The war against renewable energy

Remove this Banner Ad

Batteries is just one form of storage
Of course, but the primary storage solution appears to be batteries.

I'm critical of the myth that sun and wind will solve all of our power issues. It's clear we need some form of storage that itself requires heavy industry and mining to produce.

Plus, we'll need some sort of fossil fuel backup as renewables by their very nature aren't reliable.

And heaven help us if their is a huge volcano like Mount Tambora which led to the "year without a summer". Imagine months with little solar production.
 
Last edited:
EV battery packs to be $80US a kWh.

What would Goldman Sacha know???



Just remember the environmental footprint of those lithium batteries. In Chile's Salar de Atacama, mining operations consume around 21 million litres of water per day and use around 65% of the region’s water, leading to severe water shortages.

 

Log in to remove this ad.

Just remember the environmental footprint of those lithium batteries. In Chile's Salar de Atacama, mining operations consume around 21 million litres of water per day and use around 65% of the region’s water, leading to severe water shortages.


Probably the reason BYD is going down this path. At the moment they seem to be better suited to fixed storage than Automotive use.

 
Probably the reason BYD is going down this path. At the moment they seem to be better suited to fixed storage than Automotive use.


Sodium ion is predicted to grow at 16% pa to a value of under 1 Billion USD by 2030. Lithium ion is predicted to grow by 25% pa to a value of 400 Billion USD by 2030.

Sodium ion looks like a 10+ year proposition to a problem (replace fossil fuel) that needs solving within 10 years.
 
I wouldn't believe it too much. Reneweconomy is as biased towards renewables as Newscorp is as biased towards fossil fuels.

The truth will be somewhere in the middle.

So you don’t believe sodium batteries are cheaper and more suited to large scale batteries? And providing there is enough battery storage, there isn’t a need for fossil fuels?
Newscorp is complete rubbish.
 
Well the new emissions legislation won’t apply to trucks vans and Utes. The very vehicles which are on the road hours per day in residential areas.

We have it arse about face

This class of vehicle splits vehicle pollution 50-50 with private cars

Vans and utes are dreadful.
A truck rolling up the freeway is probably producing less CO2/kwh than a Coal Power station.
 
So you don’t believe sodium batteries are cheaper and more suited to large scale batteries? And providing there is enough battery storage, there isn’t a need for fossil fuels?
Newscorp is complete rubbish.

No I don't think we'll ever install a minimum 160GWh of batteries to make it possible to be cut off from fossil fuels. Realistically, you'd need 300GWh of batteries installed to cover off on risks from consecutive days where we don't generate enough renewable energy to recharge the batteries.

SA have 200MW, which is like 20MWh if it has to last 10 hours installed.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

you'd need 300GWh of batteries installed to cover off on risks from consecutive days where we don't generate enough renewable energy to recharge the batteries.

Source please ….

And you do realise solar still works when it’s cloudy.

Here’s what AEMO says….

Integrated System Plan (ISP) forecasts Australia will need at least 49GW of storage by 2050 in order to reach net zero. As mentioned, this storage capacity will include a mix of pumped hydro, virtual power plants and batteries, including home battery systems. AEMO also sees a significant role for coordinated consumer energy resources (CER) including home batteries. Home battery systems surpassed 250,000 by the end of 2023, accounting for more than 2700 MW hours of capacity. While this number may seem high, around 3.7 million Australian homes have rooftop solar units installed, meaning less than one in 14 households with solar units have home battery systems installed. To achieve the current ISP capacity of coordinated CER, storage will need to rise from today’s 0.2 GW to 3.7 GW in 2029-30 and increase tenfold to 37 GW in 2049-50. If achieved, it is projected it would account for up to 66 per cent of the NEM’s energy storage nameplate capacity.
 
Source please ….

And you do realise solar still works when it’s cloudy.

Here’s what AEMO says….

Integrated System Plan (ISP) forecasts Australia will need at least 49GW of storage by 2050 in order to reach net zero. As mentioned, this storage capacity will include a mix of pumped hydro, virtual power plants and batteries, including home battery systems. AEMO also sees a significant role for coordinated consumer energy resources (CER) including home batteries. Home battery systems surpassed 250,000 by the end of 2023, accounting for more than 2700 MW hours of capacity. While this number may seem high, around 3.7 million Australian homes have rooftop solar units installed, meaning less than one in 14 households with solar units have home battery systems installed. To achieve the current ISP capacity of coordinated CER, storage will need to rise from today’s 0.2 GW to 3.7 GW in 2029-30 and increase tenfold to 37 GW in 2049-50. If achieved, it is projected it would account for up to 66 per cent of the NEM’s energy storage nameplate capacity.

