Snake_Baker
The one true King of the North
- Apr 24, 2013
- 81,024
- 153,194
- AFL Club
- North Melbourne
- Other Teams
- Essendon Lawn Bowls Club
- Banned
- #676
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Goldstein, Cunnington, Davies-Uniake, Anderson, Polec & Dumont.
That's 6 of the starting 7 midfield that were missing,
The Saints were good, but have a little perspective Plugger.
They are usually trying to get some run into likely round one players in the preseason games. I think we have a few to come in still who are on managed programs (Greash, Hanners etc). He might miss out and have to make it back through the VFL. At least they should have a platform to push for selection this year.
When did we play Mickey Mouse?Do you really think if he gets picked for rnd 1 that Ratts and Match committee are going to pick him on one quarter in a Mickey Mouse game.
Lots i would thinkView attachment 1065820
Hey George, how much would a grassroots campaign have to raise to keep the jumper sponsorless on the back?
I don't wish it on North, but can't see them not being bottom 3 this year with list and coaching situation.Possibly.
Yeah not sure you can pull the perspective card on that observation. Saints missing Marshall, Gresham, Jones, Hannebery from the middle and Geary, Paton from defence.Goldstein, Cunnington, Davies-Uniake, Anderson, Polec & Dumont.
That's 6 of the starting 7 midfield that were missing,
The Saints were good, but have a little perspective Plugger.
Yeah not sure you can pull the perspective card on that observation. Saints missing Marshall, Gresham, Jones, Hannebery from the middle and Geary, Paton from defence.
Mate don’t be a smart arse.Apologies. I'm surprised we didn't lose by 300 points. Fortunately St Kilda took it easy.
Mate don’t be a smart arse.
Of course it does especially when it’s in good spiritSarcasm has its place.
Carlisle tooYeah not sure you can pull the perspective card on that observation. Saints missing Marshall, Gresham, Jones, Hannebery from the middle and Geary, Paton from defence.
You are fortunate. Why couldn’t the 20 odd other blokes that actually did play not play like witches hats?Apologies. I'm surprised we didn't lose by 300 points. Fortunately St Kilda took it easy.
You are fortunate. Why couldn’t the 20 odd other blokes that actually did play not play like witches hats?
Marvellous
Snake is selective with whom he likes.Snake is a good poster, we were beating up on a young inexperienced side and while their outs wouldn't have been likely to get them a win, they would have been more competitive. They did beat us round one last year with their better players in. They are in rebuild mode while we are honing our side for a charge at finals. It's a bit like getting excited about how tough you are after stealing a prep kids pocket money. Having Goldy and Cunners would have at least been like having to take the kid's money with his dad watching.
North are bottom 4, possible wooden spooners but in the long run they are well ahead of the crows and the hawks atm.So, not bottom 4 then?
Yep I agree Snake is a good poster and never gives us trouble. that result was about right for where both teams are at the minuteSnake is a good poster, we were beating up on a young inexperienced side and while their outs wouldn't have been likely to get them a win, they would have been more competitive. They did beat us round one last year with their better players in. They are in rebuild mode while we are honing our side for a charge at finals. It's a bit like getting excited about how tough you are after stealing a prep kids pocket money. Having Goldy and Cunners would have at least been like having to take the kid's money with his dad watching.
He is ok, however the point of North using missing players laughable considering the players we were missing.Good poster or not I don’t know him, and If he wants to come on our board and be a smart arse then he should expect to cop a bit back.
Snake is a good poster, we were beating up on a young inexperienced side and while their outs wouldn't have been likely to get them a win, they would have been more competitive. They did beat us round one last year with their better players in. They are in rebuild mode while we are honing our side for a charge at finals. It's a bit like getting excited about how tough you are after stealing a prep kids pocket money. Having Goldy and Cunners would have at least been like having to take the kid's money with his dad watching.
He is ok, however the point of North using missing players laughable considering the players we were missing.
But practice game people, practice game.
Good hitout, no injuries to either team.
The problem with seeking balance in the discussion is that it tends to be misconstrued by the parochial in a defensive manner, which is not its intention.
AFL discussion boards involve a significant representation of inexperienced parochial contributors who are incapable of understanding the nuances of the sport, and who get ultra defensive the moment any significant factors are presented.
This practice match didn't reveal anything definitive to me. There was just too much data left out of the match.
How do I think the sides will go in 2021?
I reckon StKilda should be aiming for 5th/6th all going well, and they could go deep in to the finals. They are probably not top tier at the moment, but they are next tier.
North's best could be 8 wins and I reckon we will have had a bad season if we can't snag 5 wins, but we're far from the basket case that the misleading 2020 season would have some believe. I suspect we will emerge as the team we are going to become this year. At some point the kids will all click and the football myopics will be able to see.
Injuries, of course, will play a massive role in any outcomes.