Strategy Trade and List Management Thread Part 7 (opposition supporters - READ posting rules before posting)

Remove this Banner Ad

Anybody still believe that PSD or ND actually holds any leverage during trade negotiations?
We got more than 17 for Smith. We had a shit hand and used the threat of the draft as part of the leverage we tried to create. The draft threat was unlikely to be implemented, but the alternative was to say nothing and accept 17 from Geelong.
 

Log in to remove this ad.

Not really a melt, just a simple observation.

We should be aiming for top 4/flag. Collingwood & Hawks have both been aggressive to get back to that point, we were absolutely nowhere near being in that conversation along with them.

Just not really a fan to be going into next year which is mostly hopeful for internal development to push us to the next level, also being reliant on luck with injuries - especially in defence.
Mate, Collingwood were average this year. They recruited a gun HB Flanker, which is not a position of need for them. Look at their forward line. They have solid small representation, but no key forwards apart from Mihocek. They have no draft capital this year or next year and need to make a play for someone like Darcy or JUH.
 
17, 25, 35, 48 is a solid draft hand for this draft while having all of our future picks also and a ton of cap space. Not the worst position to be in.
3 senior players down, Kennedy in.

I know people think that's ok, but geez.

The only trade we did well out of was Caleb. And we absolutely should not have let both he and Macrae go.
 
Anybody still believe that PSD or ND actually holds any leverage during trade negotiations?
It was through that leverage that we upgraded 45 to 38.

Basically nothing but still something.
 
im really happy we off loaded CD and Macrae (saves salary cap for next year)
Smith is a coke head fck him (hope he becomes a menzel)
Kennnedy a great pickup
well done Sam Power
 
Not really a melt, just a simple observation.

We should be aiming for top 4/flag. Collingwood & Hawks have both been aggressive to get back to that point, we were absolutely nowhere near being in that conversation along with them.

Just not really a fan to be going into next year which is mostly hopeful for internal development to push us to the next level, also being reliant on luck with injuries - especially in defence.
It's 100% a melt because your comparing us to teams like Collingwood and Hawthorn who have always been able to recruit big names. I'm not sure if you've followed bulldogs that long but the likes of Houston, Barass, Perryman would be some of the biggest recruits in the clubs history.
 

(Log in to remove this ad.)

Now that's over, let's clear up the most important issue...

With the deal being more-or-less Kennedy for Macrae, and with Kennedy being 27 with a three year contract, it seems the years we get from Kennedy will be the final package of the gift that was Jordan McMahon.

Unless we can get him to 100 games for the future F/S as well...
 
Haha saying "we may as well fold the club" is absolutely a melt, come on...

Yeah that was a bit extreme, but the point remains. If we don’t have something big planned for next year, wtf are we even doing?

I think we’ve wasted enough of the prime years of the best player our club has ever had and haven’t been pro-active enough, this years trade period is just another of them.

I know we have some young guns coming through, but they also need help
 
Mate, Collingwood were average this year. They recruited a gun HB Flanker, which is not a position of need for them. Look at their forward line. They have solid small representation, but no key forwards apart from Mihocek. They have no draft capital this year or next year and need to make a play for someone like Darcy or JUH.
McStay?
 
We got more than 17 for Smith. We had a shit hand and used the threat of the draft as part of the leverage we tried to create. The draft threat was unlikely to be implemented, but the alternative was to say nothing and accept 17 from Geelong.
It was through that leverage that we upgraded 45 to 38.

Basically nothing but still something.

Keep telling yourselves that.

We essentially got the deal that we were always going to get.

Geelong's first and a shuffling of later picks.

Geelongs posturing about pick 17 alone was just that. Posturing.
 
It was through that leverage that we upgraded 45 to 38.

Basically nothing but still something.
I would actually say it was through the very small chance that he doesn't get to Geelong through the ND that we got that minor upgrade. It was through the very large and real threat of him getting Geelong anyway through the ND that we more generally got ****ed in the trade. The PSD / ND draft threat is very real, it just very sensibly gets priced into the deals.
 

Remove this Banner Ad

Strategy Trade and List Management Thread Part 7 (opposition supporters - READ posting rules before posting)

Remove this Banner Ad

Back
Top