The war against renewable energy

Remove this Banner Ad

If the factory where i work was to want storage for 12 hours , it would cost us $600 000 Dollars if we wanted to work all night.
They can buy the same amount of power from the grid for $120
It would take us 14 years to pay for it at which point it would be operating at a much reduced capacity.
This would not be considered an economic decision by most commercial companies, NOT CHEAP. Just NOT CHEAP.

So the factory is using 1200KWH a night … @10cents. That’s a great price. If I could get that price I wouldn’t have got a battery.
I’m assuming 1200kw battery… the mistake is having a battery only covering usage. If the factory added solar to replenish the battery and supply power during the day and also added 50% to the battery size.. they could export excess solar and battery capacity to the grid.
 
So the factory is using 1200KWH a night … @10cents. That’s a great price. If I could get that price I wouldn’t have got a battery.
I’m assuming 1200kw battery… the mistake is having a battery only covering usage. If the factory added solar to replenish the battery and supply power during the day and also added 50% to the battery size.. they could export excess solar and battery capacity to the grid.

You'd need a 16,800KW battery to supply 1,200KW over 14 hours at night and before you can start charging from the solar.

Then you'd need 3,500KW of solar to recharge that battery in 8 hours and provide power to run the plant - 2,100KW for the battery and 1,200 for the plant. That assume 100% efficiency. Double that to account for variable weather, so you need 7,000KW of solar panels - that's 10,000 industrial panels.

But, if you add 50% to the battery - wow...we're talking about a 24,000KW battery.
 
You'd need a 16,800KW battery to supply 1,200KW over 14 hours at night and before you can start charging from the solar.

Then you'd need 3,500KW of solar to recharge that battery in 8 hours and provide power to run the plant - 2,100KW for the battery and 1,200 for the plant. That assume 100% efficiency. Double that to account for variable weather, so you need 7,000KW of solar panels - that's 10,000 industrial panels.

But, if you add 50% to the battery - wow...we're talking about a 24,000KW battery.
I think you misunderstood..

His factory only uses 1200kwh a night. So it only needs a 1200kwh battery.

$600,000 for the battery he said @$500 a KWH = 1200 … over 12 hours is 100kw an hour.

Battery packs are dropping in price .., $480,000 would be break even if they continued to pay 10c a KWH. That’s $400 per KWH of battery storage…

If I was designing a solar and battery system for his factory I’d roughy have 400kw
of solar and a 2000kwh battery.
 
Last edited:

Log in to remove this ad.

I think you misunderstood..

His factory only uses 1200kwh a night. So it only needs a 1200kwh battery.

$600,000 for the battery he said @$500 a KWH = 1200 … over 12 hours is 100kw an hour.

Battery packs are dropping in price .., $480,000 would be break even if they continued to pay 10c a KWH. That’s $400 per KWH of battery storage…

If I was designing a solar and battery system for his factory I’d roughy have 400kw
of solar and a 2000kwh battery.

In real life we only operate an extended day shift. A 100kw solar array in Victoria should halve our electricity purchasing.
( Which is what i'm pushing for ).

A 200kw array would need storage to be useful.
Unfortunately we're too small to access those best available $500/kw hour systems. ( The kind of prices "big battery" builders get ).

Enough solar to be helpful is cheap.

Trying to increase from that 50% to 100% gets progressively more expensive as you need more and more panels and battery. ( We run out of roof space at 250ish Kw ).
 
Agreed, the other problem we have is the emission intensive methods to extract all the materials to get it all to scale.

Can anyone in here point out how far the projection of sodium batteries? Wouldn't these better coz without the chems associated with lithium batteries?

I'm a bit of a novice here, actually far from that even, interested in the conversation though.

Not convinced we have the tech or materials to build renewables to scale - yet.

Gonna fairly speculate............

-Concrete for windfarms - emission intensive
-Infrastructure - intrusive on the environment.
-Mining for materials - emission intensive.

But we gotta start somewhere.

It seems the sodium is pretty close for fixed place ( Grid and Home ) storage.
Due to lower energy density its not ready for car use yet.
Most people wouldn't really care if the battery in their garage was a bit bigger and heavier.
 
I think you misunderstood..

His factory only uses 1200kwh a night. So it only needs a 1200kwh battery.

