our PM.
 

“Instead we should buy 12 of a proven design which is already in the water. We want long-range hunter-killer vessels. We also want them to be able to stay submerged for long periods to avoid detection. Nuclear does this in spades.”


WTF are we going to do with nuclear subs? How does this dip-shit and Dutton stay in power this long? No wonder he's been provoking China for years. These guys are dangerous. Do you really think we'll have a sniff of survival if China decides to visit? And what a pissy waste of hundreds of billions of dollars. Imagine if he were competent and spent that money on the vaccine when it was needed, how many lives would've been saved and lockdowns avoided. Australia trying to promote a military presence or be a military power and provoking nations is like Tonga trying to launch a space program, you laugh at first but quickly realise they're just putting their own citizens in danger and won't blink bankrupting the country while doing it. Piss off with your warmongering antics. "China's worst nightmare", ha, Scomo is Australia's worst nightmare!! How long has this moron got left?? He's digging the country into a million holes and will hand over a big pile of shit to the next government. Hopefully all his crap can be undone in future at little cost. Scomo trying to play with the big boys, and they don't even know his name. And we'll hear these subs are creating "jobs, jobs, jobs", well Nazi Germany created plenty of jobs too, it doesn't mean that they're created in the right sector. Hawaii can keep him next time the country is burning. He's the most dangerous, anti-Australia, anti-environment, pro-military, pro-religion PM in my lifetime. Incompetent in all areas.


1631722744685.png
1631722856420.png
1631722986102.png
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top