Definitely rather him trading for picks, even if it’s just improving picks in the same round, than trading for fringe guys that aren’t going to make an impact in our team and will end up costing us extra $. Good work I think.Dog 36 said:
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 9 - Indigenous Round - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
The Official Bulldogs Trade and Delistings Thread
- Thread starter Rocco Jones
- Start date
- Tagged users None
G-Mo77 said:
Well that's just #$@^^&!@#ing wonderful. We just offloaded a hack and I'll be bitterly disappointed to pick up a worse one. Surely we could have outbidded pick 52?
Not getting Saddington means we're in line to pick up an even greater dud than Bowden.
bulldogtragic
Premiership Player
Re: Saddington gone
I suppose they could pay him what they wanted.
Makes Bowden at 56 seem reasonable.
I suppose they could pay him what they wanted.
Makes Bowden at 56 seem reasonable.
I can't beleive Saddington has gone to Carlton for a fourt round draft pick (52).
I would have thought he would have been a good fit - actually - it's the money, he wants 220, apparently we don't have room to move under the cap.
I would have thought he would have been a good fit - actually - it's the money, he wants 220, apparently we don't have room to move under the cap.
acker said:
It IS bad if we pursue another trade - Bolton would instantly become a new whipping boy.
Damn West Coast, they'd better not trade Gaspar. Remember people, we're al barracking against the Roos doing any Hay/Gaspar trades, so they'll trade for Rawlings.
Dogs 13
Premium Platinum
Rookie said:
Well we need someone to replace Patty in that role
But PLEASE not Bolton.
Jim Main rates Bolton at the same level as Saddington except Bolton hasn't had a major injury.
We need to get someone or we won't take the next step - we play the sort of game where teams will just shut us down - I think we got under a lot of teams guard in the last couple of games this year.
We need someone to kick to - someone who will win 8 out of 10 one on one contests.
Is Walsh, Skipper going to step up??
C'mon Tom Williams become our next 'Chris Grant'
AAAAAArrrrghhhhhhhhhhhhh.......
Go Dogs!
We need to get someone or we won't take the next step - we play the sort of game where teams will just shut us down - I think we got under a lot of teams guard in the last couple of games this year.
We need someone to kick to - someone who will win 8 out of 10 one on one contests.
Is Walsh, Skipper going to step up??
C'mon Tom Williams become our next 'Chris Grant'
AAAAAArrrrghhhhhhhhhhhhh.......
Go Dogs!
bulldogtragic
Premiership Player
Sydney - Apparently the only other club interested in Pods have 52 & 55.
Essendon have pick 51.
Perhaps a Bandy or Brad Murphy for pick 51.
With getting no tall mature blokes, I've come around and think we should be drafting him. We've got 43 but thats a bit too high. Unless Jade goes through for pick 47?
Essendon have pick 51.
Perhaps a Bandy or Brad Murphy for pick 51.
With getting no tall mature blokes, I've come around and think we should be drafting him. We've got 43 but thats a bit too high. Unless Jade goes through for pick 47?
Re: Saddington gone
im a little confused.
i thought saddington was on our list of players to have a look at, and the reason we declined him was because he was asking for too much money.
they we get rid of rawlings and bowden which would of freed up a bit, then never got him?
woulda thought with these two gone, even iof we paid half their salary each, this would pay for saddingtons wage.
dissapointed by our trading this year.
im a little confused.
i thought saddington was on our list of players to have a look at, and the reason we declined him was because he was asking for too much money.
they we get rid of rawlings and bowden which would of freed up a bit, then never got him?
woulda thought with these two gone, even iof we paid half their salary each, this would pay for saddingtons wage.
dissapointed by our trading this year.
Re: Saddington gone
might have been the order in which things occured.
saddington was gone before we got rid of bowdo and rawligns was the last trade of the week, just before the deadline
I think put some kind of worst case $$ scenario on the table for sydney where we offered our 3rd round pick, as long as Sydney paid a portion of saddingtons wage in 06, but then carlton cae along and said for a 4th round pick they sydney wouldnt have to pay anything.
might have been the order in which things occured.
saddington was gone before we got rid of bowdo and rawligns was the last trade of the week, just before the deadline
I think put some kind of worst case $$ scenario on the table for sydney where we offered our 3rd round pick, as long as Sydney paid a portion of saddingtons wage in 06, but then carlton cae along and said for a 4th round pick they sydney wouldnt have to pay anything.
