Gone Critical
Moderator
- Moderator
- #9,251
I dont buy that line. We could have still bought in 6 players without giving up on the 1st. Just means Poulter, McMahon and McCreery would be substituted for 3 others. The way it was panning out that would have taken Poulter out for sure but the other two may have slipped. Alternatively we would have two other kids, slightly later picks but we would still have the ability to trade pick 2 for a much better outcome.We took 6 players inside 44 last year
5 inside 31.
Everything we did that you see now was a byproduct of last years draft
If we didn’t have a father son prospect...we wouldn’t have planned it this way but we made as good as we could to bring in 6 young players in one sitting in the ND last year.