MRP / Trib. Suban straight to Tribunal

[UFO Tatsu]

Nathan Schmook:
The jury considers 150 points to be the appropriate penalty.

that is not too bad, i would take that ... with his record (or rather lack of it), shouldnt be any real issues

 

[FreoGirl]

1 weeks is fine
Nathan Schmook:
So Suban will miss round one and carry 50 points on his record.

 

[electricfeel]

LOL at that WCE troll Embers/Coledinho who reckons Suban should get 12 weeks on the MRP board

 

[FreoGirl]

I have a real issue with the MRP board calling him a gouger..

 

[Darcy 2 Fyfe]

Round 1 derby again. Wheel out the kids.

 

[FFC4ME]

Thankfully, I doubt they will schedule the inaugural Adelaide Oval Showdown and a Western Derby in the same round, even if it's a split round.

For once though, a reasonable enough penalty.

 

[Seppo]

Round 1 derby again. Wheel out the kids.

Round 1 next year is against Melbourne, we will be fine

 

[electricfeel]

I hate having round 1 derbies...doesn't have the same kind of build up and hype. It's best when both teams have played at least a month of football to get a better gauge at where they're both at

 

[imperial_oz]

Fair penalty. I was fearing so much worse than that. One week is about what it deserved really

 

[BTFlukes]

Good result considering what Gerard Whateley and Mark Robinson were saying on AFL360 the other day.

 

[PapaJ]

Well I'll take that. They way the rules are laid out he could have got 4-6 (including double penalty) - I'm glad they were sensible about it. A reprimand would be fair, making a big deal because it's a GF puts it to over a 100 points.

Reckon they got it about right, and it's not often you say that about the tribunal.

 

[MadMac]

I don't know. I think he got off lightly, very lightly. Regardless what others got in the past as consistency by the MRP, or tribunal in this case, is non existent. Two wrongs [or several wrongs] don't make it right. There simply is no place in footy for conducts like that. I like Subes and I'm happy with the outcome in a way, but still think he was veeeery lucky.

 

[Outshined]

Great result. Thought we'd be looking at 2-3.

 

[yoong]

Mayne, Dawson and now Suban.
All rather fair ruling...
Can it be?...really?...no it can't really be true?!
MRP/tribunal is finally getting better at its job?

 

[Noodleman]

I'm still in disbelief as to how that wasn't 50m. It's not like it was off the ball and the maggot might of missed it, he would have been looking straight at it. Late and a raised elbow.......fair dinkum

when you throw your head back all the time and insinuate high contact when in fact you receive contact around the shoulders/chest, then umpires are bound to start doubting you

 

[Nothing]

when you throw your head back all the time and insinuate high contact when in fact you receive contact around the shoulders/chest, then umpires are bound to start doubting you

Thanks for your input. Now piss off.

 

[Seppo]

when you throw your head back all the time and insinuate high contact when in fact you receive contact around the shoulders/chest, then umpires are bound to start doubting you

Go back to your board you flog.

 

[Righteo]

when you throw your head back all the time and insinuate high contact when in fact you receive contact around the shoulders/chest, then umpires are bound to start doubting you

I know what you're saying but it doesn't stop them rewarding other players who do this like Puopolo/Selwood/most of the WC team. I don't like to see Sonny doing it though but there were players from both sides last weekend who were doing it with alarming regularity.

Having said that though the Lake incident was actually there as you can see above.

 

[Righteo]

Go back to your board you flog.

Any chance you could post this in the relevant thread on the MRP board Seppo?

 

[estibador]

AFL should schedule us to play Hawthorn in the first couple of rounds. Since the umpires refused to give us a single free kick for blatant infringements (and actually gave Hawthorn a free for one of them) we at least deserve to benefit from their suspensions.

 

[Noodleman]

Frustrates me that this wasn't paid 50 on the day.

Walters got the goal, but blatant late contact should have been penalised.

Frustrates me that this wasn't paid 50 on the day.

Walters got the goal, but blatant late contact should have been penalised.

tell your woman with the generic tattoo parlour tatts to take a glancing blow like a man. the one against Sydney was worse. he is getting a reputation like leroy jetta

 

[Reginald Perrin]

tell your woman with the generic tattoo parlour tatts to take a glancing blow like a man. the one against Sydney was worse. he is getting a reputation like leroy jetta

And you're getting a holiday. Good bye.

 

[Righteo]

A glancing blow would be like only receiving a yellow card for trolling.

 

[Kunna17]

Rioli got a point, Walters goal.

mcphaflin 50 vs that???
Umps on your side but you deserved to win and would have won anyway.
Some people cant get over the fact that in vic. vic. sides get the umps.
And they think we would have won, take it with a grain of salt mate, your team played much better than ours on the day, well - took the most of your chances. Hope we learn from you guys and do exactly what you did from 2012-2013.

 

[MadMac]

tell your woman with the generic tattoo parlour tatts to take a glancing blow like a man. the one against Sydney was worse. he is getting a reputation like leroy jetta

That's what your input is worth. Now piss off back to your board or your noodles will get cold