- Apr 22, 2010
- 6,213
- 5,435
- AFL Club
- Essendon
- Other Teams
- Canucks, Cowboys, Renegades
-
LIVE: Sydney v Brisbane Lions - 2:30PM AEST Sat
Squiggle tips Lions at 61% chance -- What's your tip? -- Ticketing Buy, Sell -- Teams on Thurs »
-
AFLW 2024 - Round 4 - Chat, game threads, injury lists, team lineups and more.
Trade/Delistings/List Management 2010 Thread
- Thread starter Burzum
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Status
MarkMiller93
Debutant
Time's up for Neagle+Laycock?
Both have been considered a work in progress for too long now.
With the find of Hurley and now Gumbleton playing injury free, the rotation of Hille/Ryder down forward, i really don't think there's a use for Neagle, nor do i believe he's AFL standard.
Feel sorry for Laycock, has potential but can't get on the track from injuries. Ryder starting to find his straps and Hille becoming dominant. Back-up if required Bellchambers.
Is there room for them anymore?
Both have been considered a work in progress for too long now.
With the find of Hurley and now Gumbleton playing injury free, the rotation of Hille/Ryder down forward, i really don't think there's a use for Neagle, nor do i believe he's AFL standard.
Feel sorry for Laycock, has potential but can't get on the track from injuries. Ryder starting to find his straps and Hille becoming dominant. Back-up if required Bellchambers.
Is there room for them anymore?
Rack Watts
Here's MASON
Re: Time's up for Neagle+Laycock?
Laycock is the perfect age to take over from Hille.
I still believe in him, really good tap ruckman.
Laycock is the perfect age to take over from Hille.
I still believe in him, really good tap ruckman.
Re: Time's up for Neagle+Laycock?
Nope. Time's up.
Both could be good trade bait for GC, although they should be able to get Laycock for free if they want him.
We will need to start developing another Ruckman to replace Hille in 2-3 years though in case Bock and TBell don't make it.
Nope. Time's up.
Both could be good trade bait for GC, although they should be able to get Laycock for free if they want him.
We will need to start developing another Ruckman to replace Hille in 2-3 years though in case Bock and TBell don't make it.
- Banned
- #859
Re: Time's up for Neagle+Laycock?
Don't we have to get rid of a certain amount of players? If so, then these two should be the first out of the door.
Don't we have to get rid of a certain amount of players? If so, then these two should be the first out of the door.
Re: Time's up for Neagle+Laycock?
Both have very, very low trade value so we'd effectively get nothing for them. Neagle is still young enough to come good and doesn't Laycock still have a year to run on his contract (end 2011)?
Could we drop Neagle down on the rookie list or even put him up for trade as a bit of a kick in the bum that he needs?
To some extent, I feel sorry for Neagle because he was very unfairly dropped at the start of the year, showed good form at Bendigo and then got overlooked for Hurley on one leg. IIRC, his form dropped right from that point. Someone needs to get in his ear and quickly.
Both have very, very low trade value so we'd effectively get nothing for them. Neagle is still young enough to come good and doesn't Laycock still have a year to run on his contract (end 2011)?
Could we drop Neagle down on the rookie list or even put him up for trade as a bit of a kick in the bum that he needs?
To some extent, I feel sorry for Neagle because he was very unfairly dropped at the start of the year, showed good form at Bendigo and then got overlooked for Hurley on one leg. IIRC, his form dropped right from that point. Someone needs to get in his ear and quickly.
Re: Time's up for Neagle+Laycock?
Laycock has about 5 months left on his contract, and at Windy Hill. Too brittle for the game.
Laycock has about 5 months left on his contract, and at Windy Hill. Too brittle for the game.
Re: Time's up for Neagle+Laycock?
I think Laycock will stay. We all know how important ruckman are and although we have Bellchambers you really need 4 ruckman. I know we have Bock but he is light years away from putting on 10kilos, let alone getting a senior match.
Id think it would be good to persist with him or at least trade him to Hawthorn who desperately need a ruck. Maybe if we ask nicely they will do a straight sway for Rioli LOL
I think Laycock will stay. We all know how important ruckman are and although we have Bellchambers you really need 4 ruckman. I know we have Bock but he is light years away from putting on 10kilos, let alone getting a senior match.
Id think it would be good to persist with him or at least trade him to Hawthorn who desperately need a ruck. Maybe if we ask nicely they will do a straight sway for Rioli LOL
Re: Time's up for Neagle+Laycock?
