You’re being sillyOnce we get the talent in, we can save money by not having a coach, right? Because it's just a talent issue, right?
For most of their history, the GWS have been the most talented team. Zero premierships.
On the other hand, Richmond won three flags with a long list of contributing GOPs. And admittedly some very, very good players.
Finally, with all the perversions of the draft built into the system, what happens if we cannot access the required talent? Does that mean we don't have to really try to win the premiership until we get lucky with talent?
The responsibility to succeed falls on those at the club right now.
It’s the sum of all parts
Always has and always will be
Pretty much any of the books written by some of the great coaches of any elite sport will tell you that.
You won’t hear that though in a media landscape regulated by the AFL and especially by Fox because the commercialisation of the game leverages off the highly successful format of populism, which is clearly a winner in the age of Trumpism, and within populism you need 2 sides and a villain...enter the coach as the Vilian, he sells big.
The sum of all parts is what gets the silver.
Now all of that is not some blind endorsement of Lyon, far from it, I think he’s a good coach but like all, he has his faults.
So what is left, access to talent. Again most coaches in elite sporting codes know what their sports critical mass for talent is required to challenge, for most successful AFL, they will tell you it’s a depth of talent that bats around the 25 mark.
We are well short of that and as I keep saying, access to talent for a poor club like ours is almost an impossible challenge.
Write to the Pres and implore him to increase the pressure on the AFL to change the academy rules.
Last edited: