I don’t have much sympathy for the clubs on the list management front. They’ll run supplement programs, silly pre-season camps, altitude trainings, partner with university sports science departments, etc. to get a small edge but won’t use the ****ing Pre Season Draft?I get where people are coming from that it’s different when players earn 15mil instead of 500k per year.
But I just think that it’ll make players stay contracted and give clubs a bit more room in negotiation, I doubt we’d see that many players actually cop it they’d just adapt. The current system just doesn’t work for clubs.
Plus the players are contracted by the AFL so I’m not sure how a restraint of trade lawsuit would hold up
It’s a crock of **** that North got priority picks while not even trying to use the PSD across multiple years. If the bottom clubs start using it then it becomes a proper threat in trade discussions for uncontracted players, either helping the player if they’re happy to be a mercenary (as is their right) or helping the club if the player really doesn’t want to end up at a rubbish team (and so maybe they agree to an alternate “acceptable” team offering a better trade).
North should have been offering Dunkley a 1-year $1m deal with a promise to trade him to his club of choice in 12-months for a single pick under #[18] - or [x] draft index points across no more than 2 picks. Also they should have been offering Logue a big one-off signing bonus if he agreed to come via the PSD. That’s a far better use of their excess salary for being garbage than picking up Hugh Greenwood.