KermitJagger
Professional Thread Derailer
- May 17, 2017
- 16,412
- 53,870
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
Develop your strengths
Acknowledge your weaknesses
That's 100% Sam's mentality.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Develop your strengths
Acknowledge your weaknesses
Develop your strengths
Acknowledge your weaknesses
Really enjoy the walk and talk stuff tbh.
Really hoping that Day can come back and play very early on next season, and really hoping that Sam's strengh's based approach to coaching works well for the young group.
Is that you Matty Suckling?"I acknowledge I suck at running, kicking and general skills work, BUT I'm real good at dogging a 50m dart, so I'm gonna work on that some more."
Josh Caddy should be publicly stoned for crimes against football. Shit truck of a player ruining careersReally surprising he isn't in full training yet, the club were definetly tight lipped about how severe his injury was.
Mitchell played that gameThe Stkilda game where we got smashed he was top 5 on the ground without JOM and Mitchell around him. Was 2019 form. Looks a different player when given more ownership of responsibility which suggests he has good leadership capabilities
Word was he rolled it late in the GWS game.Day’s ankle injury occurred Rd2 on the 28th of March some 9 months ago. He did come back Rd13-15 and his last game v Giants gathered 29 disposals. Then from memory he was absent for the rest season due to the ankle pulling up sore? Was great to hear that Day is running again but does anyone know anymore details around his journey/progress with his ankle?
Sam was not open to trading one of them out.Sam believes in Worpel(Newk and Nash too I assume), that’s why he was open to trading one of Tom or JOM out.
Yes Sam was willing to trade any senior if the price was right, including O'Meara and T Mitchell.Sam was not open to trading one of them out.
Yes Sam was willing to trade any senior if the price was right, including O'Meara and T Mitchell.
That's silly though. I'm not willing to sell my house, but if someone offered me double its value I'm not gonna say no. Almost every player in the league is up for trade for "the right price".
There's a difference between willingness to trade a player and desire to do so.
I don’t know how you could arrive at this conclusion, in the face of everything that took place over the trade period, and everything that McCartney and others have said since.Sam was not open to trading one of them out.
That's silly though. I'm not willing to sell my house, but if someone offered me double its value I'm not gonna say no. Almost every player in the league is up for trade for "the right price".
There's a difference between willingness to trade a player and desire to do so.
There is nothing contradictory about these two posts.You can take that up with the HFC, all older players were told they could be in trade discussions. It is, what it is!
Mitchell, O'Meara, Bruest and Wingard were all in talks.
I think this is one of those discussions where both parties could be right. Rogie's house analogy probably sums it up.I don’t know how you could arrive at this conclusion, in the face of everything that took place over the trade period, and everything that McCartney and others have said since.
We weren’t looking to sell at double the value though. If what the media and our own ITKs were saying is true, we were entertaining compensation that most on this forum would say is a little less than their value. Fortunately or unfortunately (whichever way you look at it), the discussions never really evolved and the entire trade period remained in deadlock, but it was pretty clear were keen on getting another top round pick by moving on at least one of those guys.That's silly though. I'm not willing to sell my house, but if someone offered me double its value I'm not gonna say no. Almost every player in the league is up for trade for "the right price".
There's a difference between willingness to trade a player and desire to do so.
And the Dogs would trade the Bont for Gawn an Pettracca. Sam was not open to a realistic trade.Yes Sam was willing to trade any senior if the price was right, including O'Meara and T Mitchell.
We weren’t looking to sell at double the value though. If what the media and our own ITKs were saying is true, we were entertaining compensation that most on this forum would say is a little less than their value. Fortunately or unfortunately (whichever way you look at it), the discussions never really evolved and the entire trade period remained in deadlock, but it was pretty clear were keen on getting another top round pick by moving on at least one of those guys.
Day’s ankle injury occurred Rd2 on the 28th of March some 9 months ago. He did come back Rd13-15 and his last game v Giants gathered 29 disposals. Then from memory he was absent for the rest season due to the ankle pulling up sore? Was great to hear that Day is running again but does anyone know anymore details around his journey/progress with his ankle?
Didn't he have a surgery to clean it up at the end of the season so that is probably why.I thought word was that Day could have played in the last round of the season but the club were playing it safe?
That really does not seem to marry up with still not in full training come late December.
Glad they are taking it slow now in any case, rather be 100% certain with something as finicky as an ankle.
And the Dogs would trade the Bont for Gawn an Pettracca. Sam was not open to a realistic trade.
If the club was really that bothered, and the players had strong feelings that we wanted to get rid of them, they wouldn't have stayed so happily. That's where this whole line of reasoning falls apart.
I'm going to take Sam's words on faith, and that was though they were open to fielding offers the players were no realistic chance of actually being traded.