Strategy Trade and List management Thread Part 6 (opposition supporters - READ posting rules before posting)

Remove this Banner Ad

Status
Not open for further replies.

Log in to remove this ad.

Looking forward to Coffield getting a full pre season. Harmes to play Half forward or wing. Croft has versatility and could play back or Ruck if he doesn't play forward.

Thanks !!

tipping derek jeter GIF
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Geelong "won" the Ratugolea trade.
They got power to add 76 & 94 on top of their offer of 25. Lucky they held out an extra week.

That has to be worth an extra 6 draft index points !! Well worth hanging out for !!!

The Office Lol GIF by NETFLIX
 
Looking forward to Coffield getting a full pre season. Harmes to play Half forward or wing. Croft has versatility and could play back or Ruck if he doesn't play forward.
Harmes will absolutely be an onballer. He attended centre bounces every game he played this year, and we struggled to mix and match combinations of Macrae, Daniel and Smith last year, which you can interpret that we didn't want to play any of those three at centre bounces but were forced to simply because we didn't have anyone else. Onballer being the 3 mids who attend the centre bounce rotation - I anticipate those 3 other players will still be "better" around the midfield and given more responsibility and in between the arcs in general play - but it's clear that we were uncertain who was going to be our centre bounce rotation players after Libba, Treloar and Bont. Hell, in R23 win we gave 8 centre bounces to a bloke we just delisted, and 11 to a bloke who is better as a small forward and didn't attend a single centre bounce before that round. It's tough/defensive cover that we sorely missed without Dunkley last year, and while I hope that the 4th midfield spot will be filled by a back-to-form Macrae or Smith, we still need to rotate a 5th player in there for 5-10 centre bounces a game even if everyone is fit.
 
These accumulation of points are effectively worth a pick in the late teens.

So effectively:

Pick 11 and future first for Pick 5, Harmes and Coffield
"Break Up" Pick 18 for equivalent points value with later picks.

I think that's somewhat acceptable, even if most teams often do better jobs at breaking up picks value.

But that's only half the battle - getting a pick ahead of any potential Croft bid is the game.

You get the 20% discount.

So we're going to get a top 5 player and a top-end talent, just by manipulating the points around draft picks.

We did something similar with JUH, and while it can leave your list depth exposed (see Darcy and JUH eating up the picks), it still is moneyball-economics the best way of building a list.

It's such a rort, and the AFL needs to fix it. We've been a somewhat successful team over the last 5 years, but at the same time, been able to bring in 4-5 top-end talent players at the same time, simply because the AFL hasn't updated a mathematics formula they came up with over 10 years ago.

Maybe our execution of maximising points wasn't 100% as clean as some other teams have done it, but I'd rather the fact that we execute it early and at least 90% as effective, leaving us open to dedicate our time to other rorts (see Treloar).
 
Wondering if we are going to try and roll any of these into future picks, we don’t have enough list spots to take them all to the draft
Won't some of them be absorbed in the bid for Croft (2 or 4, idfk), so that we will really have a fair few less picks than it currently looks?
 
Harmes will absolutely be an onballer. He attended centre bounces every game he played this year, and we struggled to mix and match combinations of Macrae, Daniel and Smith last year, which you can interpret that we didn't want to play any of those three at centre bounces but were forced to simply because we didn't have anyone else. Onballer being the 3 mids who attend the centre bounce rotation - I anticipate those 3 other players will still be "better" around the midfield and given more responsibility and in between the arcs in general play - but it's clear that we were uncertain who was going to be our centre bounce rotation players after Libba, Treloar and Bont. Hell, in R23 win we gave 8 centre bounces to a bloke we just delisted, and 11 to a bloke who is better as a small forward and didn't attend a single centre bounce before that round. It's tough/defensive cover that we sorely missed without Dunkley last year, and while I hope that the 4th midfield spot will be filled by a back-to-form Macrae or Smith, we still need to rotate a 5th player in there for 5-10 centre bounces a game even if everyone is fit.
Just repeating what was said on trade radio.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Remove this Banner Ad

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top