CakeEater
Brownlow Medallist
So you wouldnt take him at Geelong?
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 10 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Traded Tim Kelly [traded with #57 and future 3rd to West Coast for #14, #24, #33 and future 1st]
- Thread starter Lore
- Start date
- Tagged users None
So you wouldnt take him at Geelong?
Not for kelly. Pick 14 and nicnat the club would take though.
- May 5, 2006
- 62,814
- 70,182
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Why is anyone talking about NicNat?
His trade value in 2012: don't even bother asking
His trade value in 2015: very high, probably impractically high to bother making an offer
His trade value now: Negligible. 29 years old and has played 20 games in 3 years.
His trade value in 2012: don't even bother asking
His trade value in 2015: very high, probably impractically high to bother making an offer
His trade value now: Negligible. 29 years old and has played 20 games in 3 years.
Sixpence
Brownlow Medallist
- Feb 9, 2015
- 4,777
- 9,426
- AFL Club
- Geelong
Nic Nat's coming?
Great news. We're lacking a strong wingman opposite Blicavs.
Great news. We're lacking a strong wingman opposite Blicavs.
evo
Let's hit the f*ken road!
to be fair Kelly is genuine elite - current top 10 rnking in the AFL. Carved Richmond up just a few weeks ago.
Wingard at his best was pretty bloody good, but would struggle to be in the top 100 at the moment by my reckoning. Couldn't carve up a Xmas turkey.
- May 5, 2006
- 62,814
- 70,182
- AFL Club
- West Coast
If Kelly is as good as you say why didn't your team put any work into him? I watched the prelim and wondered why he was left completely alone. Season high uncontested possession count and close to season low clearance and tackle numbers. Not a chance Dangerfield gets to float forward and be left alone like that.
Anyway my point was that if Port wanted to they could've demanded XYZ for Wingard. Instead they weighed up what Hawthorn had to work with vs his salary, looming free agency etc. and decided to trade rather than letting Kochy do the negotiations and making arbitrary demands.
- Aug 31, 2008
- 25,423
- 54,303
- AFL Club
- Hawthorn
- Other Teams
- Nuggets
Burton was going home to Adelaide at the end of his contract. Better to cash in when we did then risk it all.
Damo just answered that on trade radio.....made absolutely no sense, stumbled through his explanation and I’m still confused what about what crap he was trying to say
evo
Let's hit the f*ken road!
- May 5, 2006
- 62,814
- 70,182
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Damo is a fool.
Danger was a free agent, but Geelong couldn't or didn't want to buy him that way. As meek as Adelaide are they aren't going to let their best player walk for $800k a year and pick 14 when the team he was going to had pick 9. Adelaide would have been happy to pay Danger $1m a year and still have him today.
Kelly isn't a free agent so there is means for any club to just sign him and no compo on offer to Geelong. No one wants to buy him either, but it is still possible. WC would rather pay him whatever terms they have agreed to and trade than try and put a price on his head in the draft. I imagine other clubs in the same position would be likewise.
Burton being one of the brightest young players in the game at the time. But James Hird was drafted in the 70’s so I suppose if he was to be traded at any stage he’d be still worth the same... stop trolling...
- May 5, 2006
- 62,814
- 70,182
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Brightest young players in the game, OK. Must have missed him in the 22under22 side the last two years. That 18th placed finish in the 2018 B&F playing 23 games, oh boy.
FMD even the Hawthorn fans who were adamant he was robbed of the Rising Star with McGrath won it were off the Burton bandwagon last year.
Kelly has recieved the number one tag numerous times this season.
Plus richmond were more interested in beating up on a second year player in Miers. How houli was allowed to play in the grand final after hawkins got done for the same thing a week earlier that houli did to miers is disgustingly corrupt. Guess geelong doesnt have the same media influence as richmond and west coast.
- May 5, 2006
- 62,814
- 70,182
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Yes I watched the GWS game when he got 9 touches too.
“At the time”. But you go ahead and keep manipulating words to suit your narrative.
He was injured that day. Shouldnt of played given he injured himself and missed the whole last qtr the week before against port. Kicked an awesome goal early in the first against gws and then pulled up lame 2 mins later.
- May 20, 2017
- 5,928
- 9,712
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Difference is Geelong are the one losing a player this time.
- May 5, 2006
- 62,814
- 70,182
- AFL Club
- West Coast
He was traded last year. Last year is "at the time" he was traded. Is the water OK to drink where you live?
Hope you're trolling with your footnote about Bigfooty going black and not that you've simply set it to dark mode and haven't realised...
He’s had a poor year this year. At the time he was one of the best young players in the game having recently finished second in the rising star. Certainly had more runs on the board than the young WC players that have been mentioned as possible trade options.
The Falcon Strike
Hall of Famer
The original post said top 10 - not top 4.
Nope pretty sure he will be 30 early next season. Also been highly injury prone recently. Not a troll.
- May 5, 2006
- 62,814
- 70,182
- AFL Club
- West Coast
He was traded at the end of 2018, after playing 23 of 24 games for Hawthorn and finishing 18th in the B&F.