Only thing holding Neagle back is Laziness.. Just needs a kick up the bum and something to motivate him..
Has talent, no reason to get rid of him.
Laycock is a good ruckman... Why would we let him go?? As said before, would be a great replacement for when Hille drops off.
Only thing holding Neagle back is Laziness.. Just needs a kick up the bum and something to motivate him..
Has talent, no reason to get rid of him.
Laycock is a good ruckman... Why would we let him go?? As said before, would be a great replacement for when Hille drops off.
Rack Watts
Here's MASON
Re: Time's up for Neagle+Laycock?
Because Laycock does one stupid thing every game we forget how good he is at marking and tap ruckwork, I reckon his cardio should have increased by now.
Because Laycock does one stupid thing every game we forget how good he is at marking and tap ruckwork, I reckon his cardio should have increased by now.
The Fact
Club Legend
Re: Time's up for Neagle+Laycock?
Poor thread neagle still has a year on his contract and laycock was showing good form in the 2.
I still believe inhaving 2 back up ruckmen and no bock can't be included as a man and there is still questions if he is going to make it at all but we should atleast draft another ruckman this year
Poor thread neagle still has a year on his contract and laycock was showing good form in the 2.
I still believe inhaving 2 back up ruckmen and no bock can't be included as a man and there is still questions if he is going to make it at all but we should atleast draft another ruckman this year
Re: Time's up for Neagle+Laycock?
Agreed. Everytime he breaks his foot, he has plenty of spare time to go for a run.
Agreed. Everytime he breaks his foot, he has plenty of spare time to go for a run.
Bombers chasing Dangerfield, Boak, Sidebottom
Just one of many players we are going for very strongly according to Hutch.
Would you take him. Injury prone but has the potential to be an absolute star.
I'd take him.
Thoughts?
Just one of many players we are going for very strongly according to Hutch.
Would you take him. Injury prone but has the potential to be an absolute star.
I'd take him.
Thoughts?
Re: Bombers to go after Dangerfield
Close thread.
ps maybe for pick 91.
Close thread.
ps maybe for pick 91.
Oh Tayteridge
Club Legend
- Oct 8, 2009
- 1,142
- 802
- AFL Club
- Essendon
Re: Bombers to go after Dangerfield
Treww
Treww
TradeDraft
Post-Human
Re: Bombers to go after Dangerfield
Also Said you are trying to also Steal Sidebottom from us too
Also Said you are trying to also Steal Sidebottom from us too
Bombers chasing Dangerfield, Boak, Sidebottom
Just said on the footy show by Hutchy Bombers are trying to sign these guys. Boak isn't news but haven't heard anything on Danger and Sidebottom. Would be awesome if we could get one.
Thoughts?
EDIT: Delete. Didn't see the other thread.
Just said on the footy show by Hutchy Bombers are trying to sign these guys. Boak isn't news but haven't heard anything on Danger and Sidebottom. Would be awesome if we could get one.
Thoughts?
EDIT: Delete. Didn't see the other thread.
TradeDraft
Post-Human
Re: Bombers chasing Dangerfield, Boak, Sidebttom
I would Really Doubt you would get Steele as I can't see him leaving after 2 seasons and I think he is very happy at collingwood
I would Really Doubt you would get Steele as I can't see him leaving after 2 seasons and I think he is very happy at collingwood
Re: Bombers to go after Dangerfield
Boak, Sidebottom and Danger on our radar!
All would come at a cost, our first rd pick + a decent player.
How good would the player need to be?
Boak, Sidebottom and Danger on our radar!
All would come at a cost, our first rd pick + a decent player.
How good would the player need to be?
Re: Bombers to go after Dangerfield
Wait What?
I didnt see TFS, but Im presuming he said we were after him?
All of Adelaide will hate us, now we have Boak AND Dangerfield...
Seriously though, he is a good young kid, we'd be crazy not to want him (depending what it cost us, remember, we dont have quality trade bait like J.Nash anymore)
Wait What?
I didnt see TFS, but Im presuming he said we were after him?
All of Adelaide will hate us, now we have Boak AND Dangerfield...
Seriously though, he is a good young kid, we'd be crazy not to want him (depending what it cost us, remember, we dont have quality trade bait like J.Nash anymore)
TradeDraft
Post-Human
Re: Bombers to go after Dangerfield
I would Really Doubt you would get Steele as I can't see him leaving after 2 seasons and I think he is very happy at collingwood
I would Really Doubt you would get Steele as I can't see him leaving after 2 seasons and I think he is very happy at collingwood
- Status
