Just had a look and he came equal 3rd in the stationary vertical jump, 5th in the repeat sprints, as well as equal 4th in the 20m sprints.
Mega Thread Trade/Draft SuperMegaUltraThread - 2015 trade period edition
- Thread starter Miguel Sanchez
- Start date
- Tagged users None
- Jul 30, 2015
- 3,702
- 4,325
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Was absolutely stoked he slid to pick 48 in the Mock draft if it was real Richmond would be grinning ear to ear !!
iLikeIt
All Australian
- Oct 23, 2015
- 997
- 1,323
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Yes I know - I went back and checked as well afterwards. Although he didn't make the top 10 with 3km, clean hands or the kicking test (if you compare him to Mountford for instance). Not sure why he wasn't front of our minds back then? Has been flying under the radar somewhat until the past few days on BF.
iLikeIt
All Australian
- Oct 23, 2015
- 997
- 1,323
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Seriously? I know he has improved (and killed it in the WAFL after moving to Subi) but still not sure I'd use our 2nd pick and probably not our 3rd either. I'd prefer to try and rookie him given he has tried and been unsuccessful at two other clubs. Do you think anyone else would be looking to draft him?
Ages away
24th November
- Oct 8, 2007
- 13,854
- 9,561
- AFL Club
- West Coast
- Other Teams
- FLO-RIDA , PITBULL ,SEAN PAUL
In a weak draft like this i
Pick 31 would be great .wce don't have the luxury of waiting till pick 61 .I think he can play straight away and have some effect .
ROC1969
Team Captain
- Oct 12, 2015
- 306
- 446
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Well it sounds that apart from these footballing fundamentals he's good to go?
I would like us to go for a key position player in the draft (preferably a defender) and develop them to play at either ends of the ground. We got Barrass as one of the defenders to move into the side but Emacs getting closer to 30 and Brown (chance he might not even be there next season) and schoey injury prone. So it might not be bad idea to puts 2-4 years of development into a player (bit like barrass) and plan him to be a succession player.
would love Glass-McCasker at pick 31 but have a feeling he might not be there.
Maybe we could get a dylan smith or sam skinner later in the draft.
Yeah mayb, but i though shuey in the early day had the pace that could break lines. He was playing more in the forward flanks and used to his pace more often on the outside and burned the opposition.
Yeah I agree, shuey probably is more explosive than anything. he can burst out of the blocks get clear in 20-30meters and burn everyone (like the goal in the prelim v north) but he is caught up by other in the long run. Dangerfield on the other hand is both explosive and can maintain his pace for a long time.
i read that he's not a great inside mid and he's too slow to play outside. He's height and endurance is what apparently has scouts interested. One person suggested that he might be a thrird tall forwad that plays the linkman role like tom Lynch from the crows. We got a few players doing that role so we dont really need more.
As can Jetta
Yeah jetta is an outside player, was just comparing the two inside mids.
So basically Colledge mk 2
Yeah can't say I have any interest in Clark in the ND.
So in other words we will choose him with our first pick.
If Tucker were to slide to our pick we should definitely take him. Kid is quality imo
- Oct 9, 2009
- 12,605
- 14,330
- AFL Club
- West Coast
Well, we may need a replacement in case Essendon poaches him in the rookie draft.
Clarkes predicted to go in the 40's/50's. i wouldnt pick him with our second pick
Similar threads
- Locked
- Poll
- Locked
- Poll
