- Jul 16, 2013
- 15,287
- 20,171
- AFL Club
- Essendon
It's not hard to find if you open your eyes, could be a massive mistake that costs the club for years
So no report on this extra future 2nd?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not hard to find if you open your eyes, could be a massive mistake that costs the club for years
Give it timeSo no report on this extra future 2nd?
If he was never for sale, why didn't the Blues move on earlier? After Shiel Coniglio, Carlton really needed to land an A-grader this year to match up the ladder but they really added nothing in the off season, which must be incredibly disappointing for abljes fans.Can lose what you don't have. The reality is he was never for sale because EFC weren't going to deal
Give it time
The annoying thing is that Sydney led us on knowing they needed 9 for daniher with the intention they would still likely deal papley without him, had we known from day 1 i'd suspect we would have got a Wines type in the door instead and not turned our back on Butler.Can lose what you don't have. The reality is he was never for sale because EFC weren't going to deal
Of the 30 or so other players up for sale who else did we want? No point trade just for the sake of it.If he was never for sale, why didn't the Blues move on earlier? After Shiel Coniglio, Carlton really needed to land an A-grader this year to match up the ladder but they really added nothing in the off season, which must be incredibly disappointing for abljes fans.
Not really, we aren't winning the flag in 2020 and papley unless he breaks up with his partner will still want to come home next year.If he was never for sale, why didn't the Blues move on earlier? After Shiel Coniglio, Carlton really needed to land an A-grader this year to match up the ladder but they really added nothing in the off season, which must be incredibly disappointing for abljes fans.
If you want a tom browne tweet so you believe it I can't give that to you no, few days from now though im sure someone will give you the article you desire.So no.
If he was never for sale, why didn't the Blues move on earlier? After Shiel Coniglio, Carlton really needed to land an A-grader this year to match up the ladder but they really added nothing in the off season, which must be incredibly disappointing for abljes fans.
If you want a tom browne tweet so you believe it I can't give that to you no, few days from now though im sure someone will give you the article you desire.
Why make shit up?If you want a tom browne tweet so you believe it I can't give that to you no, few days from now though im sure someone will give you the article you desire.
If it helps you sleep at night. Could have had 4 + 9 + 23, remember that in 12 months time.So no is still your answer. Thanks for clearing that up for me.
I don't know, call Lloyd and ask him why he lied about what was offered for daniher. (He said 5 + 25 and neither of them were part of the offer lol)Why make shit up?
If it helps you sleep at night. Could have had 4 + 9 + 23, remember that in 12 months time.
“We put forward what we thought was a compelling deal and that was involving two first-round picks.”Ok.
Still glad to confirm that you were lying though.
Once Martin fell through I am sure we would have made this offer, Swans didn't want to let him go still.I'm still not entirely sure we held Papley because we couldn't get the Daniher deal done. I think it's because the Blues were asking for us to send too much back.
If it was a straight swap for pick 9, I'm sure the club would have done it. If not, I'd imagine most Swans supporters would be filthy with them for not doing it.
Sounds like it was never offered. Don't see how you could go from pick 9 for Papley and pick 25 to a straight swap - that's a pretty huge jump. Seems SOS and whoever else just didn't rate him highly enough tbh.Once Martin fell through I am sure we would have made this offer, Swans didn't want to let him go still.
Who do I believe you or both teams list managers who said no Daniher no Papley?Sounds like it was never offered. Don't see how you could go from pick 9 for Papley and pick 25 to a straight swap - that's a pretty huge jump. Seems SOS and whoever else just didn't rate him highly enough tbh.
Meh believe what you want. You also believed it was a foregone conclusion that Papley was gone before trade period and weren't buying it when I tried to convince you otherwise.Who do I believe you or both teams list managers who said no Daniher no Papley?
Think we sorted that one out.
“We put forward what we thought was a compelling deal and that was involving two first-round picks.”
Hear what you want, the only one lying here is you to yourself.
We knew months ago Papley wasn't coming without Daniher, just didn't expect Essendon to be so stupid.Meh believe what you want. You also believed it was a foregone conclusion that Papley was gone before trade period and weren't buying it when I tried to convince you otherwise.
Maybe if your club hadn't tried to rip us off for most of the trade period we would have made some progress.
Harley implied with the use of the word involving that their was something extra on top and its been mentioned.I never doubted the two 1sts.
I asked about the extra 2nd you just threw in.