Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
But it would have been horrible for the AFL, the bottom side beating one of their lovechilds. I wouldn't go as far as to say it was the reason we lost, we still could've and probably should've won the game - it wouldn't have been the 10 goal win that it was looking like, but still a win, but the umpiring at times was a bit bewildering, especially when they got the run on.Yet the same set of umpires interpreted LDU slipping on his backside and hand balling it away as holding the ball.
How the same set of umpires could all see that as holding the ball, yet let legitimate holding the ball scenarios go, is the real question that has to be asked.
It’s selective umpiring bias. Anyone that doesn’t think these guys umpire without bias, has their head in the sand.
The non 50 metre decision was living proof of it. It’s a close game and the Collingwood fans will go crazy if I pay that, so surprise surprise no call.
They even have time to make the call and stop play and award the 50 yet choose to let the game roll on.
It’s a tough way to lose a game of footy when the umpires interject themselves into the contest like they did after half time.
Yes a good side would probably be able to overcome it, but this is a young group, that is still learning how to win.
The scoreboard says Collingwood won the game, but let’s be honest there is a massive * on that result based on what transpired after half time.
Let’s hope the boys build off it and it doesn’t destroy their confidence, because in the eyes of the majority of footy fans they were ripped off from what would have been a great win for this group.
Did anyone confirm her appointment with John Setka??You can’t make up this shit LOL
In what world does he run inboard you gimp? He actually stops and motions to the umpire asking for the 50 metres.
So they have even stopped to making up shit to conceal what was a massive **** up?
Anyone think Laura is doing a good job? She’s one of the worst appointments we have seen in that role and there have been some shockers.
Let me guess she also said the review was inconclusive? LOL
It awesome to know that we now have a game where no decision is ever wrong, because some clown at AFL house will just make up some random shit to explain it away.It's awesome to know Collingwood players now have free rein to anticipate umpires decisions before they're made.
100%You can’t make up this shit LOL
In what world does he run inboard you gimp? He actually stops and motions to the umpire asking for the 50 metres.
So they have even stopped to making up shit to conceal what was a massive **** up?
Anyone think Laura is doing a good job? She’s one of the worst appointments we have seen in that role and there have been some shockers.
Let me guess she also said the review was inconclusive? LOL
no, no, the umpire was right, but he was wrongWow. Just wow. That "explanation" may be the greatest load of convoluted garbage
I have heard, from an organisation that specialises in them.
Just to be clear, it wasn't a mistake not to pay the 50 because of the mistake in not calling stand? Is that right?
So if an opposition player feels that the umpire SHOULD have called play on, they are allowed to run at the mark taker without penalty, because the umpire SHOULD have called play-on, even though he hasn’t called play on…..
100%So if an opposition player feels that the umpire SHOULD have called play on, they are allowed to run at the mark taker without penalty, because the umpire SHOULD have called play-on, even though he hasn’t called play on…..
Well Daicos practically did that most of the game with his constant squealing.Basically saying it is ok for the Pies players to umpire the game themselves, I suppose it cuts out the middle man
She should have just quoted the Castle……no, no, the umpire was right, but he was wrong
simples