I was using sarcasm to highlight the point that post counts are a poor metric to measure posting strength.
I did this by way of example, a very common way to illustrate a point.
Clearly the amount of posts someone makes has an extremely low relevance to who we think makes the biggest contribution to the board (the criteria for the Beez)
Yet in this thread we are using the amount of posts a team makes as the criteria of strength of a team.
We see the folly in using this when rating the individual, but seem blinded when assessing the team.
I hope this helps you to understand.
( In case you missed it, which seems probable, this post too has an element of me being facetious, but my point stands)