Rumour The Thread formerly known as the rumour file, now with zero rumours

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

As in I'm a bit mental or I'm angry?

I'm only angry because I hate this stupid time of year. I hate trades and drafting and all these crappy rumours flying around. And I especially hate DIDAK bleghhhhhhh

Shame I can't like this more than once.
 
Talking about Stephen Milne is not the kind of dirty talk I'm into!

But you are into it?

xo3b.png
 
Time to get nervous.

@TonySheahan: carltonfc coach Mick Malthouse is set to become collingwoodfc worst nightmare. The frmr Pies' coach hosted star @dids_04 yday touring Visy

Tony Sheahan is usually pretty spot on too. Feck, feck, FECK!!

If we get him, if I was Garlett, Buckley or even Menzel I wouldn't even be mad if they asked for a trade. Utter bullshit decision if we get him.

A ****ing has-been small forward. Yeah like we don't already have enough small forwards running around? Herp de derp he won't cost anything you beauty! He won't cost anything because he is crap now, and it costs us a bloody spot on our list we could allocate to an 18-19 year old hungry draftee who could have the potential to play for the CFC for the next 12 years! Not to mention Didak is a shit bloke. If, IF this happens, I want a barbeque hosted by Mick every day for a week convincing us why this logically would be a good move.

Let's pray that it's completely untrue, and if it is true, pray he's on board as a kicking coach or something rather than a player.

My blood is boiling reading that tripe.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

What possible need do we have for Didak? We have too many small forwards as it is. If (read when) we lose Eddie, why replace him with Didak? We will effectively have the same number of small forwards as this year. Plus he's a tool.
 
Tony Sheehan tweeting didak being shown through visy. 16 years as a member may come to an end. Nepotism by mick. I dreaded this. Y not look at chappy instead.
Bet he looks keener than Riskaplasmatelly and Bradshaw.
 
What possible need do we have for Didak? We have too many small forwards as it is. If (read when) we lose Eddie, why replace him with Didak? We will effectively have the same number of small forwards as this year. Plus he's a tool, and shit, and too old and crappy to run through the midfield.


EFA.
 
Terrible decision if true re: didak. what need do we have for him? i would rather play Menzel for 22 games than fricken didak.

Seriously all we are getting is collingwood's sloppy seconds. Its a bit embarrassing really.

If he has signed i hope its for bear minimum. Surely he wouldnt be on anything over $150000 a year? why would we pay him any more? if we have i would be livid.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top