Opinion The Adelaide Board Politics/COVID Thread Part 3

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.
Don't go out at night


Is Boston a Safe City?​

Boston is not a safe city. Per square mile, Boston has significantly higher crime rates compared to the national average. The national average crime rate, per square mile, is 31.1 crimes. Boston experiences 399 crimes per square mile.

However, although there are high levels of crime, the average resident or traveler should not feel unsafe while visiting Boston during the day. If residents and tourists are smart about being in the city, they shouldn’t experience violent crime or property crime.

Some areas of Boston are considered extremely safe. However, since many parts of the town are extremely dangerous, those in Boston shouldn’t let their guards down.

Grow a set mate.

Never felt threatened in any of my overseas jaunts - whether it be Europe, Asia, South America or North America. It is what one calls, travel and street smarts.

You seem to be what I’d expect from a Trumper - scaredy-cat.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Sane people don't send people that are mentally and physically incapable to do anything let alone be a senator. Fetterman is absolutely not fit to represent anything regardless his views, he literally can't string a sentence together and does not know where he is






That last answer to the question was a classic.


He did have a good start to the night


Hi, goodnight, everybody.

 
The part of the judgement that caught my attention, which is just simply an obvious fact to anyone with a quarter of a brain:

Judge Ralph J. Porzio wrote in his ruling that if the vaccine mandate was about “safety and public health, unvaccinated workers would have been placed on leave the moment the order was issued.”

What? So it didn’t end up being a “pandemic of the unvaccinated”? Surely they wouldn’t mandate vaccination for groups at near zero risk unless it was absolutely certain that they posed the only material danger to the nannas of cap, Fonz, OGC, Val (RIP), 1990 (I miss him so much) and the rest of the lemmings.
 
Grow a set mate.

Never felt threatened in any of my overseas jaunts - whether it be Europe, Asia, South America or North America. It is what one calls, travel and street smarts.

You seem to be what I’d expect from a Trumper - scaredy-cat.
Need street smarts when you spend a few months in the Caribbean...
 
You can't make this up

Ann Arbor mayor installs new gas fireplace amid city’s push for home electrification​

Taylor defended the decision, saying he and his wife wanted a real fireplace — not an electric one — and it’s his understanding a gas fireplace is 75% more carbon-efficient than burning wood, citing the Sierra Club as a source.



“An electric fireplace isn’t really a fireplace,” he said of his reasons for not considering that option.

 
Like the Dems say "my body my choice except for ....................." fill in the missing words

That’s what I couldn’t quite understand with the Roe v Wade decision. If there is a constitutional right to privacy re your own body, then surely it’s absolute. It shouldn’t be up to politically aligned appointed judges to then effectively write law based upon their own leanings/biases. That’s what governments voted in by the people are for. Not jobs for life lawyers.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Like the Dems say "my body my choice except for ....................." fill in the missing words
Everyone had a choice with vaccines.

Unlike the r*ped 10 year old..who didn't have a choice to either be r*ped or be forced to have the baby.

But you and your mobs love the old false equivalence.
 
Last edited:
I see both sides to this. I'm interested in your view on the available alternative courses of action at the time. Not trolling, genuinely interested. I've spent time thinking about all this and I'm not sure what other options would have led to better outcomes.

It’s very simple, when you mandate the taking of a drug based upon the premise that an unvaccinated is an unacceptable danger to others, then that premise needs to have some science in support. Deleting informed consent should not be taken lightly and especially when the profit makers refused to accept liability for ill-effects.
 
Good to see you are keeping it simple.

Mind you, the stench of disappointment lingers
I will say that I am disappointed you've stopped the whining-about-being-banned posts. I thought they were fresher than the insult-the-people-who-find-your-posts-unintelligible posts, and the new strategy had the additional benefit of being much less work for you.
 
Everyone had a choice with vaccines.

Unlike the r*ped 10 year old..who didn't have a choice to either be r*ped or be forced to have the baby.

But you and your mobs love the old false equivalence.
Selective example although horrible anyway what happened. I recall that case and it had a few issues in both camps. Wasn't it also an illegal that was the rapist. Everyone didn't have a real choice with vaccine. Those that were praise heroes prior to vaccine were given the sack if they didn't take it later. The military was reduced. Some of the fittest people on the planet forced to take it.
1970crows response above is just about spot on.
 
More..this time from LWNJ rag the Washington Post

Cliffs:

-In late 2020 Pfizer and Moderna said their vaccines were 90% and 94% effective at stopping infection. (We now know they didn’t even test for it.)

-In summer 2021 (June) the White House realized the vaccine wasn’t doing shit in terms of stopping Delta infection.



Pfizer-BioNTech announced after the 2020 elections that their vaccine was more than 90 percent effective at preventing infection. Weeks later, Moderna announced over 94 percent efficacy at preventing infection.

Nearly everything the president and his scientific advisers assumed for the next six months hinged on those numbers, even though it would become clear that summer that the vaccines — though highly effective at stopping death and hospitalization — did a far worse job of blocking infection than originally expected, as potency waned and new, more transmissible variants emerged.

Just three weeks later — spurred, in part, by a delta outbreak among a highly vaccinated population in Provincetown, Mass. — the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended that even fully vaccinated people wear masks indoors.
 
Last edited:
It’s very simple, when you mandate the taking of a drug based upon the premise that an unvaccinated is an unacceptable danger to others, then that premise needs to have some science in support. Deleting informed consent should not be taken lightly and especially when the profit makers refused to accept liability for ill-effects.
I don't disagree with any of that. Except we're not talking about the measles. We're talking about an emergency response to disease a which killed quite a few people. With governments desperate for a solution, do you think Pfizer would have agreed to a fast roll-out without some sort of indemnity?
 
Selective example although horrible anyway what happened. I recall that case and it had a few issues in both camps. Wasn't it also an illegal that was the rapist. Everyone didn't have a real choice with vaccine. Those that were praise heroes prior to vaccine were given the sack if they didn't take it later. The military was reduced. Some of the fittest people on the planet forced to take it.
1970crows response above is just about spot on.
Everyone had a choice with vaccines, everyone. I understand you want to frame it is as 'real', that's what most people do when trying to be unaccountable.

Sure, you can deflect the fact that you are happy for any r*ped woman to be forced to keep a baby, or women with dead babies in their wombs, or partial miscarriages or catastrophic birth defects.

How you face your female family and try to compare a little injection to abortion is beyond me.as I said, having a penis doesn't make you a man.
 
I don't disagree with any of that. Except we're not talking about the measles. We're talking about an emergency response to disease a which killed quite a few people. With governments desperate for a solution, do you think Pfizer would have agreed to a fast roll-out without some sort of indemnity?
And I agree with that in part. Pfizer would have done its risk assessment prior release. It was great having it, but governments should have been doing parallel and ongoing studies before issuing mandates. A few countries did but he CDC in the USA sat on its behind. Politics. I had 2 shots of Astra Zenica and still got Covid and was hospitalized.
 
Everyone had a choice with vaccines, everyone. I understand you want to frame it is as 'real', that's what most people do when trying to be unaccountable.

Sure, you can deflect the fact that you are happy for any r*ped woman to be forced to keep a baby, or women with dead babies in their wombs, or partial miscarriages or catastrophic birth defects.

How you face your female family and try to compare a little injection to abortion is beyond me.as I said, having a penis doesn't make you a man.
Wow, Youve really stepped this up. I think you would find most if not all states have exceptions like you mentioned in their laws.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top