The thrill of the possibilitiesLosing is stressful. Winning is stressful. We are stressed for most of every year! Why do we do this to ourselves?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The thrill of the possibilitiesLosing is stressful. Winning is stressful. We are stressed for most of every year! Why do we do this to ourselves?
Not much doubt about that , as if you don't have some sort of impact as sub next step is back to the VFL.You'd have to say this season that generally players dropped or coming off the sub role have played well.
Perhaps it's working to give them a rev up?
Would keep Lobb if he wants to stay but suspect he may seek a trade himself at the end of the yearAnd what happens if Darcy gets hurt for an extended period? Buku back to forward/ruck. We’ve been blessed with the availability of English, Naughton and Jamarra the last season and a bit but it’s not always going to be the case. Think Lobb is still worth keeping around
Didn't Chris Grant move back and by rights should have won a Brownlow?
Wallace used him as a swing man. Sadly he didn't move him back in the 97 prelim and that probably cost us the game (and a flag).
No doubt Weightman influences the game with his early goals that require a change of plans for the opposition. Can only be good if he can disrupt the opposition's plans and open up opportunities for others.Another way of looking at it is that when he has gotten a few early goals, is that they send a defender to him that his sole objective is to put the clamps on Weightman. Which they achieve but they are pretty much down a defender offensively as they don't drop off to roll over and be third one up. Or try and link up once they get possession.
Also has the flow on effect of opening up the forward line as Weightman just drags his man away from the fall of the ball.
Then try and use his smarts to get involved after
They did play poorly ... how much of that was down to our team's pressure?As a team we have shown that we can play pretty well when things are on our terms, and everything is "clicking". Credit where credit is due, but how much of the result was down to the opposition having a really poor night? That being said, we won convincingly which is always better than losing.
My recollection was Grant played CHB in 96 and when Wallace took over from 97 he played predominantly forward. Spent little time in defence during the Wallace period.Wallace used him as a swing man. Sadly he didn't move him back in the 97 prelim and that probably cost us the game (and a flag).
Our team's pressure was good, at the standard it needs to be. Likewise, Saint's pressure was uncharacteristically bad, which allowed us to do what we please for most of the game.They did play poorly ... how much of that was down to our team's pressure?
Saints hadn't lost by any more than 5 points
Yes and the bullshit that keeps getting spouted about him being on massive coin is just wrong.Lobb does a lot of stuff that goes unnoticed. Dummy leads, blocks, bringing the ball to the front of a contest (yes that’s a skill, a lot of our other talls don’t do it). Naughton & Weightman look better when he’s in the side.
He’s been in systems with Jeremy Cameron, Patton, Green etc and Freo are very system based with those little things for their big guys. He’d have good intel.
He’s no fool as a footballer and is a handy experienced guy for Naughton, JUH and Darcy to learn off.
Lobb is what he is. A serviceable ruck/2nd key fwd who will do those little things week-to-week and bob up with a bag a few times a year.
A lot of fans expect too much from him.
Nearly beat the plastics away from home. King was non existent in that.They were missing King, Crouch, Webster, Henry, Wood and Paton and maybe another one or two from their best 18.
Yes, two of the best three missing from the game were ours (Libba & Marra), but I reckon that depleted Saints side in their third game in 11 days wasn’t the hardest opponent.
I won’t be raising my hopes for this team’s prospects this year off the back of this win, as enjoyable as it was. Will instead be watching keenly to see what we do against Freo.
Nearly beat the plastics away from home. King was non existent in that.
Some of those others are VFL plodders
Paton certainly isn't.Those 6 I named are all best 18 for the Saints when available
A very astute observation, perhaps because it matches mine. I rate him much better than serviceable. He’s a superior tap ruckman to English and/or Darcy and, as you point out, has the best forward craft in the team.Lobb does a lot of stuff that goes unnoticed. Dummy leads, blocks, bringing the ball to the front of a contest (yes that’s a skill, a lot of our other talls don’t do it). Naughton & Weightman look better when he’s in the side.
He’s been in systems with Jeremy Cameron, Patton, Green etc and Freo are very system based with those little things for their big guys. He’d have good intel.
He’s no fool as a footballer and is a handy experienced guy for Naughton, JUH and Darcy to learn off.
Lobb is what he is. A serviceable ruck/2nd key fwd who will do those little things week-to-week and bob up with a bag a few times a year.
A lot of fans expect too much from him.
Paton certainly isn't.
Webster debatable.
Wood was good last year at times but isn't flash
Thing is, any time the dogs play well even our supporters try to make excuses for the opposition ..Webster’s played 1 VFL game and 57 AFL games the last 3 years so he’s not really debatable. Paton, maybe. It’s picking nits though, they were pretty bad and there were some reasons for it. Hard to take too much from it for us.
Perhaps indicative of the infrequency of playing wellThing is, any time the dogs play well even our supporters try to make excuses for the opposition ..
Thing is, any time the dogs play well even our supporters try to make excuses for the opposition ..
Always a bit of a throwaway line 'they were missing'...They were missing King, Crouch, Webster, Henry, Wood and Paton and maybe another one or two from their best 18.
Yes, two of the best three missing from the game were ours (Libba & Marra), but I reckon that depleted Saints side in their third game in 11 days wasn’t the hardest opponent.
I won’t be raising my hopes for this team’s prospects this year off the back of this win, as enjoyable as it was. Will instead be watching keenly to see what we do against Freo.
Always a bit of a throwaway line 'they were missing'...
It's not as if they don't replace them with new players.
Ross Lyon always gets his soldiers up
Grand total of their losses was a goal before Thursday.Seems it’s just me but I didn’t think they looked particularly up for it on Thursday. If others think differently that presumably bodes well for us against Freo.