The clubs who don’t change their name for Indigenous round are white supremacists
- Thread starter Stronzo
- Start date
- Tagged users None
Did you have a problem with the AFL having a Round last week denouncing domestic/gender violence against women (and families/kids) ??
What is wanky/ and meaningless virtue signalling to you, means so much to many many other folks in the community.
I do agree money/profits from these Indigenous Rounds should be directed towards helping Aboriginal Housing/Education/Health (education about domestic violence in their communities etc).
- Dec 24, 2022
- 22,135
- 17,662
- AFL Club
- Richmond
- Other Teams
- Cavaliers
Do you need to even ask him when he lives in the state capital of violence and meth heads?
Last edited:
AKA wHeN Is sTrAiGhT wHiTe MaLe RoUnD
We have a better win % at Perf stadium than at the MCG so… nice try
I think what I love most about these arguments is that when actual solutions and improvements are offered up, many of the people making the above argument also don't want to do that.
One thing is for sure, Sir Doug round and indigenous round are guaranteed to get the broflakes melting on socials
- Banned
- #85
In other news, good to see the pole correctly identified Bottom4thorn as the Most Racist Club
Maybe they can trade for Tex - Jeff's golliwog collection should get the deal done
Maybe they can trade for Tex - Jeff's golliwog collection should get the deal done
- Banned
- #89
Saveloy is a deadset flog, but racists are much worse.
I hate racists more now for making me agree with him
Poland 0
Spain 0
I'm not actually from Poland. I changed it to that because a Richmond Board mod got upset because I voted on one or their board's polls.
No comments or "reacts" - literally just voted on a poll they had.
- Banned
- #92
- Feb 27, 2011
- 15,628
- 17,574
- AFL Club
- Collingwood
That's what these types don't get. They think green energy is some unlimited, free resource.
That's what these types don't get. They think green energy is some unlimited, free resource.
That's what people like you don't understand.
Yes, there is an environmental cost to mining the minerals needed for battery technology (currently). But it's offset by the reduction in need for the continual requirement, ongoing, of burning massive amounts of fossil fuels for eternity to provide power.
Similarly, it's better to have electric vehicles even if they did require fossil fuels to generate the electricity for their use because it's more efficient to reduce pollution at the source (ie the power plant) than it is to do it across millions of points (ie your shitbox Leyland P76 and others like it).
- Banned
- #95
Yeah grouse, now the coal powerplants needs to pump out twice the amount of power putting the grid under constant strain, not to mention we need to mine lithium with nowhere to dump the shit, just to keep all of your flogs cars running, so you can virtue signal to the world.
- Apr 12, 2006
- 23,011
- 26,798
- AFL Club
- Geelong
- Other Teams
- Tottenham Hotspurs, Victory
It's because the "activists" have vested interest in the status quo - 1)Hand in cookie jar; 2)A club to bash non-activists with.
Ultimate Machiavellism, pro-gamer move.
Geelong was and still is the only club to have an indigenous name FULL-TIME, not only when the AFL mandates it. All you other bandwagoning racist institutions can GAGF.
Stronzo
Hall of Famer
- Thread starter
- #98
But if you’ve centralised where the pollution is being produced you can more easily deal with it.
Do you think that power generation and battery technology will remain stagnant?
A lot of people have been sucked in by fossil fuel propaganda, don’t be one of them.
