Having now listened to the interview, I'd say there is absolutely nothing in Harper's dismissal of Rowe's question about some mythical contractual difficulty. He treated the question with the contempt it deserved. Nothing to see there.
However, I will agree that the implication of his "we won't get another Kurt Tippett for Kurt Tippett" comment was that we won't get true value in a player trade. Mind you, that doesn't preclude us from trading for multiple items (player + pick?) that together sum to Tippett's value.
All in all he mostly just sounded grumpy. I've spoken to Phil before and he's not normally as grumpy and as short as he was in that interview. Sounds like he's had a gutful of things and just wants to get the trade period over and done with and move on to 2013.
On an unrelated point, really pleased to hear Harper give Nick Poulos a big plug. I reckon he's far more important than he has been given credit for.
However, I will agree that the implication of his "we won't get another Kurt Tippett for Kurt Tippett" comment was that we won't get true value in a player trade. Mind you, that doesn't preclude us from trading for multiple items (player + pick?) that together sum to Tippett's value.
All in all he mostly just sounded grumpy. I've spoken to Phil before and he's not normally as grumpy and as short as he was in that interview. Sounds like he's had a gutful of things and just wants to get the trade period over and done with and move on to 2013.
On an unrelated point, really pleased to hear Harper give Nick Poulos a big plug. I reckon he's far more important than he has been given credit for.