- Sep 21, 2004
- 39,517
- 29,612
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- Norwood & Liverpool.
Better for that takeaway place too I believe.I've banned menulog (and other delivery apps). I go pick it up in person and costs way cheaper.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
AFLW 2024 - Round 8 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Better for that takeaway place too I believe.I've banned menulog (and other delivery apps). I go pick it up in person and costs way cheaper.
then you get Chappelle Corby on dancing with the stars I hope ch7s ratings crash for that one
I've banned menulog (and other delivery apps). I go pick it up in person and costs way cheaper.
Dunno I only see stuff on ads.Wasn't she on SAS as well? And quit early on once she'd had her 15 minutes?
I've banned menulog (and other delivery apps). I go pick it up in person and costs way cheaper.
It's also better for the restaurant.
My friend looks at me weird when I say I have never used Ubereats (or Menulog, Deliveroo etc) in my life.
Like walking into a cafe to get a take away coffee I had to wear a mask but directly behind me were people sitting without one. The ****It like 99% of covid rules, they dont make sense, its just the optics of trying to lessen exposure etc
Assaulted by Snoop Dog? I guess no one wants to cop a bong to the headsnoop dogg and people like him sh*t me to death.
the guy has been involved in drug trafficking, drug possession, traffic violations, multiple firearm violations, taking weapons on airlines, assault, vandalism, bankruptcy and was the driver in a shooting where a man was killed. the guy still regularly gets caught in possession of drugs and for taking drugs.
then goes on tv and movies and flaunts his addiction and refuses to change.
menulog must have been smoking something when they thought a convicted drug addict was the best person to be in their ads.
Better for that takeaway place too I believe.
Yeah when push comes to shove I dont really care TBH.Yeah apparently.....but then again they have to sign up to become a restaurant on Uber eats etc? so does it really matter?
i cant get uber eats or menulog or any of those to my place. even dominos charges delivery fee apparently according to my nearest neighbour.
doesnt bother me - i prefer to go get it and eat it there as its hot and fresher than delivered i would have thought
Yeah apparently.....but then again they have to sign up to become a restaurant on Uber eats etc? so does it really matter?
It does, because the margins are a lot thinner using Ubereats et al. Better a small margin than no margin, sure (ie the Ubereats et al customer doesn't even know you exist), but if it's just as easy and cheaper for you to go there yourself - then why not?
While I certainly agree that copywrite law needs to be overhauled, it seems like this Google vs Oracle case was decided correctly if the way its reported by tech news is anything to go by.Copyright == biggest corporation $$$ wins
Google stole / plagiarised 11,330 lines of code from Java to put into the Android OS. Oracle sued.
Putting a snippet of someone else's video into yours is "fair use"
Quoting a passage in a book is "fair use"
Including a recording of part of someone's speech in your podcast is "fair use"
Having the same eight notes in a song is theft and punishable with mega fines and damages
Copying a VHS tape is the same as stealing a car
Copying over 11000 lines of code is not, apparently, according to the US Supreme Court. Oracle lost because it was deemed "fair use" by Google.
As US District Court of Northern California judge William Alsup, one of the few judges who's also a programmer, who ruled in Google's favor years ago, wrote: An API is merely "a long hierarchy of over six thousand commands to carry out pre-assigned functions. For that reason, it cannot receive copyright protection -- patent protection perhaps -- but not copyright protection." Oracle lost its Java patent lawsuit long ago.
The fact that one of the judges along the way that happened to also be a programmer (and therefore would have had a better understanding of the case than most) ruled in favour of Google says a fair bit too imo