$600,000 for the battery he said @$500 a KWH = 1200 … over 12 hours is 100kw an hour.

Battery packs are dropping in price .., $480,000 would be break even if they continued to pay 10c a KWH. That’s $400 per KWH of battery storage…

If I was designing a solar and battery system for his factory I’d roughy have 400kw
of solar and a 2000kwh battery.

You're right, I did misread the usage.
 
In real life we only operate an extended day shift. A 100kw solar array in Victoria should halve our electricity purchasing.
( Which is what i'm pushing for ).

A 200kw array would need storage to be useful.
Unfortunately we're too small to access those best available $500/kw hour systems. ( The kind of prices "big battery" builders get ).

Enough solar to be helpful is cheap.

Trying to increase from that 50% to 100% gets progressively more expensive as you need more and more panels and battery. ( We run out of roof space at 250ish Kw ).

Why are you even considering this when you're paying 10c KWh?

The capital cost of solar is better invested elsewhere - even giving staff a small pay rise to deal with cost of living.
 
Why are you even considering this when you're paying 10c KWh?

The capital cost of solar is better invested elsewhere - even giving staff a small pay rise to deal with cost of living.
The break even price is 15c a kWh for a $600,000 1200kwh batter … So it’s getting close.
Just need battery packs to drop more.
 
Why are you even considering this when you're paying 10c KWh?

The capital cost of solar is better invested elsewhere - even giving staff a small pay rise to deal with cost of living.

Corporate demand to reduce CO2.
Water use is there too and that's incredibly hard to do economically.

Also i forgot that there are some network charges that will reduce with less electricity purchased from the grid.
 
A 60kw home battery on wheels for $27k ….


With an NMC battery, it might only has 1,000 or at best 2,000 cycles. Plus the higher risk of thermal runaway, it's probably not great idea for a home battery
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

With an NMC battery, it might only has 1,000 or at best 2,000 cycles. Plus the higher risk of thermal runaway, it's probably not great idea for a home battery

I’m not great fan of NMC batteries either but how many Tesla powerwall 2s have had thermal runaways or fires? If it is such a high risk?
 
EV sales down according to Murdoch media …

But what’s actually happening


Reporting always lags a lot in Australia, and MG4 may have made a difference, but here's Australia mid year.
Big utes, 2 and a half tonnes of them with 6 cylinder engines, largely used for commuting and grocery shopping.

 
Reporting always lags a lot in Australia, and MG4 may have made a difference, but here's Australia mid year.
Big utes, 2 and a half tonnes of them with 6 cylinder engines, largely used for commuting and grocery shopping.


I’m not a fan of hybrids but with a 30kw battery the BYD shark will offer the majority of tradies etc… an alternative to pure ICE with 100km range on battery and it is about to hit those numbers hard.


Solid state batteries have half the weight of current EV batteries… hybrids will be dead with in 4-5 years imo.
 
Another great story on how battery storage is helping the grid…


Yes batteries can do $0.05kWh, that’s why a $22,800kWh is needed

Otherwise than that, I agree with the sentiment but add this technology needs to improve or find itself obsolete due to cost and the PFAS
 
I’m not a fan of hybrids but with a 30kw battery the BYD shark will offer the majority of tradies etc… an alternative to pure ICE with 100km range on battery and it is about to hit those numbers hard.


Solid state batteries have half the weight of current EV batteries… hybrids will be dead with in 4-5 years imo.

Yep.

BYD seem to make some nice vehicles.
Plug in hybrids give a lot of versatility.
Other hybrids , like the Toyota's are really just an IC engine with a more efficient drive train.
 
again you don't understand what you are representing

a fuel or electrical fire on a combustion engine is not the same as a METAL FIRE from a battery. In risk management systems one looks at likelihood (as you have done) but also measure the risk if it occurs.

A metal fire is a complete other level in terms of outcome and even the ability to manage.




and zero cars catching fire whilst recharging. Wow, MinRes and their insurers must be confused.
Just scaremongering

“The Australian Building Codes Board, the EV Council and EV fire-safety experts broadly agree that EVs are no more likely to catch fire than petrol or diesel cars.”

 

Remove this Banner Ad

The war against renewable energy

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top