I don't think you'd get much solar on a drizzly day. If you think you never get two days like that in a row, come and visit Victoria one winter.
 
I hate seeing TV commercials for Natural Gas and how great it is for Australians blah blah.

For starters, the LPG market has meant that they've almost priced themselves out of the market.
Home use is horrendous ( right now Gas for heating in Victoria has less emissions than Coal based Electricity , but the price is horrendous ).
It should be good for riding the peaks and troughs of the renewable electricity market, but the market is avoiding in favor of using coal.
It is telling how they're selling it. They clearly see the end coming and are trying to hang on for as long as possible
 
Day 7 of the multiple page pro-Dutton sponsorship series by Santos and the gas industry in the Murdoch rags..

bafkreihu3yfkrefa3kxfrbbr7iygmbzp4nh73ml6rfjfjvehfljnnnzzdq.jpg bafkreigtcpvsn3yuvl74rkp7g26o4n4yopg57hnnozefvk4ztm3crq2uhi.jpg

'Time to be the adults in the room'. irony much?

The reality is that NewsCorp gas crisis hysteria series, paid for by the Gas industry, strangely fails to mention that these foreign owned corporates are exporting 80% of Australia's gas, choking domestic supply and price gouging Australian customers.

Screenshot 2024-12-08 at 10.51.04 AM.png
 
Last edited:
Day 7 of the multiple page pro-Dutton sponsorship series by Santos and the gas industry in the Murdoch rags..

View attachment 2183789View attachment 2183790

'Time to be the adults in the room'. irony much?

The reality is that NewsCorp gas crisis hysteria series, paid for by the Gas industry, strangely fails to mention that these foreign owned corporates are exporting 80% of Australia's gas, choking domestic supply and price gouging Australian customers.

View attachment 2183805

Absolutely. Keep the gas, export more coal
 
Source please ….

And you do realise solar still works when it’s cloudy.

Here’s what AEMO says….

Integrated System Plan (ISP) forecasts Australia will need at least 49GW of storage by 2050 in order to reach net zero. As mentioned, this storage capacity will include a mix of pumped hydro, virtual power plants and batteries, including home battery systems. AEMO also sees a significant role for coordinated consumer energy resources (CER) including home batteries. Home battery systems surpassed 250,000 by the end of 2023, accounting for more than 2700 MW hours of capacity. While this number may seem high, around 3.7 million Australian homes have rooftop solar units installed, meaning less than one in 14 households with solar units have home battery systems installed. To achieve the current ISP capacity of coordinated CER, storage will need to rise from today’s 0.2 GW to 3.7 GW in 2029-30 and increase tenfold to 37 GW in 2049-50. If achieved, it is projected it would account for up to 66 per cent of the NEM’s energy storage nameplate capacity.

Net zero is very different to a reliable grid that will prevent rolling blackouts.

You have to remember., fossil fuel provides about 14GW of power every hour. So 49GW of battery would last less than 4 hours if they were being relied upon. Then then have to be recharged.
 
Last edited:
Net zero us very different to a reliable grid that will prevent rolling blackouts.

You have to remember., fossil fuel provides about 14GW of power every hour. So 49GW of battery would last less than 4 hours if they were being relied upon. Then then have to be recharged.

For those that a mentally challenged and can’t understand that there will be a mix …. It’s hard concept.
 
I find it funny you didn’t reply to my maths.
The silence is deafening.
Are you still saying it’s 4O cents a KWH For battery storage.

Yes I’m still saying $0.24 to $0.40 kwh

I note you didn’t actually answer the question put forward to you and thus didn’t bother debating on half facts
 
Source please ….

And you do realise solar still works when it’s cloudy.

Here’s what AEMO says….

Integrated System Plan (ISP) forecasts Australia will need at least 49GW of storage by 2050 in order to reach net zero. As mentioned, this storage capacity will include a mix of pumped hydro, virtual power plants and batteries, including home battery systems. AEMO also sees a significant role for coordinated consumer energy resources (CER) including home batteries. Home battery systems surpassed 250,000 by the end of 2023, accounting for more than 2700 MW hours of capacity. While this number may seem high, around 3.7 million Australian homes have rooftop solar units installed, meaning less than one in 14 households with solar units have home battery systems installed. To achieve the current ISP capacity of coordinated CER, storage will need to rise from today’s 0.2 GW to 3.7 GW in 2029-30 and increase tenfold to 37 GW in 2049-50. If achieved, it is projected it would account for up to 66 per cent of the NEM’s energy storage nameplate capacity.

So 60 to 120 minutes based on current demand and future demand in 2050

That sounds like grid stability rather than storage for meeting demand
 

Remove this Banner Ad

The war against renewable energy

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top