Won’t be back you’d imagine.
What a loser.
North fans though, as always, classic.
What a loser.
North fans though, as always, classic.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Rubbed out for 18 weeks. Could draft him I guess but he couldn’t play.
He’s an idiot and incredibly immature and he also attracts and seeks out people similarly volatile to him which doesn’t helpYeah this has been going on since 2022 and he has had numerous warnings including nearly getting a criminal record for threatening to share intimate images. It is pretty damning when you continue to threaten women whilst doing a club paid for program explicitly telling you not to threaten women. Not the sharpest tool in the shed.
Should of
Should have.
People who think he wont get another chance are delusional as the kid has way too much talent and this kick up the backside will do him the world of good.
Bombers would be the most likely with Scott as coach followed closely by Saints
From the AFL statement:What's the timeline of events that has lead to this. Apologies for my ignorance do we know exactly what he did this last time?
Given AFLW it's not going to be a good look for any club to pick him up.People who think he wont get another chance are delusional as the kid has way too much talent and this kick up the backside will do him the world of good.
Bombers would be the most likely with Scott as coach followed closely by Saints
huh? I would hope it didn't. Should have been an easy decision for them; they can't have one of their members acting that way. They have nothing to defend or negotiate.If you mean in wider society; that's true.
But most people aren't also protected by an incredibly strong union like the AFLPA.
If NMFC have sacked Tarryn, that's only come after intense negotation with the AFLPA I am certain.
The facts are that he has threatened violence against women on multiple occasions over a period of at least 2 years despite repeated warnings and chances to correct/cease this behaviour.For those of us who prefer to base our assessment on actual evidence, what are the facts of the case?
I get people wanting to pile on him and judge him for what they imagine or have 'heard' he has done.
Yeah because there's no women in the aflpa!....If you mean in wider society; that's true.
But most people aren't also protected by an incredibly strong union like the AFLPA.
If NMFC have sacked Tarryn, that's only come after intense negotation with the AFLPA I am certain.
Yeah because there's no women in the aflpa!....
this coming from a club who thought it was morally appropriate to recruit StringerNorth fans patting the club on the back for doing the right thing months after it should've is amazing to read.
That's like asking a methhead to not be aggressive and violent, or a pig not to roll in shit. The guy has some serious chemical imbalance or something.Definitely the right call. He was on his last legs last time, and he blew it.
I know it obviously comes down to serious personality defects at the end of the day, but I don't understand why it's so hard for blokes like him and other celebrities that go nuts to at least pretend to be normal and earn millions of dollars before your 30s. Surely you can avoid threatening women for at least a few years?
I've already said, multiple times in the other Thomas thread, that wasn't a good idea.this coming from a club who thought it was morally appropriate to recruit Stringer
I think they’ve sacked himThey won’t delist him though due to the off chance someone wants to sign him.
Will stay on the list so they can work out what happens with his money etc.
It’s been established as fact. The club endorsed the AFL’s findings. TT and his lawyer and his manager haven’t attempted to refute the factual basis of the infringements, even though they’ve had the opportunity.Has it been established as fact what he actually did?
I get people wanting to pile on him and judge him for what they imagine or have 'heard' he has done.
For those of us who prefer to base our assessment on actual evidence, what are the facts of the case?
As for Tarryn himself, he's only 23, that's still a kid to me, I hope he picks himself up and overcomes this.
He obviously made some mistakes for things to have ended up here, but he is still young enough to learn from them.
Maybe in a few years we will see him playing professional football and living a good life off the field.
There are such things as redemption arcs and even if it is for another club, I hope a good career is still ahead of him.
There are plenty of people out there who have thrown golden opportunities away, in all walks of life.
Tarryn could go on to learn and grow and make positive changes to his life and become a better person.
If he does this, it could be an example for other people who have messed up to look to, to see there's always hope.
aged wellThey won’t delist him though due to the off chance someone wants to sign him.
Will stay on the list so they can work out what happens with his money etc.
Never reply to a contrarian.It’s been established as fact. The club endorsed the AFL’s findings. TT and his lawyer and his manager haven’t attempted to refute the factual basis of the infringements, even though they’ve had the opportunity.
Just because the commission hasn’t laid out a forensic level of detail for public consumption doesnt mean it hasn’t been established as fact by all the lawyers involved. The victims right to privacy has just been deemed more important than the desirability of us to know every salacious element, and fair enough. The people who need to know, know.