I have no doubt that adding Warner would make us better. He is top tier in the competition, so by definition he makes us better. But I don't think it is as simple as that. And the case against Chad doesn't just apply to Chad. It has implications across our list management.
I see several negatives regarding going after him:
Role
Any trade target needs to be more than an improvement , they need to be a difference maker.
Cost
The salary cap and trade costs must be justified by the trade targets ability to improve a weak area of our game.
Culture
With the list profile we have built I think we cannot afford a top-dollar recruiting strategy. We can't afford to fight off clubs coming after our top end players with the same attitude, and if course they will.
Of course it is a business for players. But wanting to play for Fremantle and a chance to make history should be at the core.
List management must prioritise the strengthening of club culture around the emerging leadership group.
I see several negatives regarding going after him:
Role
- our current core midfield of Brayshaw, Serong and Young is impeccably balance. Bolton rotating there also adds to the mix at the top level, and also provides rotational opportunities for our core 3 (especially Young and Serong) as forward line disrupters. We spent big on Jackson to be more than a forward/ruck, and Warner playing on ball would reduce that opportunity. I don't think adding Warner makes us better.
- we currently have 3 high potential on-ballers waiting their opportunity in Johnson, Erasmus and Reid. Warner coming in almost shuts the gate on the first two. If we were trading them for Warner I'd understand. But the more likely outcome to me looks like a Brodie situation: we may be better, but doesn't make an impact?
- I'm not sure how rotating Warner would work, but I could see him rotating with Brayshaw on the wing and on ball. I don't think wing is the position those 2 were born to play, and I'm not sure that it makes us better. O'Driscoll seems primed to play wing/rotating on ball, and the club seems bullish about his progress. Sharp I assume is locked in.
Any trade target needs to be more than an improvement , they need to be a difference maker.
Cost
- Salary cap will take a hit, and I expect he would become our highest paid player. I'm not loving that and think at some level it sets a precedent that bights us in the future.
- in the final pre-Tasmania draft, it will cost big time, and it will be several drafts until we have a crack at the high end talent. Not good.
- Kozi may be a pipe dream or he may be all but on the way. Warner would make signing Kozi a lot more difficult, and there is no doubt that Kozi is a better list need, and the more likely to provide a greater impact for us.
The salary cap and trade costs must be justified by the trade targets ability to improve a weak area of our game.
Culture
With the list profile we have built I think we cannot afford a top-dollar recruiting strategy. We can't afford to fight off clubs coming after our top end players with the same attitude, and if course they will.
Of course it is a business for players. But wanting to play for Fremantle and a chance to make history should be at the core.
List management must prioritise the strengthening of club culture around the emerging leadership group.